kbelyeu Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 I'm loving it... so many liberal loons here preaching how good and pure Hillary is.. all I can say is choke on it! Kurt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NumbNut Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 4 hours ago, hawker9000 said: ROFLMAO. Wingnuts just loathe turnabout and the shoe being on the other foot. No worries - the major media might have to just barely mention it, but won't give it any meaningful coverage. Once more, dem hypocrisy on parade despite imminent futile efforts to suppress it. And now we're all going to be treated here on TVF to a laundry list of rationalizations for this being altogether "different". hahahahaha Huh? Hey, look over there! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigt3365 Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 19 hours ago, riclag said: American's that voted for change. Finally we have a voice You had a choice for years. Just never exercised it. And now, you've made the wrong choice. Duped by the lies of a con man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riclag Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 19 minutes ago, craigt3365 said: You had a choice for years. Just never exercised it. And now, you've made the wrong choice. Duped by the lies of a con man. What choice was that,the establishment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigt3365 Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 Just now, riclag said: What choice was that,the establishment? Independent. If you voted Republican or Democrat, you voted for the establishment. I went independent decades ago. I saw the light. LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riclag Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 (edited) 5 hours ago, hawker9000 said: ROFLMAO. Wingnuts just loathe turnabout and the shoe being on the other foot. No worries - the major media might have to just barely mention it, but won't give it any meaningful coverage. Once more, dem hypocrisy on parade despite imminent futile efforts to suppress it. And now we're all going to be treated here on TVF to a laundry list of rationalizations for this being altogether "different". hahahahaha There is no denying that! This is huge. Collution .But not as huge as Nov 8 Edited October 26, 2017 by riclag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riclag Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 (edited) "America's national security was sold out and compromised" by selling Uranium to Putin. Edited October 26, 2017 by riclag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigt3365 Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 6 minutes ago, riclag said: "America's national security was sold out and compromised" by selling Uranium to Putin. America's national security was sold out and compromised by a POTUS who's lied to us about his business dealings with Russia and who's tried to stop the investigations into election meddling. Along with calling it fake news. Horrible thing to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smutcakes Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 This topic must be one of Craig3365's worst nightmares! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigt3365 Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 2 minutes ago, smutcakes said: This topic must be one of Craig3365's worst nightmares! Why? I don't like the Clintons. If something illegal was done, they should get to the bottom of it. Sadly, this is just partisan politics at it's worst. Trying to deflect attention away from Trump and his Russia problems. http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/24/politics/obama-era-uranium-deal/index.html It's an extremely complex case. It will be hard to prove anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riclag Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 They lifted the gag order on the key witness in the Urainium One Deal. This goes beyond Clinton. " FBI agents told the informant that President Barack Obama was being briefed on the probe, and that's why the informant was so stunned when the Uranium One deal was approved in 2010". http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/24/politics/obama-era-uranium-deal/index.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smutcakes Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 1 minute ago, craigt3365 said: Why? I don't like the Clintons. If something illegal was done, they should get to the bottom of it. Sadly, this is just partisan politics at it's worst. Trying to deflect attention away from Trump and his Russia problems. http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/24/politics/obama-era-uranium-deal/index.html It's an extremely complex case. It will be hard to prove anything. Funny how it is now partisan politics and deflection, but anything about Trump is 100% FACT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lannarebirth Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 4 hours ago, craigt3365 said: Why? I don't like the Clintons. If something illegal was done, they should get to the bottom of it. Sadly, this is just partisan politics at it's worst. Trying to deflect attention away from Trump and his Russia problems. http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/24/politics/obama-era-uranium-deal/index.html It's an extremely complex case. It will be hard to prove anything. I think it will be easier to prove than you think. OTOH it will be almost impossible to prosecute. The issue isn't how awful Trump or Clinton are. The issue is how awful the American people have become. Just look at these threads. There is no despicaple thing partisans will not defend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amvet Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 8 hours ago, craigt3365 said: Why? I don't like the Clintons. If something illegal was done, they should get to the bottom of it. Sadly, this is just partisan politics at it's worst. Trying to deflect attention away from Trump and his Russia problems. http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/24/politics/obama-era-uranium-deal/index.html It's an extremely complex case. It will be hard to prove anything. And at some point, Democrats will have to decide whether it’s wrong for a political campaign to work with foreigners when obtaining opposition research or whether it’s acceptable. We can’t have different standards for Democrats and Republicans. Otherwise people might start to get the idea that all the histrionics over the past year weren’t really about Russian interference at all, but rather about Hillary losing an election that they assumed she’d win. http://nypost.com/2017/10/25/why-doesnt-hillarys-dossier-trick-count-as-treason/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilostmypassword Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 51 minutes ago, amvet said: And at some point, Democrats will have to decide whether it’s wrong for