-
Posts
7,361 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by BigStar
-
What is Trump really trying to tell us in his latest speech?
BigStar replied to uncletiger's topic in Political Soapbox
Merely that he has a sense of humor and knows Johnson does too. You probably know that, however. Just another excuse for the usual tiresome Trump trolling we've all heard a thousand times. Yawn. accept that there's actually nothing there but liberal conspiracy theories, and so then SHOCK! look in front of the curtains for yourselves for the real action rather than letting fake news tell you about it. The answer is found right in front of the curtain, not behind where you're shrewdly searching: Speaker Mike Johnson reveals Trump's 'little secret' ahead of Election Day after Dems panic But, yes, a Hollywood move about how Trump got out the vote for common sense and won the presidency, both Houses, AND the popular vote despite the fake news, leftist social media, gaslighting, leftist academics, DNC, corrupt political lawfare and prosecutions, censorship, constant barrage of lies, dire predictions, and name-calling, rewriting of history, pandering vote-buying, divisive racial and gender politics, assassination attempts, a $1 billion campaign chest buying Beyoncé, Oprah, and Bruce Springsteen. Not to mention the barrage of lies and predictions parroted here on the forum by our educated, highly intelligent, and morally superior "elites" who made fools of themselves. I see some of them have resurfaced to enjoy more Trump bashing and confirm their elite status yet again. 🙂 An objective Hollywood director can possibly be found, not one of the usual communists. Maybe the guy who did the Reagan movie. Should be a better script, since the players are still around to be interviewed. -
Go read it for yourself or ask your mama to do so for you. No spoon feeding. You started off mentioning "right wing" with no examples. WOT? But I didn't say The Guardian is left wing. Do you reading of the post you responding to, DUH. In fact I said specifically, The Guardian isn't exactly far left, so far as I know.
-
Got that hard news for libs. Right leaning are, which leftists also call right wing as part of the fearmongering. The Wall Street Journal is mentioned in your linked reference. I doubt you know which way all the others lean. The Guardian isn't exactly far left, so far as I know. Far left "newspapers" like The Morning Star or The News Line also have poor circulation and even depend on donations to stay alive. I suspect The Guardian feels that the negative readers' responses and the fact checking in Community Notes, now that X has free speech, did more harm than good by exposing their "news" as leftist nonsense. Such exposure by alternative right-leaning media, including mainstream FOX, is responsible for the misfortunes of CNN and MSNBC, now laying off staff, including, supposedly, some of the higher profile contributors.
-
Pot, kettle.
-
Ukraine first.
-
Known for hyperbole and occasionally misstating something. If we exclude narcissists from politics and taking all the abuse that comes with it, then we'd have no governments. But if you liked the narcissist, then you'd have absolutely no problem, so it isn't per se the issue. Biden even lied about his son's death. Leftist media continually lies about Trump. And he's not "convicted," or a felon. That's merely a DNC talking point for the yokels, widely repeated here. People elected Trump to carry out the policies in the Republican Party platform, and he seems to be positioning himself to do just that against powerful entrenched interests. So if he succeeds, then you might think it was smart of those who support the policies to have elected him. If you don't like the policies, then it is of course the righteous duty of any self-respecting forum poster to call "stupid" (and worse) those who do--and demonize the man implementing them, no matter how well he succeeds. Dogs need their fleas.
-
But they voted for Biden and Harris, so they're aligned. No weaseling and excuses.
-
Great appointment. Clean up the corruption, curtail the obesity epidemic, etc.
-
True. Many of our miseducated members indoctrinated in socialism in their nanny states suck up that sh*t and then, since boring old farts no one wants to listen to, come here to parrot back, rant, hate, assert imagined superiority and posture as "elites." 🤣
-
Who had to "authorize" them? How do you know no records were kept?
-
No. A common saying is that your sexiest organ is your brain. Most obviously, that's why watching porno, and specific activities, works better than not watching it during the same "mechanical" activity. The thoughts and emotions become ever more important with age as physical abilities decline for all the usual reasons. Teenagers don't need many--a good thing, as they don't have many anyway. We all wish we could be teenagers again knowing what we know now.
-
You wish, but he was just reading from teleprompters what his handlers told him to read, and even that had obviously become difficult. Had he resigned earlier, Harris would have faced a primary, as Pelosi herself implied recently. Then she wouldn't have been the Dem candidate. That would have been different, but then the Dems still didn't have anyone that compelling and wouldn't have been willing to change any of their failed policies--and therefore have lost to Trump anyway.
-
Never passed an audit, LOL. Seems those responsible for that debacle are at last going to meet justice.
-
Wrong. They didn't call for that until AFTER the debate. In private, they knew he was senile, but they were hiding it in hopes of getting him elected. In 2020, after all, he did well just staying in his basement, and all he had to do was read a teleprompter. Harris was claiming Biden had always been fine even after the debate, merely one proof of her basic dishonesty.
-
The OP takes an early lead with #1. Next.
-
Wrong again. As you were informed, that trope refers to Dems hiding Biden's mental decline until they had no choice but to recognize it publicly after it became undeniable in the debate. That tope was and still is valid. You missed the new trope, because you don't know anything. The new trope is that the "democracy loving" DNC and Dems then engineered a coup to install Harris w/o any primary, stealing the Biden campaign money, and so ensuring a weak DEI candidate already once rejected by voters would be put up to fail.
-
The title suggests no such thing. But it was of course clearly the case they were in public. If not for the debate, Biden would have been the candidate.
-
Let the same old tired denigration of both by leftist keyboard warriors begin.
-
Hegseth’s critics who sneer that he is unqualified because he is a Fox News host are the same people who insisted that Joe Biden was compos mentis, Harris was competent and her running mate Tim “Stolen Valor” Walz, who shirked combat and then lied about it, was some sort of military hero. --Dems’ attacks on the intelligent, articulate, and patriotic Pete Hegseth show why they lost – a salute to Trump’s defense secretary pick
-
They lowered standards because higher quality recruits are now less interested in enlisting. Your impression of the fans is the usual nonsense. Hegseth served, talks quite a lot to members of the military, takes a special interest in it, and is an expert on current conditions, while you merely fantasize, demonize, and self-aggrandize at your keyboard.
-
I think they will, 'cause he'll get rid of the wuss influence return the military to the kind of bad*ss force that real men respect and want to be part of. Now they can't get new recruits for obvious reasons. The cool thing will be when she finds out who were the idiots responsible for that little political harassment and fires them. Hee.