Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Prayut promises to consider NACC members’ controversy

Featured Replies

Prayut promises to consider NACC members’ controversy

By The Nation

 

ded8cdc0640c5f12ac9f782c676cef3a.jpeg

General Prayut Chan-o-cha

 

PRIME MINISTER General Prayut Chan-o-cha yesterday said the ongoing controversy over the qualifications of anti-graft commissioners was a critical issue that he would consider when it is referred to him.

 

The National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) bill, recently endorsed by the National Legislative Assembly (NLA), allows all current NACC commissioners to remain in office, although some of them appeared to be disqualified under the charter. Prayut said he would consider the issue when the bill is submitted to him, but at the moment the NLA itself was still considering whether to petition the Constitutional Court to rule on the matter. 

 

“It has not reached me yet as it is in the NLA’s process. They can proceed with the case,” said Prayut. 

 

Somchai Sawangkan, the NLA whip secretary, said some NLA members had started gathering signatures to petition the court.

 

At least 55 members voted against the bill or abstained from voting on the issue, which was more than enough to petition the court, as it requires at least 25 NLA members to support the petition, Somchai said. 

 

Chaturon Chaisang, a key figure in Pheu Thai Party, has warned the ruling junta of a “total collapse” if the NACC members are allowed to continue working.

 

He suggested on Monday that the bill should be amended to reflect the relevant constitutional clauses involving the qualifications of NACC members. Meanwhile, chief charter drafter Meechai Ruchupan said yesterday that the Constitutional Court should be asked to make a ruling regarding some members of the NACC who allegedly should be disqualified under the new charter.

 

Meechai said the Constitution Drafting Commission was concerned about the issue, taking the view that waiving prohibitions on qualifications for the NACC was equivalent to waiving the Constitution, he said. 

 

If the court did not rule on the issue, issues are likely to arise in the future if people who are charged by the NACC challenge the commissioners’ qualifications, Meechai said. 

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/politics/30336428

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2018-01-17

Actually why do they care to keep the current members? They can easily appoint other puppets to replace the current ones.

Wow! New personal record. Now I even stop reading after the first two words.

3 hours ago, candide said:

Actually why do they care to keep the current members? They can easily appoint other puppets to replace the current ones.

If it was that easy don't you think they would have done so already. Now in the other news you see him bring back failed ministers as advisers.  Maybe he needs their support or something of the like. Its a sham anyway.

So what the argument is basically about whether there was any form of corruption involved in the appointment of the anti-corruption council. The boss of which just happens to be investigating his ex-boss, who gave him the anti-corruption job in the first place. No, I don't see any problem here :saai:

7 hours ago, webfact said:

"Prayut said he would consider the issue when the bill is submitted to him"

WOW, the prime-minister-general announcing he will only  "consider" the issue says it all.  He didn't say he would address, rectify, or correct this problem of having unqualified unsuitable unfit possibly corrupt members in his NACC, the crown jewel of his junta government structure.  Hmmm... wasn't/isn't anti-corruption the raison d'être for the 2014 coup and current military government in the first place?    

2 hours ago, Katipo said:

So what the argument is basically about whether there was any form of corruption involved in the appointment of the anti-corruption council. The boss of which just happens to be investigating his ex-boss, who gave him the anti-corruption job in the first place. No, I don't see any problem here :saai:

all crooks just different menus 

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.