How much has Trump?

[webfact]

Bannon will not testify before U.S. House intel panel on Wednesday

 

FILE PHOTO: Former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon speaks during a campaign event for Republican candidate for U.S. Senate Judge Roy Moore in Fairhope, Alabama, U.S., December 5, 2017. REUTERS/Jonathan Bachman/File Photo

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Former White House strategist Steve Bannon's return to the U.S. House Intelligence Committee will not take place on Wednesday as expected, Representative Adam Schiff, the panel's top Democrat said on Tuesday.

 

Bannon had been expected to speak to the House of Representatives committee again on Wednesday as part of investigation of allegations that Russia sought to influence the 2016 U.S. election, to follow up on his Jan. 16 appearance, which failed to satisfy some members of the panel.

 

Moscow denies election meddling, and President Donald Trump has denied any collusion between his associates and Russia.

 

A source familiar with the issue said Bannon's appearance was cancelled because the White House and the committee had yet to agree on matters of executive privilege, by which the president can resist congressional requests for information if he deems it in the public interest.

 

Asked for comment, Schiff told Reuters there could have been many reasons. A spokesman for the committee's Republican chairman, Representative Devin Nunes, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

 

Against the wishes of Democrats, the Republican majority on the intelligence committee has been pushing for the release of a classified memo commissioned by Nunes that alleged surveillance abuse by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Justice. The committee voted along party lines to release the memo on Monday, leaving it to Trump to decide.

 

Democrats have criticized the memo as partisan talking points intended to cast doubt on the investigation.

 

The House intelligence panel is one of three congressional committees, along with Department of Justice Special Counsel Robert Mueller, investigating the matter.

 

During his Jan. 16 appearance, Bannon refused to answer questions about his time in Trump's administration or the post-election presidential transition, committee members said.

 

The White House and the House committee have so far not even begun to discuss the executive privilege issue, the source said. Bannon also has not received documents to review from the White House or Trump's presidential transition office, the source said.

 

White House communications director Hope Hicks, who also has been asked to appear before House Intelligence, is dealing with similar executive privilege issues, according to another person familiar with the matter.

 

(Reporting by Karen Freifeld, Mark Hosenball and Patricia Zengerle; Writing by David Alexander and Patricia Zengerle; Editing by James Dalgleish)

 

-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-01-31

[lannarebirth]

Wow! One of the few journalism pieces to appear here that wouldn't embarrass the journalism professor of the writer. Fact filled, limited in opinion, which is indeed a rarity these days.

[Silurian]

1 hour ago, webfact said:

A source familiar with the issue said Bannon's appearance was cancelled because the White House and the committee had yet to agree on matters of executive privilege, by which the president can resist congressional requests for information if he deems it in the public interest.

 

In other words, how much can Bannon not tell because it implicates Donald. Another example of the WH trying to cover up as much as they can. The WH is trying to twist the meaning of executive privilege to whatever they see fit and works to their advantage.

 

[selftaopath]

Yep, under Trump and his lackey congress liars are in charge. 

[KKr]

2 hours ago, lannarebirth said:

Wow! One of the few journalism pieces to appear here that wouldn't embarrass the journalism professor of the writer. Fact filled, limited in opinion, which is indeed a rarity these days.

it is written by someone who went to school to learn the journalists' profession and, see the source, moreover works for a serious news company that can be relied on since it verifies before publishing.

[ALLSEEINGEYE]

Fake news fanatics wouldn't now a fact if it jumped up and but them on their backsides.

 

If you're ignorant and brainwashed enough to refute science why would you believe facts when you are shown them over and over and over again. 

 

Facts are facts whether you like them or not, doesn't make it fake news, just means you are pig headed.

 

 

Edited January 31, 2018 by ALLSEEINGEYE

[William T]

"Facts are chiels that winna ding" , A Scottish saying.