.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
LevelHead
-
Posts
882 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by LevelHead
-
-
Red leaders threaten to shoot "bang fai" (home-made festival rockets) at Rajprasong buildings if troops move in.
http://www.twitter.com/tulsathit
very peaceful these reds '
Propaganda and spin again.
Reds said they would fire them at helicopters if they are attacked by helicopters.
They said that some may fall down on nearby buildings if that happens.
Whoever is twittering this nonsense should change their name to "BS merchant" perhaps ?
-
..... you are making a claim that a so-called "PAD/yellow/Multicolor" group are going to attack, with weapons and guns, the poor, innocent reds. What is your source? You don't have one. You're a liar. Or a fake Red. One of the two. Which one?
Why a 'fake Red' and why just one of the two? Why not a real Red and a liar?
Lying is not something Reds are adverse to. Look at their patron saint and paymaster. The only way to tell he's lying is if he's moving his lips and there are sounds coming out.
The people who lie appear to be in power ?
No live ammo - oh, that was a lie.
Change that.
Yes live ammo but only fired in air.
Whoops, video of firing at crowds.
Change it quick, live ammo fired in air and only in self defense.
Whoops, now appear Japanese camera man shot by army and still got those 19 dead reds.....
Next lie will be ?????????
-
Yep, you now know why the Reds erected all the bamboo barricades.
To keep the violent PAD/Yellow/Multicolors out.
The PAD want to invoke violence, they will try tonight it seems.
Hope the barricades hold or many will be killed due to PAD starting violence against Reds.
If the PAD went to Khon Kaen and starting sleeping and pissing in the streets I'm sure it would take less than a month for an angry mob to form and kick them out. Reds have been begging for violence and they'll keep being A-holes till they get it.
Official police figures.
70% of reds are Bangkok residents.
-
LeavelHead - let it please get into your head: There was no violence created by the Yellows - there were deaths created by the then Somchai government who ordered fighting against peaceful demonstrators with 15 years old teargas containers. And if you think Chamlong Srimuang is a violent man - google the name.
What about the people killed by the Yellows at Don Muang airport ?
Man suspected of being under cover policeman KILLED by PAD guards.
http://thainews.prd.go.th/en/news.php?id=255112100004
.
-
Its FACT.
The PAD/Yellow/Multicolor are now there "taunting" the Reds and trying to incite violence.
FACT.
It is pre-meditated with intent.
Therefore if people die tonight or the following days, it IS MURDER and this is pre-meditated action to incite violence and death.
Troll, troll, troll, troll.
Check the latest updates - Nation feed.
PAD/Yellow/Multi's now very close to reds.
They went to reds, not reds to them.
They went to incite the reds.
They are to blame.
-
Yep, you now know why the Reds erected all the bamboo barricades.
To keep the violent PAD/Yellow/Multicolors out.
The PAD want to invoke violence, they will try tonight it seems.
Hope the barricades hold or many will be killed due to PAD starting violence against Reds.
You do not like it as its TRUE and FACT.
There are now groups of PAD/Yellow/Multicolor trying to incite violence.
They have gone to the Reds area.
They are being aggressive.
They want to incite violence.
If people die tonight or in the next few days due to this "pre-meditated" action by PAD/Yellow/Multi then the organizers of it should be tried for murder.
-
Actually with all the rumors, hidden agendas, whispering and false starts, this whole thing is getting boring... everytime you hear the army is going to attack and they don't it's like Chicken Little crying "the sky is falling." Or else, Nattawut says he is going to take the red shirts picnicking at Silom and then he doesn't... ZZzzzzzzzzz
However, having said that... here are today's rumors/facts:
1. Rajaprasong employees told to go home early
2. Major hotels CLOSED today
3. Chidlom Road closed for a while
4. Tons of messages from Facebook saying Judgement Day is 9:00pm tonight
5. Scattered skirmishes between multi-colored protesters and red shirts
Which all could add up to a big....................NOTHING!
PAD/Yellow/Multicolor are said to be going to attack tonight or in the next couple of days with guns and weapons and the intent to incite death and kill some of their own people, then demand the army take action against the reds.
Remember, the PAD are going to start the fight.
Not the reds, not the army..... those PAD/Yellow (now hiding in multicolor).
The violent parliament shutting, airport shutting, killing people at Don Muang airport bunch, all return again.
Just remember this, for after it all happens those to blame with premeditated intent are the PAD.
you are already making excuses for the reds , what a lot of BS the only people to blame are thaksin and his thugs.
