Will27

Episodes 1 and 2 are dropping now.

You could always apply for a s/c 820 partnership visa in Australia, as long as visa condition 8503 hasn't been imposed. Applying offshore is s/c 309 visa.

You can't always apply in Australia. That's the problem.

That can be a decent option, but in some cases, the tourist visa is issued with an 8503 No Further Stay condition which precludes you from applying in Australia. A lot will depend on the length of the relationship and if she has travelled to Australia before.

What do we think of the proposed wildcard being introduced? I don't like it. IMO, if you're not good enough to finish in the top half of the table, you shouldn't be playing finals. Most of the people pushing it have a vested interest as it means more games and dollars for the broadcasters and the AFL. It's a no from me.

This new one from the Beeb is getting good reviews. Follows the deaths of Peter Farquhar and Ann Moore-Martin in the village of Maids Moreton, Buckinghamshire, and the extraordinary events that unfolded in the following years.

Well Gents That's it for another round. Three picked 7 but this week's Dairy Milk goes to Rip Stanley for being closest to the margin. Until next week.

The UK one is on 1337.

The ATO is not going to provide a link saying they won't chase your debt. That would be stupid. In just about most cases, legal action won't be taken to try and collect a debt when it is uneconomical to do so. Again, spending thousands of dollars to chase a $700 would be ridiculous. This is from a well known accounting firm: ATO determines a debt is not viable to pursue The ATO can determine that a tax debt is not viable to pursue, given the costs associated with pursuing it and the prospects of recovery. If you want to keep debating this issue, start a new thread.

Again, you keep clouding the issue. I never mentioned the debt being released. I said the debt would be written off. You do know the difference between written off and release of a debt don't you?

Again, I was talking about a debt to the ATO, not Centrelink.

You just keep repeating yourself and then go off on these long winded tangents. I quoted your debt of $786, and already said it would be taken from a tax refund if one was available. If it wasn't, the ATO would send out a couple of demand notices. They aren't taking legal action over a debt that small. It would be written off. I'm not interested in your continuing hypotheticals on residents, non-resident, self funded retiree's etc.

In most cases, a Centrelink debt can be recovered by taking money out of their payments. A small debt like the one you mentioned ($786.00) if it was to the ATO would either be written off or recovered by taking money out of a potential tax refund. The ATO wouldn't waste time and resources pursuing such a small debt.

They're 2 completely different scenarios TBH. You keep bring up residents and non-residents. As it stands, it's completely irrelevant. If Centrelink are directed by the ATO to reduce pensions (which I extremely doubt will happen), the amount won't matter, it will just be done. If that is done, again highly unlikely IMO, there will not be a debt, just a reduction in pensions. I keep telling you this and you haven't grasped the concept. Residency and non-residency is an ATO issue, not a Centrelink one.

Two cracking games to start the round off. Brisbane pretty much threw that game away. Only really needed one more goal after Daniher's put them 23 points up. They then decided to play safe and just kept going up the line. Then it looked as if they panicked and just tried to save it.

This is the part I quoted.

The Yankee versions usually never are IMO.

Some people on here have said they don't expect the ATO to target pensioners, not Centrelink. Not going there again. You seem to be confusing Centrelink and the ATO's duties. It's not up to Centrelink to chase residents or non-residents. They will chase people owing debts to them. Residency and non-residency status will be determined by the ATO, but It's no use going down that rabbit hole again.

Accused Enjoying this one at the moment. This is the UK series not the US one. Created by Jimmy McGovern, each episode of this series examines a person who is accused of a crime and what led them to end up in the Dock.

Sky Coppers Sky Coppers is a brand new show, which shows Behind the Scenes of the West Midlands Police Drone Unit, hunting criminals from the sky. This brand-new police investigation series follows the work of the West Midlands Police Drone Unit. Drone tech is a specialist ultra-modern tool helping officers in their investigations as they track criminals from the sky.

That's just silly. There's heap of genuine stuff on Lazada if you know where to look. People looking at stuff that's 10% of retail price and thinking they're genuine only have themselves to blame.

I think the mid-season sacking is because they're into Hardwick. Hardwick and Dimma are good mates. I imagine Dimma wouldn't talk to GC whilst Dew was still there. GC were expected to play finals and have gone backwards again. Would prefer to see the AFL get rid of them but that won't happen.

That's it for round 17 gents. A few picked 7 but the Picnic bars this week go to Scea who picked 8. Well done Big Fella. Until next time.

A premiership puts you ahead though Uncle Alex.