youreavinalaff

Anyone can hide behind the use of the internet and pretend to know it all. Others have better things to do.

Look back at your posts. It was not clear what you meant. You are still not clear. You talk about accredited schools then you say not Thai schools. There are hundreds of Thai accredited schools. Then you talk about licenced and unlicenced teachers. Generally there is no rule about salaries and, yes, in my 20 years of experience, all teachers in the same schools get the same salary. I believe you should have started your first post as " teachers in accredited international schools.........", but then you would have been off topic as the thread is about tests and licencing from techers' council of Thailand and, thus, about Thai schools governed by OBEC. Here is your first post. You have not indicated type, level or nationality of school: "Parent's are paying big money for their children's education, they want to know that the teachers have been appropriately trained. Now, I do understand your frustration, and agree that hands on experience is better. However, by requiring all teachers be licensed and have the paperwork to show it means that the school is able to evidence to parents that all of their teaching staff have had a similar level of training and education."

You started with "parents pay". I pointed out many don't. You then said "only accredited schools". I pointed out your assumptions were incorrect. You now say " I don't mean Thai schools", on a forum "Teaching in Thailand". Now you say " licenced teachers are paid more than unlicenced teachers:. Again, as a generalisation, incorrect.

Don't call me "Dude". I'm not a dude. You've moved the goalposts on your comments so many times I doubt you know yourself what you are trying to say.

I doubt many voters vote entirely because of manifesto. There are a lot of other reasons people vote the way they do.

Correct. Whatever party one votes for in the next election, everyone knows, or should know, that Rishi Sunak is PM.

I wouldn't use breadcrumbs. The yeast in them can react with other ingredients I make my own rusks. Just flour and water, mix together and bake. Then grind.

Who? Friends and family? They are very happy for me. People I don't know? Couldn't care less. Everyone in UK? They don't all know me.

If you believe he knows everyone who lives in UK, it could be. Highly unlikely though.

Some Joe and Jane expats appear to have a low, imaginary, opinion on ALL the British public, yet hate it when they themselves are all tarred with the same brush.

I guess you don't realise you are arguing with someone who knows exactly how the system works. You should give up on this one.

I agree. We are discussing food in Thailand.

It comes from a butcher in Thailand, as do the majority of the meat products on the list.

Can you read? Items shipped from UK may have increased due to GBP AND shipping costs. I believe the bacon does not come from UK. Therefore, in reply to your question " What's that got to do with bacon" answer is "Nothing". If you wish to order i think you should. If you don't, go back to sit under your bridge and have a sleep.

It's nice to be on a thread where experience counts without the usual " do you have a link to that?". ???????????? In my experience, Manstons and Prime are as near to a "British Banger" you are going to get, unless you make your own. We are on the Isaan thread so NookiesDelights or BuriramPieMan would be the best places to contact. Making your own is not difficult but you need to chose a good time of day because of the heat. I had a sausage stuffer, to speed up the process and I bought collagen skins from Makro. I would mix the filling, leave in the fridge overnight and stuff the sausages early in the morning before the hot weather arrived. That was for making over 10kgs of sausage. For lesser amounts, not so much planning needed.

I agree. 17 post newbie. New account, old poster.

You don't understand, do you? Every six weeks there is a delivery date to that town. A meet up. You order in advance and then meet. For the first delivery you wouldn't know the exact date. You'd need to contact Nookie first. You could be lucky and be making an order the week before he's due. For subsequent deliveries you have the goodies you'd ordered your first time to keep you going. You keep a record of the next delivery date and order, up to you exactly, but I would say a couple of weeks before the delivery date. If you are in so much of a hurry you could go to his place and pick up your order.

For the final time. You agreed. I pointed out what was avoided in the article. You have agreed by, twice, saying you can't see it either. No error on my part. If it is an error, you are also wrong.

I made a point about the article. You agreed. Now, you'd never agree with made up stuff, would you?

You really can't see you are proving my point, can you? Looks like you've twisted and turned so much you've disappeared up your own a#@........

Sure. Have a read. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/sep/22/we-lost-about-100000-one-year-on-britons-count-cost-of-the-mini-budget

This is an open forum. No need to inform you of anything. Although you'd like to think is necessary.

Another rib tickler. It's your comment, not mine. ????????????

Careful. You're sliding right. Love to start the day with a laugh. Thanks.

So they've lost £100k. My parents were selling their bungalow at the time too. They reduced by 10% as that was what estate agents and the market suggested. 100k as 10% of a property puts the value of the property at £1m. Not a great loss to take. Especially as they seem to have done it to pay for something you, Chomper, don't believe their Dad is entitled to because he has wealth. Had the headline read " wealthy family sell house for £900k to pay for Dad's care" you'd not have given it time of day. As for the guy losing £100k from his pension pot in 5 days. That again points to a huge pension pot, working on the %%% equivalent of mine. It's very surprising the Guardian are reporting on these people and you are linking to it. Oh, hang on a minute. It's not, is it. Only the losses of 10% are mentioned, made to look substantial by using monetary figures, not the value of the remaining 90%.