Its FACT.
The PAD/Yellow/Multicolor are now there "taunting" the Reds and trying to incite violence.
FACT.
It is pre-meditated with intent.
Therefore if people die tonight or the following days, it IS MURDER and this is pre-meditated action to incite violence and death.
-
Actually with all the rumors, hidden agendas, whispering and false starts, this whole thing is getting boring... everytime you hear the army is going to attack and they don't it's like Chicken Little crying "the sky is falling." Or else, Nattawut says he is going to take the red shirts picnicking at Silom and then he doesn't... ZZzzzzzzzzz
However, having said that... here are today's rumors/facts:
1. Rajaprasong employees told to go home early
2. Major hotels CLOSED today
3. Chidlom Road closed for a while
4. Tons of messages from Facebook saying Judgement Day is 9:00pm tonight
5. Scattered skirmishes between multi-colored protesters and red shirts
Which all could add up to a big....................NOTHING!
PAD/Yellow/Multicolor are said to be going to attack tonight or in the next couple of days with guns and weapons and the intent to incite death and kill some of their own people, then demand the army take action against the reds.
Remember, the PAD are going to start the fight.
Not the reds, not the army..... those PAD/Yellow (now hiding in multicolor).
The violent parliament shutting, airport shutting, killing people at Don Muang airport bunch, all return again.
Just remember this, for after it all happens those to blame with premeditated intent are the PAD.
-
Whats the problem, the Army are not there to attack the people.
The Army work for the people.
The people pay for their weapons and wages.
So why should the army get upset, better to have a few beers and a laugh and enjoy a little rest.
Peace and goodwill to all.
-
Twitter link
Ppl who are not involved. Stay the xxxx out of silom tonight till after 9 am tmmrw. Trust me on this.
Yep, you now know why the Reds erected all the bamboo barricades.
To keep the violent PAD/Yellow/Multicolors out.
The PAD want to invoke violence, they will try tonight it seems.
Hope the barricades hold or many will be killed due to PAD starting violence against Reds.
-
Propaganda backlash alert.
Damage to Thailand image might be more soon.
Abhisit and Suthep going into panic mode ?
Being reported now that forensic reports say the Japanese camera man shot dead WAS SHOT BY THE MILITARY SIDE.
Panic for Mark ahead - spin coming ?
You spin me right round baby right round.... Where was the report. Better see it quick before its banned.
In Khao Sod (Thai paper), now on Breaking News of the other English language news paper of Bangkok (that cannot be mentioned on here).
Marky mark, spin it baby.........
-
Being reported now, confirmation from forensic exams that the Japanese reporter was shot dead BY THE MILITARY SIDE, not the red side.
WHOOPS, oh dear, all those lies and propaganda are coming back to haunt now ??
Abhisit, you must step down surely ? or is there to be more of this nonsense. Perhaps a solider in "self defense" of not wanting to get caught on film shooting people shot the camera man, is that "self defense" and so ok Mark ?
-
Propaganda backlash alert.
Damage to Thailand image might be more soon.
Abhisit and Suthep going into panic mode ?
Being reported now that forensic reports say the Japanese camera man shot dead WAS SHOT BY THE MILITARY SIDE.
Panic for Mark ahead - spin coming ?
-
Typical of a propaganda machine.
Forget those who are dead. Ignore them.
Forget those injured. Ignore them
Concentrate on a few people inconvenienced by losing some money - that sounds good and anti-reds, headline it.
Sad people.
The dead certainly don't seem forgotten.
The government is organising aid for their families, private citizen are organising themselves as to support the injured.
Of course it's not propaganda to walk into a discussion and try to derail the fact people aren't able to earn a living for themselves anymore, that many people don't feel safe going to work into that area but still do because they need to earn a living.
I'm worried about how many more will die when these people who suddenly have no more income turn around and decide to take that out on the red's.
Wait, what's this... multicoloured shirts attack reds? Hmmm could this be relevant somehow?
But have you seen reports on the dead protestors in the media ? On the TV ?
All those injured Reds, they are not on TV or in the papers ?
Looks like a total whitewash cover up is going on.
Media seems to have forgotten them totally, or are they under strict orders to only show soldiers ?
Seems like lots of "propaganda" going on.
Lots of independent media got lots of video of what happened, and its now said to be circulating Thailand on VCD.
Propaganda always backfires..... and from what I hear and see, it is big time.
Lots of neutral people asking why so many people killed by the army ? why was it not shown on TV ? why did the papers not talk about it ? Why did the army use live rounds ? Who ordered the use of force ?
