youreavinalaff

The UK is a constitutional monarchy. Not a republic.

Stabbed. Not hacked up. Knife attack. Not machete. Are you suggesting there have never been any teenage child killers of UK citizenship?

Some do. There have been many high profile cases.

Not really. Not when you consider the idea of observational learning. The suspect in the Southport was born and raised initially in Cardiff. An area of 73% white Welsh/British. He would have learnt the values of his peers and integrated. It seems he has a mental condition. A condition that led to him being a recluse. He had no digital footprint. Mental health issues don't discriminate. They can affect any creed, colour or religion.

Or left wing. It's easier not to discriminate in these situations. Anyone pertaining to be on either wing will not spend much time with critical thinking. That's the point of their views. They believe and nothing will change that belief.

More likely Reform voters.

A perfect example of misinformation. Sounds like you you'd benefit from sitting in one of the planned, new classes.

Indeed, however, it's no secret that there is a very large group that belief what they see on social media and disbelieve mainstream media. Even on here we are regularly told not to believe what we read in MSM.

Deported? How do you know they are not British citizens?

£800 million? Per day? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🥰

Not at all. This is a public forum. It's nice to share and to make sure there is no misinformation. That, as we know, can cause problems. If there is something I've said that's ruffled feathers, I can't help that. I've said nothing that is false or there to cause issues.

You really are talking in riddles now. You've clearly made some assumptions about things here. It would appear they are wrong assumptions.

I'm confused with "your lot", meaning my lot. I still don't understand.

"Your lot"? No sure what you mean about that. I don't belong to any "lot". I just can't understand why people use incorrect info to try to make a point. My comment was not condescending either. I'm genuinely relieved you can understand how things work with regards to illegal immigrants and asylum seekers. It's a shame many others can't

Thanks for finally understanding the difference. I can't comment on costs as I've not seen any. Have you?

They don't have grounds for application without documents. They are not given hotel rooms. They are held in detention. It's amazing, when considering the riots that caused suffering to communities across the UK have been caused by misinformation, how many people remain misinformed.

No.

They can't be both. If someone turns up with enough documentation to claim asylum and to have their application considered, they are asylum seekers. Those coming undocumented looking to stay are illegals.

It's not. The example I gave is perfectly effective. The last part of your comment really lets you down. It shows a lack of understanding. However, I like the fact you call homosexuals "perfectly normal".

Once again you are changing the subject. I said it is possible to use "they" in the singular. I gave you an example. If you chose to ignore a simple rule of English, up to you. I suggested you prove me wrong. Not change the example. By suggesting I'm commenting because I'm "woke" just takes you further from the truth that you messed up with simple English grammar. I don't believe people should ask to be called "they". I believe he and she is sufficient when the sex of a person is known. Modern day gender issues seem different and can be confusing to some. However, back to my point. You made an incorrect assumption regarding the use of "they". I pointed that out. You have difficulty accepting you made an error. That's fine but undermines other comments you make.

That's funny, and a very different explanation to your first post. As for picking up typos "I you?" See. It's a simple mistake to make, isn't it? Not nearly as bad as misunderstanding grammar.

You are incorrect. An English program in a Thai school has to follow the same curriculum as non EP. It's all governed by OBEC. It's all aimed at passing the same exams. To the OP, you said the kids know less than you did at their age. There you go. You dound like the perfect candidate to take them to the next level.

Oh dear. I sincerely sympathise. Life must be hard.

55555. That's the best you can do? A typo? You need to try harder. Prove "they" can't be used in singular form. If you can't, I'm perfectly entititled to criticise those that suggest as such.

You suggested "they" should not be used in the singular. Asking " how many Hiltz are there?" My example shows that it can be used in singular form. I pointed out an example of how English works. You were wrong. Plain and simple. My understanding of English is good, thanks. Prove me wrong. Point out my mistakes.