Jump to content

House Republicans launch probes of Clinton emails decision, uranium deal


webfact

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

4 hours ago, hawker9000 said:

ROFLMAO.   Wingnuts just loathe turnabout and the shoe being on the other foot.  No worries - the major media might have to just barely mention it, but won't give it any meaningful coverage.   Once more, dem hypocrisy on parade despite imminent futile efforts to suppress it.  And now we're all going to be treated here on TVF to a laundry list of rationalizations for this being altogether "different".   hahahahaha

 

 

Huh?

 

Hey, look over there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, craigt3365 said:

You had a choice for years.  Just never exercised it.  And now, you've made the wrong choice.  Duped by the lies of a con man.

What choice was that,the establishment?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, hawker9000 said:

ROFLMAO.   Wingnuts just loathe turnabout and the shoe being on the other foot.  No worries - the major media might have to just barely mention it, but won't give it any meaningful coverage.   Once more, dem hypocrisy on parade despite imminent futile efforts to suppress it.  And now we're all going to be treated here on TVF to a laundry list of rationalizations for this being altogether "different".   hahahahaha

 

 

 There is no denying that! This is huge. Collution .But not as huge as Nov 8

Edited by riclag
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, riclag said:

"America's national security was sold out and compromised" by selling Uranium to Putin.

America's national security was sold out and compromised by a POTUS who's lied to us about his business dealings with Russia and who's tried to stop the investigations into election meddling. Along with calling it fake news.  Horrible thing to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, smutcakes said:

This topic must be one of Craig3365's worst nightmares!

Why?  I don't like the Clintons.  If something illegal was done, they should get to the bottom of it.  Sadly, this is just partisan politics at it's worst.  Trying to deflect attention away from Trump and his Russia problems.

 

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/24/politics/obama-era-uranium-deal/index.html

 

It's an extremely complex case.  It will be hard to prove anything.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They lifted the gag order on the key witness in the Urainium One Deal.

This goes beyond Clinton.

" FBI agents told the informant that President Barack Obama was being briefed on the probe, and that's why the informant was so stunned when the Uranium One deal was approved in 2010". 

 

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/24/politics/obama-era-uranium-deal/index.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, craigt3365 said:

Why?  I don't like the Clintons.  If something illegal was done, they should get to the bottom of it.  Sadly, this is just partisan politics at it's worst.  Trying to deflect attention away from Trump and his Russia problems.

 

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/24/politics/obama-era-uranium-deal/index.html

 

It's an extremely complex case.  It will be hard to prove anything.

 

Funny how it is now partisan politics and deflection, but anything about Trump is 100% FACT!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, craigt3365 said:

Why?  I don't like the Clintons.  If something illegal was done, they should get to the bottom of it.  Sadly, this is just partisan politics at it's worst.  Trying to deflect attention away from Trump and his Russia problems.

 

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/24/politics/obama-era-uranium-deal/index.html

 

It's an extremely complex case.  It will be hard to prove anything.

 

I think it will be easier to prove than you think. OTOH it will be almost impossible to prosecute.  The issue isn't how awful Trump or Clinton are. The issue is how awful the American people have become. Just look at these threads. There is no despicaple thing partisans will not defend.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, craigt3365 said:

Why?  I don't like the Clintons.  If something illegal was done, they should get to the bottom of it.  Sadly, this is just partisan politics at it's worst.  Trying to deflect attention away from Trump and his Russia problems.

 

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/24/politics/obama-era-uranium-deal/index.html

 

It's an extremely complex case.  It will be hard to prove anything.

 

And at some point, Democrats will have to decide whether it’s wrong for a political campaign to work with foreigners when obtaining opposition research or whether it’s acceptable. We can’t have different standards for Democrats and Republicans.

Otherwise people might start to get the idea that all the histrionics over the past year weren’t really about Russian interference at all, but rather about Hillary losing an election that they assumed she’d win.

 

http://nypost.com/2017/10/25/why-doesnt-hillarys-dossier-trick-count-as-treason/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, amvet said:

And at some point, Democrats will have to decide whether it’s wrong for a political campaign to work with foreigners when obtaining opposition research or whether it’s acceptable. We can’t have different standards for Democrats and Republicans.