Thats what you call a serious backfire.
-
That is what he has done.
He said "could be held in 9 months" but "first must change the constitution".
Exactly. He would not call an election, because he would say his "IF" has not been satisfied.
It was a total bull offer, everyone can see that, apart from the Yellow clad people who knew exactly what he was doing.
He did not offer a date. He simply said "could be before year end, could be in 9 months" BUT ONLY IF I CAN CHANGE the constitution first.
His offer was clear, until he is allowed to change the constitution then there will be no election, and the delay will be due then to "those opposed" to constitutional change.
Do you really think the reds are that stupid to get suckered in to that one ? I would have laughed at them if they fell for that.
There are plenty of reds (such as yourself) that have been suckered in to believing everything that is on Red TV ...
But, since the reds haven't sat down to negotiate again, it doesn't really matter what Abhisit has said. As it stands, elections will be in Dec 2011 as scheduled. The constitution will be changed before that.
There is not any Red TV. Its all been banned by the government for a long time, there no longer is freedom of the media in Thailand, only a Yellow run propaganda machine.
Where is this Red TV ? What are they saying ? Its banned to all in Thailand. Only Yellow TV is allowed and pro-Yellow TV, and pro-Yellow newsprint ?
I just get my information talking to Thai people, real ones.
There has never been a free and not-loaded with "IFS" offer an election any sooner than Dec 2011. And we can be quite sure if the Yellow side has not managed to change the constitution by then there will be no election then either, there will be a coup in Nov 2011 to prevent the elections.
Team Yellow does not want elections now, they only want them once they rig the constitution so that Team Yellow wins every election, then you can have them as often as you want.
Its called "New Politics".
"New" meaning that whatever the people vote, only the Elite favored politicians will ever be in power ever again.
-
Typical of a propaganda machine.
Forget those who are dead. Ignore them.
Forget those injured. Ignore them
Concentrate on a few people inconvenienced by losing some money - that sounds good and anti-reds, headline it.
Sad people.
-
He has loaded the "9 months" with the proviso he and his Yellow mates can change the constitution BEFORE THE ELECTION, NO CHANGE THEN NO ELECTION.
What simple part of that can people not understand ??????
He said "9 months IF........"
Sorry, I don't believe this. If a date is set for an election there requires to be months of planning from the authorities, as well as campaigning from the parties. If, for whatever reason, changes were not able to be made to the constitution, Abhisit, no matter what provisos he may have agreed on with the reds, would not simply be able to say "ok, sorry folks, that election i promised has been cancelled". Wouldn't happen.
That is what he has done.
He said "could be held in 9 months" but "first must change the constitution".
Exactly. He would not call an election, because he would say his "IF" has not been satisfied.
It was a total bull offer, everyone can see that, apart from the Yellow clad people who knew exactly what he was doing.
He did not offer a date. He simply said "could be before year end, could be in 9 months" BUT ONLY IF I CAN CHANGE the constitution first.
His offer was clear, until he is allowed to change the constitution then there will be no election, and the delay will be due then to "those opposed" to constitutional change.
Do you really think the reds are that stupid to get suckered in to that one ? I would have laughed at them if they fell for that.
-
I think the guy's doing a marvellous job under VERY difficult circumstances and I hope he'll manage to stay the course and see off the Red Shirt thugs.
I just wish we had a politician like him to run the UK - an honest, decent man who obviously loves his country and is trying to do his very best to govern fairly but firmly and will not give way to violent mobs backed by terrorists.
Why on earth can the Red Shirts not wait till later in the year for the elections that have been promised? Is Thaksin down to his last few billions?
The Yellow lies continue.
Abhisit HAS NOT OFFERED election in 9 months as a stand alone item.
He has said, we can have them in 9 months BUT I MUST CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION FIRST.
He has loaded the "9 months" with the proviso he and his Yellow mates can change the constitution BEFORE THE ELECTION, NO CHANGE THEN NO ELECTION.
What simple part of that can people not understand ??????
He said "9 months IF........"
Now, its already been said, there was a general agreement to amend some parts of the constitution, however, following the loss of the by-elections by BJT the Democrats and BJT and the other coalition partners suddenly wanted to CHANGE THE ELECTION LAWS.
Changes that would mean small parties get more votes and PTP (PPP) get much less.
Now you see why Abhisit and his yellow mates want to change the constitution - they want to rig the election so that PTP cannot win.
Now do you understand why PTP say "no" to amending the constitution now ?
