Jump to content

youreavinalaff

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    4,141
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by youreavinalaff

  1. It's about the same distance from Japan.πŸ˜…πŸ˜…πŸ˜…
  2. I do understand you. That's why I've attempted to steer you in the right direction. You didn't follow. Never mind.
  3. Once again I'll tell you, they are not praying to a God. They know that. They don't think any differently. Buddhism is spiritual. They are praying to the good spirits. The rest of your post us a rant that could be about any country. Some good people, some not so good.
  4. The article has links to back up its findings. The links are part of the article. Shame on the Linkman not to adhere to his own principles.
  5. I understood perfectly. The Thais understand too. They know it's nota religion. They don't worship a God.
  6. Pedantry? I suggested you hadn't read the whole article, including the link to the source. You replied "I did read the whole article, hence my comment" The link to the source takes you to a 136 page report. The time difference between your post and my reply and your subsequent reply, was only minutes. You did not read it.
  7. In reference to your first sentence, in relation to my question, you clearly didn't.
  8. That's a good chuckle. Thanks. You clearly are unaware of the roots of Bhuddism and how its evolved in different ways. Also, it's not considered a religion.
  9. I guess you didn't read the whole article. Including the link to the source of the research. Never mind. It's well known you prefer to rely on what the Guardian says.
  10. It was actually the Guardian. Here is a more balanced, less sensationslist article. https://www.cps.gov.uk/cps/news/cps-leaders-welcome-final-findings-academic-report-prosecution-rape
  11. That explains everything. The kids are smarter than the you. That's why you are on hear getting advice.
  12. If you read the whole quote, you'll see why part of it was left out by those trying to make something out if a 5 year old conversation.
  13. This whole thread is based on a truncated quote. Truncated, no doubt, for effect.
  14. The issue started at home. The girls should never have been on the motorbike. How many times they've been seen by police, I don't know. Teaching fear of lack of safety would work better. Have TV adverts with graphic images. Have leaflets handed out at garages, motor cycle shops and hospitals showing graphic images of what can happen if safety measures are not followed. Show prople road safety us not only a matter of law for the police to enforce.
  15. A sad life. Getting satisfaction by watching others in difficulty. Especially when involving family. I guess you have your own issues and gloating at others makes you feel better.
  16. Riveting? For someone who doesn't give a flying fig? Make up your mind. Personally, if a Mum wants to edit a photo of her and her kids, why not? If some people looking at the photo don't like it or think there is some hidden agenda, tough s%$t.
  17. It's a good job the East German, female Olympians of the 70s and 80s weren't. Not a clean shave amongst them. 😁😁
  18. You were off the subject when you quoted my comment. Try to keep up with the thread. That way, you'll not end up looking foolish.
  19. You like to go on about me having been an English teacher so, let me explain. Your question asks about "the competition". That was whilst quoting my mention of the Olympics. That in turn was in reply to you questioning if there have ever been any rules regarding gender of competitors. So, we were on the subject of the Olympics, off topic or not, and you were joining in. Now, you say I'm wrong whilst quoting text regarding the golf tournament. To be clear, although you often use ambiguity in your posts as a wriggle, you need to go back and add "golf" to your question, therefore getting tge question to match your wriggling answer.
  20. I think you'll find I was replying to you off topic post on another subject. Once again................here we go.
  21. Yes, it is. No confirmation of being a female, no admittance to the competition.
  22. No. There are rules for same sex sports. It wasn't that long ago, late 70s early 80s, female Olympians needed a "sex certificate" in order to compete. That's all is needed now. Carry a sex certificate for gender at birth. That's the competition you join. Simple.
Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...