Why is the MAGA movement so susceptible to crazy conspiracy theories?

[webfact]

U.S., Britain, France accused of snubbing anti-nuclear Nobel Prize

By Alister Doyle

 

FILE PHOTO: Beatrice Fihn, Executive Director of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), who was awarded the 2017 Nobel Peace Prize, talks with reporters during the conference "Perspectives for a World Free from Nuclear Weapons and for Integral Disarmament" at the Vatican November 10, 2017. REUTERS/Tony Gentile

 

OSLO (Reuters) - The anti-nuclear group which won the 2017 Nobel Peace Prize accused the United States, Britain and France on Wednesday of snubbing its disarmament work by planning to send only second-rank diplomats to the award ceremony next month.

 

"It's some kind of protest against the Nobel Peace Prize," Beatrice Fihn, director of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), told Reuters of a plan by the three nations to send only deputy chiefs of mission.

 

"They like their nuclear weapons very much and don't like it when we try to ban them," she said, accusing the three of wrongly opposing ICAN's work "when North Korea and the United States are exchanging threats to use nuclear weapons".

 

The annual December 10 Nobel prize ceremony in Oslo, attended by King Harald and Queen Sonja, is the highlight of the diplomatic calendar in Norway. The prize comprises a diploma, a gold medal and a cheque for $1.1 million.

 

Olav Njoelstad, director of the Norwegian Nobel Institute, confirmed the three nations would send only deputies. He said the awards committee always preferred to see chiefs of mission.

 

"That being said, we are neither surprised nor offended by the fact that sometime foreign governments prefer to stay away from the ceremony in protest or, as in this case, because they prefer to be represented by their deputy chiefs of mission," he told Reuters.

 

"The Nobel Peace Prize is, after all, a political prize. The Norwegian Nobel Committee takes notice of the joint decision of the British, French and U.S. embassies," he said.

 

The British embassy confirmed it was sending a deputy ambassador and said in a statement "the UK is committed to the long-term goal of a world without nuclear weapons.

 

"We share this goal with our partners across the international community including U.S. and France."

 

The U.S. and French embassies were not immediately available for comment. Last month, U.S. President Donald Trump nominated Kenneth Braithwaite to the post of ambassador in Oslo, currently held by an acting ambassador.

 

ICAN, a coalition of grassroots non-government organisations in more than 100 nations, campaigned successfully for a U.N. Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, which was adopted by 122 nations in July this year.

 

But the agreement is not signed by - and would not apply to - any of the states that already have nuclear arms, which include the United States, Russia, China, Britain and France, as well as India, Pakistan and North Korea.

 

Israel neither confirms nor denies the widespread assumption that it controls the Middle East’s only nuclear arsenal.

 

It was not clear whether other nuclear powers would send Oslo ambassadors to the Nobel ceremony.

 

The absence of ambassadors from the United States, Britain and France "is disappointing but at the same time we are focused on getting a majority of states in the world to join this treaty," Fihn said.

 

She said the three nuclear states were exerting pressure on other nations "not to engage in this treaty".

 

(Reporting By Alister Doyle; editng by Ralph Boulton)

 

-- © Copyright Reuters 2017-11-30

[Samui Bodoh]

3 minutes ago, webfact said:

The Nobel Peace Prize is, after all, a political prize.

 

Sorry Nobel committee; when you gave the prize to Al Gore for a movie and to Barrack Obama for not being George Bush, you became a partisan organization. The Nobel committee needs to shake off that partisan image before the winners are again accorded the respect they deserve.

 

I like the Nobel Peace prize, and especially like winners such as Malala Yousafzai. I hope one day the Nobel Peace prize regains its international credibility.

 

[craigt3365]

I'm guessing the presidents of Russia, China, and Pakistan will be there?  LOL

[Credo]

7 minutes ago, craigt3365 said:

I'm guessing the presidents of Russia, China, and Pakistan will be there?  LOL

No, but Kim Jong Un will no doubt be there!

[baboon]

At least they aren't being hypocritical and pretending to be right behind the prize winners. After all, nuclear disarmament is for other countries, not them...

[klauskunkel]

If the buffet is good they will send the top guys. Just prepare a nice spread.

[craigt3365]

1 hour ago, baboon said:

At least they aren't being hypocritical and pretending to be right behind the prize winners. After all, nuclear disarmament is for other countries, not them...

Seems to be true for Russia.

https://www.theatlantic.com/news/archive/2016/10/russia-cold-war-plutonium/502652/

 

The Russian Retreat From a Post-Cold War Nuclear Deal

 

President Vladimir Putin pulled out of an agreement to dispose of plutonium that could be used in 17,000 nuclear weapons.

[baboon]

2 minutes ago, craigt3365 said:

Seems to be true for Russia.

https://www.theatlantic.com/news/archive/2016/10/russia-cold-war-plutonium/502652/

 

The Russian Retreat From a Post-Cold War Nuclear Deal

 

President Vladimir Putin pulled out of an agreement to dispose of plutonium that could be used in 17,000 nuclear weapons.

It is true for all of them.

[craigt3365]

25 minutes ago, baboon said:

It is true for all of them.

So the US pulled out of the agreement? Really?

 

I'm 100% for no nuclear weapons. Perhaps if Russia didn't back out they'd still be in the process of being reduced?

[baboon]

Just now, craigt3365 said:

So the US pulled out of the agreement? Really?

 

I'm 100% for no nuclear weapons. Perhaps if Russia didn't back out they'd still be in the process of being reduced?

It is true for all of them.

[Srikcir]

11 hours ago, webfact said:

accused the United States, Britain and France on Wednesday of snubbing its disarmament work by planning to send only second-rank diplomats

That's not true for the US. It's just that Secretary Tillerson has so undercut Department of State staffing to comply with Trump's budgets cut that it was either sending a second-rank diplomat or the janitor.