And do you see why Abhisit loaded his "9 months" with the "I MUST CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION FIRST".
In effect he was saying "You are not getting elections unless we can make sure you lose".
All this "9 months" talk is stupid, he never offered it on its own. Do not let the biased propaganda merchants lead you into thinking he offered elections to the reds and that was that, he did not, he offered them 9 months only if he can make changes to ensure PTP lose the election by rigging it so his smaller party coalition members can win more seats by changing the way elections are held.
It was all a big CON and pumped by the propaganda machine.
Man, you sure are educated. Probably have a degree in political science you say what you did. Do youu expect the problem to be solve with just a election with the current constitution? Get real man, if the house dissolve, the yellow would just rise up and continue this mess, is that what you want. Or do you want the yellow to rise so you can finally crush them. Cos that's what you'll have to do. The 9months might be along time, what would be best would be to have it so that once the constitution is changed (with agreement from all party involve), then hold the election on the premise that the winner wouldn't change the constitution for another 4 years. That way if either side win, they'll have to follow the same constitution. With the guarantee that they loser won't challenge the results for some idiotic reasons.
You, sir, are just not think this through and follow the rhetoric of the red's leader like a sheep. Think more than just the immediate future, but to solve this mess.
LOL -
You miss the point.
The 1997 constitution said that coups could no longer happen. Treason offense.
So they had a coup and threw the constitution in the bin to overcome it. This is what sore losers do, change and abuse the rules to get themselves back into power and then when in power change the rules to keep them in power.
Your suggestion falls down at the first hurdle, because the army at any time if the reds win the election can hold another coup and throw the new constitution into the bin, to allow changes again.
Do you see the problem with the Yellow side, they use the army to overcome the constitution. So what is the point changing it ?
There is no point changing it now.
LEAVE IT ALONE or put the already agreed "Peoples Constitution of 1997" back into place.
All that the Yellow side are trying to do now is change the constitution such that "their friends" always win elections, therefore no need for any more coups or any more changes to the constitution. That is akin to rampant corruption and a dictatorship.
And you want that to happen ?
-
The Yellow lies continue.
Abhisit HAS NOT OFFERED election in 9 months as a stand alone item.
He has said, we can have them in 9 months BUT I MUST CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION FIRST.
He has loaded the "9 months" with the proviso he and his Yellow mates can change the constitution BEFORE THE ELECTION, NO CHANGE THEN NO ELECTION.
What simple part of that can people not understand ??????
He said "9 months IF........"
Now, its already been said, there was a general agreement to amend some parts of the constitution, however, following the loss of the by-elections by BJT the Democrats and BJT and the other coalition partners suddenly wanted to CHANGE THE ELECTION LAWS.
Changes that would mean small parties get more votes and PTP (PPP) get much less.
Now you see why Abhisit and his yellow mates want to change the constitution - they want to rig the election so that PTP cannot win.
Now do you understand why PTP say "no" to amending the constitution now ?
And do you see why Abhisit loaded his "9 months" with the "I MUST CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION FIRST".
In effect he was saying "You are not getting elections unless we can make sure you lose".
All this "9 months" talk is stupid, he never offered it on its own. Do not let the biased propaganda merchants lead you into thinking he offered elections to the reds and that was that, he did not, he offered them 9 months only if he can make changes to ensure PTP lose the election by rigging it so his smaller party coalition members can win more seats by changing the way elections are held.
It was all a big CON and pumped by the propaganda machine.
Abhisit has actually said that the constitution should be changed with input from all sides - government, reds, and other community groups. And then to be voted for by the people in a referendum.
What have the reds offered?
IF they get into power, they will change it to suit them. Not for the benefit of all Thais. Just for the benefit of their corrupt practices and their corrupt leader.
edit: levelhead, you should watch more than just Red TV.
If its not broken, do not fix it.
You have avoided the MAIN ISSUE, and that was the Abhisit loaded the 9 months with an "IF".
His 9 month offer was total bull, due to his loading of it with "I must change the constitution first".
Lets not forget, after Songkran 2009 they set up committees and commissions to look into "everything" and from "all sides" and offer suggestions.
Every recommendation was ignored by Abhisit and the Yellows. It made all the "talk or reconciliation" to be revealed as just more bull.
How can anyone think their "constitution" talks will be anything different. Everyone knows their desires are to rig all future elections so they will always be the majority and PTP cannot win a majority.
So, get back on track.
