connda

Most of my acquaintances will no longer go to the UK for two reasons. First, it's turned into a an over-priced, third-world s***hole, and second, the government has made Orwell's 1984 into a template for law enforcement. The Trump Administration should sanction every leader, MP, and bureaucrat in the UK who supports the Online Safety Act which should be rebranded as the Online Censorship and Sanctions Act. And for God's sake, don't stop in the street and dare to silently pray. Or hold up a sign against genocide. Being anti-genocide is now equated to an act of terrorism - because? Well, these people just label anything they wish to ban as an act of terrorism, that way they can just completely do away with due process and jury trials. Which of course is the exact type of thing the Soviets were doing decades back, and now the UK and other EU nations seems to have embraced while insisting they are a "Liberal Democracy."

Virtually every major cities are covered with CCTV cameras. No country whatsoever has the moral high-ground regarding surveillance of their citizens. They all do it.

Merry Christmas - Peace on Earth and Goodwill Toward Men

You'd be surprised. Honestly. Every EU, UK, and Commonwealth "leader" promoting the censorship of their citizens as well as citizens world-wide, especially Americans, should be heavily sanctioned by the Trump Administration until they submit and guarantee that freedom of speech and expression is a human right which shall not be infringed by their Neo-totalitarian governments who jokingly refer to themselves as "Liberal Democracies." Not anymore they aren't.

I'm thinking the one on the left is the actual terrorist. The one on the right is a 20 something year old curmuggeon sitting peacefully and holding a piece of paper with Wrong-ThinkTM printed on it.

Suckers and marks are born every day.

Merry Christmas and Peace on Earth and Goodwill Toward Men

Merry Christmas and Peace On Earth & Goodwill Toward Men

Merry Christmas and Peace & Goodwill Toward Men

You really despise Muslims, don't you? Merry Christmas, Inshallah.

In another couple of years he'll be the leader of Venezuela and will be visiting Trump through the backdoor of the WH like Al-Jolani. <laughs>

Let see if I have this right. "American is going to show the European censorship industrial complex a thing or two if they dare censor American voices by making sure they never set foot on American soil and voice their opinions! And if they do make it to American, by God we'll shut them up in the name of the First Amendment! Grrrr!"

Do you still live in your parent's basement. I mean, I actually had a family life during the time when I was a working adult. Out of the house when I was 18, raising a family by the time I was 25. I wasn't a work recluse who shunned his coworkers and planned my trips to Thailand or elsewhere in the third-world so I could get laid. You're an interesting character. I wouldn't want to be in your shoes. You sound sad and lonely.

Sly and The Family Stone had it right. Different strokes for different folks.

Except for the radicals shooting civilians on the beaches of Gaza.

His wife (in fact, just about anyone) would kick his butt.

I'm sure before the decade is out, that power-hungry leaders in the UK and EU will ban snow for being white. "Everyone knows that snow is 'racist.'" Really - these people have turned insane with their power.

Labor Considers To Bill Ban Christmas Songs Critics have raised concerns that the UK's newly passed Employment Rights Bill could indirectly restrict singing certain Christmas songs in workplaces or pubs due to historical controversies over their lyrics or origins. Conservative commentators suggest the bill's third-party harassment protections might lead employers in hospitality venues to censor festive tunes to avoid legal risks. However, the government has firmly dismissed these claims as unfounded. The Employment Rights Bill, enacted in December 2025, strengthens worker protections by requiring employers to take reasonable steps to prevent harassment by customers or third parties related to protected characteristics such as race, religion, or sexual orientation. Opponents, including the Free Speech Union, argue this could create a "banter ban," potentially affecting pub atmospheres where patrons sing along to holiday classics. Songs highlighted in the debate include: Jingle Bells, linked by some historians to 19th-century blackface minstrel performances. Baby It's Cold Outside, criticized in the #MeToo era for perceived consent issues. Fairytale of New York, noted for a past homophobic slur in its lyrics. Do They Know It's Christmas?, accused of perpetuating stereotypes about Africa. Conservative figures have amplified these fears, warning of overreach into everyday social interactions. A government spokesperson countered: "This is complete rubbish. The Employment Rights Act will not affect anyone's right to lawful free speech, and people will still be able to enjoy their favourite Christmas carols." The bill primarily focuses on core reforms like banning exploitative zero-hour contracts and enhancing sick pay rights, with no explicit provisions targeting music or celebrations. Key Takeaways The Employment Rights Bill enhances workplace protections but does not directly ban Christmas songs or carols. Concerns stem from interpretations of third-party harassment rules, not official policy intent. Government officials have explicitly rejected suggestions of restrictions on festive singing or free speech. Original source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15405401/Labour-ban-Christmas-songs-Employment-Bill-racist-origins.html

Islam isn't the problem. Radicalization of anything IS the problem. Radical Islam Radical Jewdism Radical Christiandom Radical Buddhist Radical Atheism Radical <enter a political stance> Radical nationalism Radical ethnocentrism Radical sexulaity Take the "Radical" away, and any of those thing are generally benign, including Islam.

Article came out on Dec 19th in the Telegraph. It's still pertinent. If the mainstream media thinks it is newsworthy, so do I. And honestly - it IS cult behavior as sad as it may be.

The sad state of affairs of those suffering from "forever masking" psychopathy.

Zero Covid Advocates Still Masking in 2025 While most people have returned to pre-pandemic routines, a dedicated group of Covid-cautious individuals continues to prioritize strict coronavirus precautions, including perpetual masking and social isolation to avoid long Covid risks. In 2025, years after global restrictions ended, "zero Covid" advocates remain committed to minimizing SARS-CoV-2 transmission. These individuals, often active in online communities, view ongoing infections as a serious threat leading to long Covid, disability, or sudden health issues. Many wear high-filtration N95 or N99 respirators indoors, avoid restaurants and crowded spaces, and rely on virtual connections. Alyson Hardwick, a 34-year-old student from Toronto, exemplifies this lifestyle. After a friend's death attributed to Covid in 2022, she adopted rigorous precautions, posting videos urging others to mask and improve air quality. She reports losing in-person friendships and family ties due to differing views but maintains that denial of Covid risks is the true fear response. Hardwick predicts non-maskers face early death or disability from repeated infections. The movement, prominent in North America and Europe, includes influencers like journalist Taylor Lorenz, who equates not masking with facilitating harm during an ongoing pandemic. Online forums like Reddit's ZeroCovidCommunity attract thousands, sharing hopelessness over societal normalization of Covid spread. Roots trace to 2020-2021 uncertainties, amplified by vaccine limitations against infection and emerging long Covid cases. As restrictions lifted in 2022, cautious individuals formed tighter networks advocating clean air initiatives. High-profile advocates, including podcasters and activists affected by long Covid, reinforce the message, though some have faced personal tragedies. Critics see this as extreme, but proponents frame precautions as responsible, comparing masking to seatbelts. With Covid still circulating, these zealots argue vigilance protects vulnerable populations and prevents broader health impacts. Key Takeaways A minority of Covid-cautious people continue strict measures like perpetual masking to prevent long Covid and transmission in 2025. Online communities and influencers drive the zero Covid movement, often leading to social isolation from differing risk perceptions. Advocates emphasize airborne transmission risks, viewing societal relaxation as denial amid ongoing infections. Original source: The Telegraph (archived version) https://web.archive.org/web/20251219194444/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/12/19/long-covid-coronavirus-extremists/

Bling

Just file a return. And don't forget to file a FBAR with the US Treasury for any Thai bank accounts you have.

What's Christmas? 🙄