a political campaign to work with foreigners when obtaining opposition research or whether it’s acceptable. We can’t have different standards for Democrats and Republicans. Otherwise people might start to get the idea that all the histrionics over the past year weren’t really about Russian interference at all, but rather about Hillary losing an election that they assumed she’d win. http://nypost.com/2017/10/25/why-doesnt-hillarys-dossier-trick-count-as-treason/ No, it's not a question of working with foreigners. It's a question of working with foreign governments. That's the crucial difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amvet Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 12 minutes ago, ilostmypassword said: No, it's not a question of working with foreigners. It's a question of working with foreign governments. That's the crucial difference. Payments by a campaign or party committee to an opposition research firm are legal, as long as those payments are reported as such. Clinton's/DNC said the payments were for ‘legal services’ that is not legal. Steele got the information from Russians. Government connected or not who knows? What would the American electorate have said about it if that was known before the election? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riclag Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 3 minutes ago, amvet said: Payments by a campaign or party committee to an opposition research firm are legal, as long as those payments are reported as such. Clinton's/DNC said the payments were for ‘legal services’ that is not legal. Steele got the information from Russians. Government connected or not who knows? What would the American electorate have said about it if that was known before the election? Bernie would of been able to succeed HC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riclag Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 (edited) Recuse,Recuse and Recuse--Mueller and Rosenstein and add special counsel ,to be fair. Edited October 26, 2017 by riclag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 Posts removed. This thread is not about Trump. Stay on topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 Post reported and removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alocacoc Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 Lock her up. It's about time. Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigt3365 Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 56 minutes ago, alocacoc said: Lock her up. It's about time. Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk Keep the cell next to her open for Trump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
binjalin Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 On 10/25/2017 at 12:29 PM, boomerangutang said: D-I-V-E-R-S-I-O-N What will Republicans do next? ....perhaps they'll find that Hillary and a friend once snuck into a neighbor's back yard one night in 1971, and went swimming. ooooooh, that should be salacious! Did the girls wear bathing suits, or go nude? Wow, that will get Republicans foaming at the mouth. Well... actually... they discovered that Hillary paid for the report on Russia how about that then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amvet Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 9 hours ago, binjalin said: Well... actually... they discovered that Hillary paid for the report on Russia how about that then? They will get the bank records of the law firm that did the report and find that the FBI was conned into believing and funding the salacious report and that will be the end of the FBI harassment of Trump and the Trump/Russian investigation will end in ignominy. But don't believe me. Read about it yourselves and do a collective TV weep and moan. www.wsj.com/articles/the-coming-russia-bombshells-1509059214 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
habanero Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 On 10/25/2017 at 12:00 PM, boomerangutang said: Similar to Trump's statement, when asked (during one of last year's debates) whether Obama should name a nominee, according to presidential duties outlined in the Constitution, ....for a vacant Supreme Court Seat, and Trump said, "DELAY, DELAY, DELAY"..... He could now say 'DIVERT, DIVERT, DIVERT' ....when it comes to the important work being done by Mueller's team. Well, Trump COULD say that, if he had a milligram of decency. I believe Mueller will remove himself from any further investigation. Due to conflict of interest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skywalker69 Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 On 2017-10-25 at 5:47 AM, riclag said: The real Russian Collusion . Smoking gun(Urainium One = Quid Pro Quo =source(FBI Informant). All of this during the Obama Era. Can You imagine if it was Trump's Admin ! https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/clinton-campaign-dnc-helped-pay-for-work-on-dossier-about-russia-and-trump/ http://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/2017/10/23/clinton-uranium-one-deal-fbi-informant-blocked-by-obama-era-ag-can-unlock-key-info-attorney-says.html Fox News' Shepard Smith debunks Uranium One lie peddled by his own network https://www.mediamatters.org/video/2017/11/14/fox-news-shepard-smith-debunks-uranium-one-lie-peddled-his-own-network/218557 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FritsSikkink Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 Like Trump and his cronies, they should investigate her too. Doesn't matter from what party they are from, if it stinks have a look into it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigt3365 Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 17 minutes ago, FritsSikkink said: Like Trump and his cronies, they should investigate her too. Doesn't matter from what party they are from, if it stinks have a look into it. As Jeff Sessions has stated, there's no legal basis to go after Hillary and the dems for this. It's just political if they decide to do so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FritsSikkink Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 4 hours ago, craigt3365 said: As Jeff Sessions has stated, there's no legal basis to go after Hillary and the dems for this. It's just political if they decide to do so. Sessions has been lying a couple of times already , so why should I believe him now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andaman Al Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 How funny! I thought with many of the threads there was a distinct lack of all the Trump supporters, and I just peeked in here and they are all in here en masse. At least we know where to find them now. Why does anyone with more than two brain cells and an ability to read still think that HRC was involved in the decision to sell the Uranium? It is truly pathetic. The only reason Trump has called for this is because Sean Hannity started it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now