Otherwise people might start to get the idea that all the histrionics over the past year weren’t really about Russian interference at all, but rather about Hillary losing an election that they assumed she’d win.

 

http://nypost.com/2017/10/25/why-doesnt-hillarys-dossier-trick-count-as-treason/

No, it's not a question of working with foreigners. It's a question of working with foreign governments. That's the crucial difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ilostmypassword said:

No, it's not a question of working with foreigners. It's a question of working with foreign governments. That's the crucial difference.

Payments by a campaign or party committee to an opposition research firm are legal, as long as those payments are reported as such. Clinton's/DNC said the payments were for ‘legal services’ that is not legal.  Steele got the information from Russians.  Government connected or not who knows?  What would the American electorate have said about it if that was known before the election?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, amvet said:

Payments by a campaign or party committee to an opposition research firm are legal, as long as those payments are reported as such. Clinton's/DNC said the payments were for ‘legal services’ that is not legal.  Steele got the information from Russians.  Government connected or not who knows?  What would the American electorate have said about it if that was known before the election?

Bernie would of been able to succeed HC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/25/2017 at 12:29 PM, boomerangutang said:

D-I-V-E-R-S-I-O-N

 

What will Republicans do next?  ....perhaps they'll find that Hillary and a friend once snuck into a neighbor's back yard one night in 1971, and went swimming.  ooooooh, that should be salacious!  Did the girls wear bathing suits, or go nude?   Wow, that will get Republicans foaming at the mouth.

 

Well... actually... they discovered that Hillary paid for the report on Russia

 

how about that then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, binjalin said:

Well... actually... they discovered that Hillary paid for the report on Russia

 

how about that then?

They will get the bank records of the law firm that did the report and find that the FBI was conned into believing and funding the salacious report and that will be the end of the FBI harassment of Trump and the Trump/Russian investigation will end in ignominy.  But don't believe me.

Read about it yourselves and do a collective TV weep and moan.   www.wsj.com/articles/the-coming-russia-bombshells-1509059214

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/25/2017 at 12:00 PM, boomerangutang said:

Similar to Trump's statement, when asked (during one of last year's debates) whether Obama should name a nominee, according to presidential duties outlined in the Constitution, ....for a vacant Supreme Court Seat, and Trump said, "DELAY, DELAY, DELAY".....

 

He could now say 'DIVERT, DIVERT, DIVERT' ....when it comes to the important work being done by Mueller's team.  Well, Trump COULD say that, if he had a milligram of decency.

I believe Mueller will remove himself from any further investigation. Due to conflict of interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 2017-10-25 at 5:47 AM, riclag said:

The real  Russian Collusion . Smoking gun(Urainium One = Quid Pro Quo =source(FBI Informant). All of this during the Obama Era. Can You imagine if it was Trump's Admin !

https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/clinton-campaign-dnc-helped-pay-for-work-on-dossier-about-russia-and-trump/

 

http://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/2017/10/23/clinton-uranium-one-deal-fbi-informant-blocked-by-obama-era-ag-can-unlock-key-info-attorney-says.html

Fox News' Shepard Smith debunks Uranium One lie peddled by his own network

 

https://www.mediamatters.org/video/2017/11/14/fox-news-shepard-smith-debunks-uranium-one-lie-peddled-his-own-network/218557

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, FritsSikkink said:

Like Trump and his cronies, they should investigate her too. Doesn't matter from what party they are from, if it stinks have a look into it.

As Jeff Sessions has stated, there's no legal basis to go after Hillary and the dems for this.  It's just political if they decide to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How funny! I thought with many of the threads there was a distinct lack of all the Trump supporters, and I just peeked in here and they are all in here en masse. At least we know where to find them now.

 

Why does anyone with more than two brain cells and an ability to read still think that HRC was involved in the decision to sell the Uranium? It is truly pathetic. The only reason Trump has called for this is because Sean Hannity started it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...