webfact Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 New political parties seek change ‘but limited by junta’s legacy’ By KHANITTHA THEPPAJORN THE NATION New political groups led by the anti-Shinawatra camp and the pro-democracy groups show that young people will bring significant change to politics, but very likely they will be restrained by the junta’s national strategy legacy and the 2017 Constitution, said veteran politician Nikorn Chamnong recently. Meanwhile, Chaiyan Chaiyaporn, a political scientist at Chulalongkorn University, said groups’ interest in joining politics stemmed from the belief that the new Constitution would give them an opportunity and enable free and fair elections. The comments came after the pro-democracy camp led by the young business tycoon Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit and a pro-junta group led by Suthep Thaugsuban signalled they would enter the political arena to advocate their different agendas. Chaiyan said the phenomenon was similar to events in 1992, when political parties were formed to support a military-influenced government. But this did not mean the ruling National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO) held all of the advantages, he said. Nikorn, formerly a member of the National Reform Steering Assembly, said the ongoing pre-registration of prospective new political parties was one of the most interesting moments in politics, bringing significant changes with new potential parties from the pro-democracy and anti-Shinawatra camps. However, politics would remain in a transition period with limitations on political actors after the election, he added. “The political groups of the younger generation who have dreams and desires for change will face impediments because of the national strategy and the reforms supervised by the [junta-appointed] senators,” he said. It would not be easy to formulate new policies, he added. For existing parties, Nikorn said there were fewer issues because they did not have to gather members or raise funds, he said. However, it was impossible to predict future politics, he said. Democrat politician Thavorn Seniam said the large number of groups contesting the election showed that people were becoming more politically active. But only time would tell how much the new parties could actually achieve, said Thavorn, who is also a former leader of the People’s Democratic Reform Committee (PDRC). Answering the concern that smaller parties could be disadvantaged by the election laws, Thavorn said it was too late to make changes and there was no point to focus on it. Parties just had to follow the law, he said. The former MP said he welcomed everyone and hoped they would help push reforms that PDRC protesters had demanded. Meanwhile, Suthep Thaugsuban, also a former leader of the defunct PDRC, distanced himself from directly participating in politics without ruling out the possibility he would join a political party as a member if invited. Also a former Democrat Party politician, Suthep said yesterday he would not take any political positions nor sit on the executive board of any political party. There would not be a PDRC party, he said, as that movement’s mission ended with its last protest in 2014. Other people had the right to form a new party, he said, but they could not claim to be the PDRC. “After we’re done, we return to what we were,” Suthep said. “People go back to their jobs. Politicians go back to their parties. Those from Democrat Party go back to the party.” Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/politics/30340238 -- © Copyright The Nation 2018-03-06 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobBKK Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 "distanced himself from directly participating in politics" and we REALLY believe him 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Thailand Posted March 5, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted March 5, 2018 How many seats are the military already guaranteed to get in any so called "election"? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post gunderhill Posted March 5, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted March 5, 2018 FREE AND FAIR, what a joke, nothing fair about them how about "RIGGED and WRONG", they're all trapped in their stupid hierarchy and too much that cannot be commented on. The only thing going to change Thailand is a MASSIVE upset. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Get Real Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 (edited) They are not supposed to seek or make any changes. That´s a central piece for beeing denied to enter the world of politics. The ones that fall in the line will finally be registered. Edited March 6, 2018 by Get Real 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yellowboat Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 5 hours ago, webfact said: New political groups led by the anti-Shinawatra camp and the pro-democracy groups show that young people will bring significant change to politics, but very likely they will be restrained by the junta’s national strategy legacy and the 2017 Constitution, said veteran politician Nikorn Chamnong recently. As bad as Mr. T was, would he have done what the junta did and is doing ? He readily used SLAPP against his opponents, but the junta has done far more than that. It just seems that democrats and the army can't seem to do anything other than undermine democracy in Thailand. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chainarong Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 Never a truer word said in Jest , Limited by Junta's legacy , the whole of Thailand will be limited................................ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichardColeman Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 5 hours ago, webfact said: said the large number of groups contesting the election showed that people were becoming more politically active. I think the term is 'divide and conquer' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
realenglish1 Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 Suthep Thaugsuban would have been far worse than the current Junta He believed in destroying everything and everyone that did not agree with him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srikcir Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 10 hours ago, webfact said: belief that the new Constitution would give them an opportunity and enable free and fair elections. Did the 2007 Constitution succeed? No. Is the 2017 Constitution any more liberal? No. Will the 2017 Constitution succeed? No. End of beliefs. 10 hours ago, webfact said: But this did not mean the ruling National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO) held all of the advantages If not the NCPO, who then? As it's the NCPO that is writing (through its appointed surrogates) all the laws, rules, regulations and qualifications for elections and the Independent Organizations, appointing the Senate including seats for NCPO members and power to decide the PM and cabinet, what advantage doesn't the NCPO have? It will have constitutional right to invoke absolute power until a new elected government has been "installed." End of fantasies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sawadee1947 Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 10 hours ago, webfact said: but very likely they will be restrained by the junta’s national strategy well, what do you expect????? Fair play????? Fair and free elections (if they come once) Wake up this General would like to stay forever. (as all dictators like to do. Recent efforts in China, established in N.Korea) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatOngo Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 (edited) I'm backing the "Bottomless Trough Party" to beat the "Endless Swill Party" in a close contest to win the next election. I think people have had enough of the "Long Snout Party". Edited March 6, 2018 by PatOngo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobBKK Posted March 7, 2018 Share Posted March 7, 2018 19 hours ago, realenglish1 said: Suthep Thaugsuban would have been far worse than the current Junta He believed in destroying everything and everyone that did not agree with him same same Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now