Jump to content

youreavinalaff

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    5,123
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by youreavinalaff

  1. Sex offenders? Not until they've been charged with evidence to back the charge, in the eyes of the law. That's the whole point. I'm sure you'll agree it's wrong to call someone a sex offender when they are not.
  2. No. You clearly maintain that many occupations are low level and that women should be controlled. It's there to see in your posts.
  3. No. This is what you wrote. You'veveven done it again the the above post. "But this woman hating only illustrates that you don’t understand ‘em, so don’t know how to control them." "Them" clearly refers to women andvthe controlling of them.
  4. Control them? That's a form of abuse. Your low opinion of so many people, based on here by sex and occupation, is shocking.
  5. The law is the law and should be abided by. I'm sure you'll agree with that. It's not right for innocent people to be persecuted. I'm sure you'll agree with that too.
  6. On the right track. Hopefully, more countries will follow suit. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-66942145
  7. You are correct. I have the intellect to understand all employees of any business are/should be respected equally.
  8. The subject is abuse of women. Whether it's sexual, physical, mental, financial, verbal....etc, it's wrong. What gives anyone the right to suggest receptionists and other, unnamed occupations, are "low level"? Would you call a woman, or any worker for that matter, "low level" to their face?
  9. You've not read my whole post. I guess that is your privilege, being holier-than-thou and all that.
  10. That's not abuse? I'm sure receptionists around the world would love being labled "low level". So, what other occupations would you, oh so high in society, call "low level"?
  11. They changed the calculation method for predictions into the future to become more believable? ????????????????.
  12. There certainly is. Ork and Awk is the same sound. Pork/Hawk/Dork. Hence my comment that Ork is accurate. Aawk is not.
  13. Thanks for the answer. I'm not that interested in the drivel
  14. No, not a habit of mine. It's simply recognising a habit of yours. I'm not the only one that notices these traits.
  15. Sorry. I forgot your inability to think for yourself or discuss possibilities for the future, other the criticism of those you dislike. You obviously don't believe the two examples I gave are fit to rule. Sort of answering without answering but better that answering with questions. At least you've made you stance clear. Thanks.
  16. Then there are those who resort to smearing and defamation. I haven't been to Pattaya for 23 years. Let's try again, do you live here and can you speak Thai?
  17. I didn't know that. I thought the victors were announced after the election.
  18. In the words of Martin Luther King, Jnr. "I have a dream". Not a big dream. Just a hope really. A hope that maybe, just once, you will answer a question with an answer.
  19. And then there are those that can't answer questions.
  20. Recession? Wasn't that happening 4th quarter of 2022? Interest rates are higher because they were too low. They are now at a realistic level. If Americans, we have a good'un we all love on here, would concentrate on their own country and it's failings, they might be able to improve it.
  21. So, who's going to do that? A Labour party that has a leader and deputy contradicting each other? Has a leader that has U turned on promises made during his leadership campaign? A Labour party with a rift between right of centre and far left? A party that's promised to spend but can't tell where the money will come from? Or maybe the 15 seat Libdems.
  22. No. What is the answer to the question?
  23. $15000 a month? The OP asked for ways to help this guy. I doubt anyone could/would help to that tune.
×
×
  • Create New...