I actually agree with you on one point: we should criticize politicians when they deserve it, regardless of party. The difference is that I don't see much balance in your posts. Nearly every action Trump takes is automatically interpreted in the worst possible light, while similar actions by other administrations are either ignored or given the benefit of the doubt. For example, the Reflecting Pool has had maintenance problems for decades. Multiple administrations spent millions trying to fix leaks, algae and water-quality issues. If this latest renovation wasn't handled well, then criticize the execution. That's fair. But presenting it as if Trump created the problem or that everything he touches is corruption isn't an objective analysis. You say independent thinkers criticize everyone. I agree. That standard should apply equally. I can point to things Trump has done that I don't like. Can you point to anything he's done that you think was actually a good decision? When every single issue, policy and project is framed as evidence that Trump is corrupt, incompetent or mentally unfit, it starts looking less like independent analysis and more like a conclusion searching for supporting evidence. Let's debate the merits of individual policies than assume one person is wrong 100% of the time. No president Republican or Democrat is right all the time and none are wrong all the time either.
Create an account or sign in to comment