Abhisit did not offer elections this year or in 9 months - on it own, he loaded it with lots of IFS and IFS he knows that the opposition cannot accept. Its the same as offering nothing. He is hollow and empty, a puppet on a string and with stained hands should resign.
-
I think the guy's doing a marvellous job under VERY difficult circumstances and I hope he'll manage to stay the course and see off the Red Shirt thugs.
I just wish we had a politician like him to run the UK - an honest, decent man who obviously loves his country and is trying to do his very best to govern fairly but firmly and will not give way to violent mobs backed by terrorists.
Why on earth can the Red Shirts not wait till later in the year for the elections that have been promised? Is Thaksin down to his last few billions?
The Yellow lies continue.
Abhisit HAS NOT OFFERED election in 9 months as a stand alone item.
He has said, we can have them in 9 months BUT I MUST CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION FIRST.
He has loaded the "9 months" with the proviso he and his Yellow mates can change the constitution BEFORE THE ELECTION, NO CHANGE THEN NO ELECTION.
What simple part of that can people not understand ??????
He said "9 months IF........"
Now, its already been said, there was a general agreement to amend some parts of the constitution, however, following the loss of the by-elections by BJT the Democrats and BJT and the other coalition partners suddenly wanted to CHANGE THE ELECTION LAWS.
Changes that would mean small parties get more votes and PTP (PPP) get much less.
Now you see why Abhisit and his yellow mates want to change the constitution - they want to rig the election so that PTP cannot win.
Now do you understand why PTP say "no" to amending the constitution now ?
And do you see why Abhisit loaded his "9 months" with the "I MUST CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION FIRST".
In effect he was saying "You are not getting elections unless we can make sure you lose".
All this "9 months" talk is stupid, he never offered it on its own. Do not let the biased propaganda merchants lead you into thinking he offered elections to the reds and that was that, he did not, he offered them 9 months only if he can make changes to ensure PTP lose the election by rigging it so his smaller party coalition members can win more seats by changing the way elections are held.
It was all a big CON and pumped by the propaganda machine.
-
The trouble is here the "want to change the constitution argument".
The 1997 "Peoples Constitution" is fine. It was until the Army threw it into the bin in 2006 and put in place their "flawed" version.
What should happen is the 1997 one should be put back into place. Everyone was happy with that for 9 years.
The only reason the Army had to bin it is that under it a coup is a treason offense, so to get around treason they had to get rid of the constitution.
Now, the Democrats and their coalition partners want to "amend" the electoral law. Basically they want to change the way MP's are elected such that PTP (PPP/TRT) can never win again. They want to take all high seat constituencies where PTP get lots of MP's and take them down to being just 1 MP.
So, you can imagine that this so called "amend the constitution" is never going to happen. This is why the 9 months, 6 months offers are just bull, as they all say "after amending" and there is no way that its ever going to be amended.
This is why the Reds simply rejected all the fake offers from Abhisit so far. They know he is insincere the moment he and his cohorts say " ? months AFTER amending the constitution".
I am sure if he said "put back the 1997 one and have an election in 6 months" then all Reds would be happy.
But he does not and always says that the constitution must be amended prior to any new election. Thats his "lets never have an election" clause.
Therefore, he should resign. He should have months back.
He has shown himself to be everything but a leader, and 100% to be a puppet on a string. He now has blood on his hands via his decisions as PM.
The Democrats are scared stiff of elections and they should be, their actions of the last few weeks has lost them the support of many many more voters. Under the 1997 or the new constitution the Democrats and their coalition partners will now get stuffed completely in any election.
Therefore they have to try to hold off and not have elections (make fake promises with preset conditions that cannot be met) and must push to amend the present constitution in order to try to let them win more seats.
TRT/PPP won the last god knows how many elections under the 1997 and the present constitution, the Elite/Yellows see the only way of ensuring they do not again is to rig the election by changing the elections laws under the constitution (you know the kind of nonsense - present system 3M voters elect 10 MP's - they want changes so 3M red voters now elect 1 MP and 100 Yellow supporters elect 10 MP's).
So constitutional amendment is never going to be agreed, which is why you see how hollow Abhisit's offers were of elections, as he always tied on "but we must amend the constitution first"
Hollow man - should resign, should have resigned earlier and all these people would not be dead.
CMF, you miss the point.
Abhisit and the Democrats DO NOT WANT AN ELECTION under the 1997 or the present constitution as they know they will lose.
This is why they refuse to have an election.
Its also why they insist the constitution must be changed prior to any election, they want to change it so they can win it by altering the rules.
