youreavinalaff

I've never counted. Maybe more than I think. I tend not to ask people's religions. Some tell me, others I know from their heritage.

There are some that have been pointed out already.

Or the coincidences visible in this government's dealings.

I agree, so long as it refers to everyone. There have been posts referring to "billions of pounds" of corruption by the previous government but no guilty verdicts. "Innocent until proven guilty" must refer to all, if that the way you want it.

Time will tell. Raynor "forgOt" to declared she shared the apartment in New York.

Aiming blame? It takes two to tango. Your comment, and others blaming Isreal, is the reason this conflict is still ongoing. The minute someone stands up and tells them they are both wrong, that's when the dispute will have half a chance of being settled.

I was referring to the bombings in Gaza. As I wrote. It is my understanding the conflict involves two factions. They both appear to be using bombs. So, as I said, can it be said that all Jews believe the bombings are a good thing? Obviously not. I have Jewish friends. Mostly they are sick and tired of the constant conflicts and want them stopped, any which way. I also have Jewish friends who aren't interested and just go about their daily lives.

What about the other freebies? What about Reeves and Raynor? Did they forget? It's a bit worrying that the three most senior members of UK government have such bad memories.

Then, you clearly read wrong. At no point did I give my opinion. At no point did I mention the Israel. Your selective reading appears to have led you up the garden path. That's why you are confused.

The context. That's what I'm referring to. I made no reference to myself. Hence, your questions are not relevant to my comments.

You're half way there.

That is so funny I spat my coffee out. One thing, how do you know someone is a Muslim just by looking at them? I love Turkey. I've been there many times. South of Thailand is beautiful. Indonesia has some great places. Malaysia is another great place to visit.

Indeed. However, it's still not evidence. Some will believe it, some will believe Farage. There is no evidence to back either. Hence, the dispute of what was said or not said.

You appear to have taken my comment out of context. That's obviously why you cropped it. Quote the whole of my comment, reply to every concept, then I will listen and reply to you.

That's not evidence. It's a dispute.

Because you are disliking many millions of people without knowing them. You are tarring many millions of people with the same brush. Yes. That is, if you are fearing every Muslim just because of their religion. If you believe the old chestnut that all Muslims are potential terrorists or murderers or kiddy fiddlers. If you disbelieve there are many millions of Muslims who feel disdain for Islamic extremists. It's irrational not to understand the difference between Muslims and Islamic Extremeists. Would you believe and publicly state all Irish Catholics are IRA members or all Jews believe the bombings in Gaza are a good thing?

Never "have" won. That appears to be a personal opinion. You don't like those.

Truss wasn't voted in with a majority. She inherited one.

He can be replaced anytime.

That link wasn't defining cities. It was regarding poverty and population density. It also clearly stated a city can have varying populations depending on the how each country defines it. Besides, this is about Thailand. It's how they define their own country that matters.

55555 It's Thai language. It's plain and simple. How many "Ket" do Buriram, Surin or Sissaket have? I'll help you. It's none. That's because "Ket" is a district of a city. Only Bangkok has them. Muang and Nai Muang are only found in "Jangwat" and "Ampher", not cities.

There you go. Nothing about UK. Nothing about the world. Nothing about English language. Nothing about forcing anything on anyone. All about Thai definition. It really is that simple. I'm glad you know understand that.

Muang is the name of the centre of the province. The town. Nai Muang refers to the central sub district within that town. Bangkok, a city, known in its abbreviated Thai form as Krungthepmahanakorn is the city. "Maha" meaning large. Large town translating to City. Just like Samut means sea and Maha Samut means Ocean. I doubt anyone would call the Andaman Sea, an Ocean. I'm not forcing UK or English on anyone. I'm explaining Thai language.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'm not showing off and have, in fact, been thanked for my information.

Nothing to do with UK or USA. As I pointed out in a previous post, Buriram, Surin and Sissaket don't have any cities. As defined in Thai language. You can't call them cities just because they have buses. Prakhonchai, Nang Rong, Lamplaimat, Prasat, Sikhoraphum, Chum Het, Satuk, for examples, have buses. They are not called cities. I'm not keeping on, either. I stated the facts. You keep on ignoring them.