Renewals for those already here or for those that aren't?
As I've explained, it will be very difficult for the government to deport the spouse of a British national who already has settlement status.
I agree with your second paragraph.
The report about what is retrospective and what isn't is vague. I think for the reason in your second paragraph.
I'm sure it will be very difficult to deport a spouse of a British citizen.
It's vague.
I'm not suggesting you are wrong. I just think the wording is unclear.
Is it renewals for those not here yet?
There are family rights rules that affect those already here.
Time will tell.
I've read it differently.
It's retrospective to those who are yet to enter UK. There is also a quote from a top immigration lawyer suggesting the same.
My wife will be eligible for ILR December 2024. I believe the income requirement will remain £18600. I belive the fact she is on a " 5 year route" will count.
The articles in the media on this clearly quote " British citizens or those with settled status looking to bring their family members to UK"
There has also been a quote saying " not retrospective".
A very confusing article and nothing more than scaremongering from a newspaper not living up to its name.
They even have a quote saying " not retrospective".
There are laws protecting families that need to be taken into consideration.
Two fundamental differences.
For a work visa the amount earned must be contracted and constant for the duration of the visa. For a spouse visa only 6 months salary needs to be proved.
When applying for FLR based on being a spouse, joint salaries can be used.
I've had absolutely no problems taking my wife into bars, pubs or other social places in UK.
I have never heard anyone give the reason for voting leave as "the coloureds"
I'm sure there are a small minority out there that don't like " coloureds" but it's not as widespread as you like to make out.
You are suggesting racism. Not liking immigration from EU is not being racist.It's certainly not a reason why most people voted leave.
I don't recall mentioning illegal immigration. In fact, I made a point of saying those "being legally in Britain".
No alter egos. Just saying things how they are.
Good, attempted wriggle by you though.
You are quite correct. I haven't.
I know a few that have. Usually because of foolishness, naivety or the feeling of superiority.
Posters on forums tend not to post happy stories. They tend to just live their happy lives. I like to occasionally give a shout out from the other side.
If you don't know or understand the difference between EU migrants and non EU migrants and the benefits to them of being legally in Britain, you should not be commenting on this thread
This thread is with about LGBTQ communities.
Your comment it not.
My comment, which you quoted, was in response to a comment about the LGBTQ communities.
Your comment was not.
Inane to the thread is what your comment was.
"Indian" food served and sold in UK is as British as it is Indian. Mostly created for the Raj to eat.
Balti and Tikka Masala were both created in UK for the British palate.
Go to India and try real Indian food. They you'll understand.
I have not destroyed anything. I am not a gay advocate.
I simply choose not to discriminate against people who are different due to physical or mental conditions that are beyond their control.
There are many ways gay couples can become parents. It happens often.
You say it's a punishment. That would suggest all gay couples want children.
How about hetrosexual couples that cant have kids because of physical issues? Are they being punished?
There is no proof that homosexuality gets passed down generations.