Do not confuse the general want to change some parts of the constitution, with the new Democrat/Coalition demands to change the electoral laws/rules part of it.
PPP/PTP wanted to change agreed parts of the constitution BUT REFUSED TO COOPERATE further once the Dems/Elite demanded electoral law/rules change.
This is why there are problems, the Dems/Elite do not want to lose anymore elections so are offering all the banned MP's the chance to come back IF THEY SELL THEIR SOULS and allow the Dems/Elite to change the rules so PPP/PTP can never win again and always in future Dems will win every election.
The offer to them is of course "You can come back but we will always win after the changes, so hel_l, why not come back and join us and then we all win then".
Corruption - of the highest order ?
This is why PTP are opposed any constitutional amendments now, as the Dems want changes to ensure they alone are the major party in any future coalition governments.
Each aspect of this "fight" is very easy to understand, if you lift the hood and look under it, for each of the issues and grievances.
The major factor though is the Elite do not want Democracy, they are happy with a fake version, so long as they are in control of the puppet governments, but they never again want real democracy where they have no control over parliament through backdoor influence. Thats why they held a coup in 2006.
-
The trouble is here the "want to change the constitution argument".
The 1997 "Peoples Constitution" is fine. It was until the Army threw it into the bin in 2006 and put in place their "flawed" version.
What should happen is the 1997 one should be put back into place. Everyone was happy with that for 9 years.
The only reason the Army had to bin it is that under it a coup is a treason offense, so to get around treason they had to get rid of the constitution.
Now, the Democrats and their coalition partners want to "amend" the electoral law. Basically they want to change the way MP's are elected such that PTP (PPP/TRT) can never win again. They want to take all high seat constituencies where PTP get lots of MP's and take them down to being just 1 MP.
So, you can imagine that this so called "amend the constitution" is never going to happen. This is why the 9 months, 6 months offers are just bull, as they all say "after amending" and there is no way that its ever going to be amended.
This is why the Reds simply rejected all the fake offers from Abhisit so far. They know he is insincere the moment he and his cohorts say " ? months AFTER amending the constitution".
I am sure if he said "put back the 1997 one and have an election in 6 months" then all Reds would be happy.
But he does not and always says that the constitution must be amended prior to any new election. Thats his "lets never have an election" clause.
Therefore, he should resign. He should have months back.
He has shown himself to be everything but a leader, and 100% to be a puppet on a string. He now has blood on his hands via his decisions as PM.
The Democrats are scared stiff of elections and they should be, their actions of the last few weeks has lost them the support of many many more voters. Under the 1997 or the new constitution the Democrats and their coalition partners will now get stuffed completely in any election.
Therefore they have to try to hold off and not have elections (make fake promises with preset conditions that cannot be met) and must push to amend the present constitution in order to try to let them win more seats.
TRT/PPP won the last god knows how many elections under the 1997 and the present constitution, the Elite/Yellows see the only way of ensuring they do not again is to rig the election by changing the elections laws under the constitution (you know the kind of nonsense - present system 3M voters elect 10 MP's - they want changes so 3M red voters now elect 1 MP and 100 Yellow supporters elect 10 MP's).
So constitutional amendment is never going to be agreed, which is why you see how hollow Abhisit's offers were of elections, as he always tied on "but we must amend the constitution first"
Hollow man - should resign, should have resigned earlier and all these people would not be dead.
-
Second laugh of the day was the :
Utter panic at the suggestions of Chavilit and Somchai.
Wow, the Yellow PR machine went into mass panic mode about that suggestion and all sorts of Yellow come out of the woodwork to say no to it.
Everyone I spoke to (Thai's) had no problems with their idea and said it was good and would stop the bad elements of the Democrats/Army from killing more people.
Yet the Yellow PR machine says nobody would agree with it.
In fact I did not find anyone who disagreed with it.
-
Well, the "double standards" and hypocrisy of the present regime continues.
Laugh of the day.
No demonstration in Silom was said !
No groups of people !
Will use tear gas and if necessary live ammo !
What happens ?
Multi-colour shirts take over Silom, have anti-Thaksin protest and yet the Army and government does nothing !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So yet another broad daylight "double standard". The Army yesterday should have dispersed instantly the multi-colours. Failure to do so shows there is a political agenda only and the SOE is being used in an unfair manner for the political gain of the government.
Thats abuse of power and against the constitution.
Red-Shirts Blockade Thai Military Train
in Thailand News
Posted
If you notice my post (the OP) it says "tonight or the following days".
Lets wait and see what they do tonight and in the following few days first.