ballpoint

Pity he stole them in the first place.

There's nothing stopping him from releasing his own copy already, along with the inventory of items removed that he already has. Maybe he's doing a bit of "Sharpie-editing" to both before doing so, and then screaming that the DOJ documents and his own don't match.

Leaning forward in his SUV, trying to grab the steering wheel, and shouting "Take me to Moscow!!!"

I went to a dyslexic barbecue today. We all stood in a line and waited to get our hair cut.

I'm off to grow some facial hair... Must dash!

A vegetarian looked at my burger and said, "You know, a cow died so you could have that burger". Mid-bite, I looked at his salad and responded, "Maybe it died because you keep eating all its food!"

A bloke in hospital is recovering from laser eye surgery. The surgeon comes in and asks if he wants the good news or the bad news first. The bloke excitedly asks for the good news. The surgeon says, "Well, you are about to get a new dog!"

I bought a punnet of strawberries and looked to the internet for the best way to serve them. It suggested that I halve the strawberries, dust with icing sugar and pile cream on top. Don't do this!!! Pile cream tastes disgusting.

A Glaswegian takes his new girlfriend home to introduce to his parents "This is Amanda". Its f***in' what??!!" shouts his father.

Funnily enough, that was exactly my question when he took the time to reply to your post.

Amazing prescience:

A question for those who insist the 90 day report must be done by the end of every 90 day period, regardless of whether you have left the country and returned in the meantime. What would you do if you were out of the country when your 90 day report came due? Since there seems to be no connection between the online system and actual border immigration control, it's likely the reminder email would still be sent. Would you still report online and continue 90 days after that once returning? If not, (which I assume would be the case, as it would be somewhat ridiculous to report that you have spent 90 days in the country when you aren't actually in the country - but then again, it seems somewhat ridiculous to report that you have spent 90 days in the country when you weren't in the country over some of that period), then how would you reconcile the gap in your 90 day reporting? When would you do your next one? 90 days after your arrival date?

Not regular Fox contributor Alan Dershowitz? Not the Alan Dershowitz who "was a member of Harvey Weinstein's defense team in 2018 and of President Donald Trump's defense team in his first impeachment trial in 2020. He was a member of Jeffrey Epstein's defense team and helped to negotiate a 2006 non-prosecution agreement on Epstein's behalf." Alan Dershowitz - Wikipedia Now, not only are people denying they're Trump supporters, they are also denying that members of Trump's former legal team are Trump supporters. Someone should have warned him. (By the way, That's fine company Trump is in).

I've never seen that safe before! Well, maybe I met it once or twice. But I never liked it! Believe me, I know safes, I only buy the best safes, and that is the worst safe I've ever met!

You can bet that they won't have received any news about how the war is going either, so probably believe that they will simply be marching in triumph to Kyiv and beyond. The Ukrainians should be getting ready to receive multiple defections from the Russian side. Indeed, should be encouraging them with broadcasts. Make a few in Korean too, should the story about 100,000 North Korean "volunteers" prove to be true. "Come to the West, brothers. Freedom, a pair of Levi's, and a can of Coca-Cola for every one who joins us".

This thread needs to be archived and written up as a case study in a psychiatric journal. The level of "what-aboutery" and obfuscation displayed is classic denial behaviour. We've had: "But, but, Biden" (both Hunter and Joe). "I'm not a Trump supporter but... (followed by support for Trump). "This will be great for Trump in the next election! Ha, ha, ha (but those are not tears of laughter we detect). "The boss of the FBI, who was a Biden appointee should be investigated! No, not that boss, the other one! Which one? Whichever one was appointed by Biden!" "This (fact that shows that the rule of law still exists in America, or at least is making a comeback after being crushed by the Trump Presidency, by pointing out that no one is above the law) will only make other countries think that America is a banana republic". "This sets a bad precedent!" (No, but it may convict a bad president). Not one post from the Trump supporters, whether open or not so open about that status, discussing what could be in the papers that were taken away, or whether he was wrong to be in possession of classified material - which can't be denied because they already retrieved such material from him back in February, when he'd already left the Whitehouse. Just what-abouts, denials, and but, but, buts. And that's why it will be extremely difficult to bridge this divide.

Or, internet lunatics exposed by internet analytics.

One day, two deputies in the Sheriff’s Office answered an emergency call at a farmhouse. When they walked in, they found the nude bodies of a man and a woman in the bedroom. They had been shot to death. When they went to the living room, they found the body of a man with a gun at his side. “No doubt about it,” one deputy said to the other. “This was a double murder and suicide. This guy came home, found his wife in bed with somebody else, and shot them both. Then he shot himself.” “You’re right,” the other deputy replied. “Double murder and suicide. But I’ll bet you when the sheriff gets here he’s going to say ‘it could have been worse.” “No way. How could it be worse? There are three people in the house, and all of them have been shot to death. It couldn’t be worse. You’re on.” About that time, the old sheriff arrived at the scene. He walked into the bedroom and saw the two nude bodies. He then walked into the living room and saw the man on the floor with the gun by his side. “No doubt about it,” the sheriff said, shaking his head. “It was a double murder and suicide. This guy came home, found his wife in bed with somebody else, and shot them both. Then he shot himself.” After hesitating for a moment, the old sheriff looked his deputies squarely in the eyes. “But, you know,” he said, “it could have been worse.” The deputy who had lost the bet jumped up and shouted, “Sheriff, how could it have been worse? There are three people in this farmhouse, and all three of them are dead. It couldn’t have been worse??” “Yes it could,” the sheriff retorted. “You see that guy there on the floor? If he had come home yesterday, that would be me in that bed!”