youreavinalaff

You keep adding to the identities. Originally it was friends aren't terrorists. Then friends who have not been identified as terrorists. Then English friends who........ That's not maths. It's wrigglework. No bonus. Unless there's one for repetition.

Moved the goalposts again. Why not just admit it? You can't back up your comment. Simple.

The laws of probability doesn't say anything about impossibility. If everyone used your calculations, many would be surprised to find they are in the minority. This is a thread about Britain. Please use British English. Please tell how you know none of your friends have never committed a terrorist act.

Still no answer.

An expected kind of response. ie. No answer to the question.

Yes, blunder. You attempted to rectify it by adding " been identified". I asked "how do you know?" in reference to you saying none of your friends have committed terrorist attacks. So, I ask again. How do you know none if your friends have never committed terrorist attacks?

Who said anything about being identified? Oh. You did when you realised you'd made a blunder.

How do you know? Next.

We already know you suffer from selective reading. Now we add selective observing and selective reasoning. Selective understanding is not far away.

But you don't agree with that. At least you didn't when I used my "feet on the ground" in supermarkets and in pubs approach.

Oh. I do know about politics. Galloway is part of a new party. What are their policies? The ones you say he will follow?

Remember to put me on ignore when you set up your next username.

Topic of religion? I'm not.

Not my problem. Seems to be yours.

The topic is "mob rule". I've never mentioned "Macro". You were the one who mentioned culture in Japan and Thailand.

You mean franchised outlets. I see now. Nice to see you are now recognising tribes as part of Thai history and culture You're getting there. But, then again I, always knew you would. You live in a region where no one can afford to shop in Makro.

Said "Pedantic Bignok".

That's strange. You questioned my thoughts on it.

We are talking about the history of Thai culture. The make up of it. The differences. The regionalism of the differences. Not shopping centres or "franchise" food, what ever that is.

You are getting there. You've recognized Laos and Cambodia as having an impact on Thai culture. How about the myriad of others? By the way, there is more to culture than religion, rice, noodles and chilli.

You think history and culture is pedantic? How strange.

Yes, you did.

You need to check the history of Siam. Thailand is multi cultural. I'm not talking about "a few foreigners".

The problem with backing Galloway as an MP on one point, a foreign one at that, is, what's his policy on the Economy? Health?Public services?Taxation?Education? I don't recall him saying much about any of that in his victory speech, other than backing Rochdale FC.

I know he does.