Jump to content








U.S. will not issue some visas in four nations in deportation crackdown


webfact

Recommended Posts

U.S. will not issue some visas in four nations in deportation crackdown

By Arshad Mohammed and Yeganeh Torbati

 

tag-reuters-2.jpg

FILE PHOTO: International passengers arrive at Washington Dulles International Airport after the U.S. Supreme Court granted parts of the Trump administration's emergency request to put its travel ban into effect later in the week pending further judicial review, in Dulles, Virginia, U.S., June 26, 2017. REUTERS/James Lawler Duggan/Files

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. State Department on Wednesday will stop issuing certain kinds of visas to some citizens of Cambodia, Eritrea, Guinea and Sierra Leone because the nations are not taking back their citizens the United States wants to deport.

 

The new policies, laid out in State Department cables reviewed by Reuters on Tuesday and described in a department news briefing, are the latest example of U.S. President Donald Trump's effort to crack down on immigrants who are in the United States illegally.

 

The cables, sent by Secretary of State Rex Tillerson to consular officials around the world, said the four countries were "denying or unreasonably delaying" the return of their citizens, and that visa restrictions would be lifted in a country if it accepted its deportees.

 

"The Secretary determines the categories of applicants subject to the visa restrictions, and the categories differ slightly country by country," State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert said in the news briefing on Tuesday.

 

The visa sanctions vary in severity, with Eritrea facing the harshest ones. Any Eritreans who apply in their own country for most U.S. business or tourist visas will be rejected, according to one of the cables.

(http://bit.ly/2jnTWo8)

 

In Guinea, the United States will no longer issue a range of tourist, business and student visas to government officials and their immediate family members who apply from inside the country, another cable said. (http://bit.ly/2y5zMSS)

 

"We are all surprised by the American authorities' decision but the foreign minister is at this moment working so that the situation returns to normal," Guinea government spokesman Damantang Albert Camara told Reuters.

"It must be understood that Guinea has never wanted to prevent the repatriation of its nationals who are in conflict with American law."

 

In Cambodia, the sanction is tailored. Only Foreign Ministry employees at or above the rank of director general, and their families, who apply inside the country will be barred from getting some visas for personal travel, a third cable said. (http://bit.ly/2y5AEHh)

 

For Sierra Leone, only Foreign Ministry and immigration officials will be denied tourist and business visas at the U.S. Embassy in Freetown, according to a fourth cable. (http://bit.ly/2wptf3v)

 

"American citizens have been harmed because foreign governments refuse to take back their citizens," Thomas Homan, acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said in a Department of Homeland Security statement.

 

SOME EXCEPTIONS

 

In each case, there are exceptions for citizens of the four nations who apply for visas from outside their countries, as well as exceptions on humanitarian grounds or for travel "deemed in the interest of the United States."

 

The new rules, which go into effect on Wednesday, do not affect visas that already have been granted.

 

Visa sanctions are allowed by U.S. immigration law to punish countries that refuse to accept their citizens back from the United States. In practice, the United States has rarely taken that step - just twice in the past decade and a half, according to a Department of Homeland Security spokesman.

 

The most recent instance was in October 2016 when the Obama administration stopped issuing visas to Gambian government officials and their families because the government was not taking back U.S. deportees from Gambia. 

 

Three of the four countries included in the current visa restrictions - Cambodia, Guinea, and Eritrea - were on a July list of nations deemed "recalcitrant" by U.S. immigration authorities. It was unclear immediately why Sierra Leone was included in Tuesday's action even though it was not on the "recalcitrant" list in July.

 

ICE has had to release roughly 2,137 Guineans and 831 Sierra Leone nationals, many with "serious criminal convictions," the DHS statement said. In addition, around 700 Eritreans and more than 1,900 Cambodians are living in the United States who have been ordered removed, DHS said.

 

DHS officials say in some cases, the agency has had no choice but to release convicted criminals who served prison time but could not be returned to their home country because it refused to take them back.

 

The Trump administration has made it a priority to pressure reluctant countries to take back their citizens. As of July, the 12 nations deemed "recalcitrant" were China, Cuba, Vietnam, Laos, Iran, Cambodia, Burma, Morocco, Hong Kong, South Sudan, Guinea and Eritrea.

 

According to 2016 congressional testimony by Michele Bond, former assistant secretary of state for consular affairs, Cuba was the "most recalcitrant country on repatriation of its nationals," although she did not give numbers.

 

Other countries then at the top of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) list of recalcitrant countries were China, Somalia and India, Bond said at the time. None of those countries are facing visa sanctions.

 

(Reporting By Arshad Mohammed and Yeganeh Torbati; Additional reporting by David Shepardson in Washington and Saliou Samb in Conakry, Guinea; Editing by Bill Trott and Richard Chang)

 
reuters_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Reuters 2017-09-14
Link to comment
Share on other sites


37 minutes ago, webfact said:

In Cambodia, the sanction is tailored. Only Foreign Ministry employees at or above the rank of director general, and their families, who apply inside the country will be barred from getting some visas for personal travel, a third cable said. (http://bit.ly/2y5AEHh)

 

33 minutes ago, inThailand said:

Finally, a sensible and effective policy. Why not include more countries?

 

Sensible...why tailor it to only foreign ministry employees at or above the rank of director.....political correctness at its absurd best.......

 

 

Another show for the ticket holders...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, inThailand said:

Finally, a sensible and effective policy. Why not include more countries?

If sensible, why does it only apply to third world countries (except Somalia) and not violators China and India? 

Edited by kamahele
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These type of restrictions are because the countries create won't take back citizens who are being deported.   Some countries will take them back, but not if they are forced to return.  

 

I suspect that the Cambodian Foreign Ministry people are targeted because they may well be the ones preventing deportation.    Although, we may have members who are more in the loop on the situation with Cambodia than I am.

 

There were a fair number of Cambodian youth who were deported as gang members in the past.   I suspect that there are more awaiting deportation and the Cambodians may not want to take them back.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, hawker9000 said:

Infant, cub scout, novice, wannabe, apprentice, boy,,,,, take your pick.   Or is this the usual wingnut race card you're lamely attempting to play?

 

Or is this the usual dodge you're attempting?

Boy:

Interesting word of choice for a black man...

:coffee1:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, iReason said:

 

Or is this the usual dodge you're attempting?

Boy:

Interesting word of choice for a black man...

:coffee1:

 

52 cards in the deck, and yours has nothing but race cards in it. 

 

Your delusions and obsessions are showing; time to get back on those meds!  :passifier:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, inThailand said:

Finally, a sensible and effective policy. Why not include more countries?

That's what I thought, and I was trying to figure out how they could come up with "a sensible and effective policy"

 

then i noted obama used it as well... etc... so it's pre existing and proven to influence foreign governments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, kamahele said:

If sensible, why does it only apply to third world countries (except Somalia) and not violators China and India? 

A hint - Chinese tourists visiting USA recently estimated to contribute US$26 billion p.a. to the economy. India currently has 130,000 fee paying students in the US

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...