8 hours ago, katana said:

Analysis of the judge's ruling today:

 

Analysis by a failed Canadian lawyer who is Yaxley-Lennon's employer. 

 

Neither expert nor unbiased! 

10 hours ago, Scott said:

Unless you are willing to provide a source, I will consider it trolling and posting mis-information.   Oh, and you might want to make it a credible source.  

 

 

Is a video a credible source ? but no doubt the lefties will claim it's not Tommy ?? anyway i'm working on it !

29 minutes ago, simple1 said:

Replacing one set of morons, with another is good?

 

555! Is political extremism a continuum or really circular? Go 360 degrees and the two extremes ain't much different. Lunatics replaced my madmen!

9 minutes ago, alfieconn said:

Is a video a credible source ? but no doubt the lefties will claim it's not Tommy ?? anyway i'm working on it !

Why do you have to work on it when you say you've already found it?

 

16 hours ago, alfieconn said:

16 hours ago, bristolboy said:

So give us a link to the alleged video or film.

Find it like i did !

 

3 hours ago, Baerboxer said:

 

Actually the number of members of any religious groups in the UK isn't important. What is important is that they all conform to the laws, customs and expected behavioral norms. Any who can't should leave.

 

Tolerance for people to follow their religion is fine. Any behavior contradictory to law, culture, custom and excepted behavioral norms isn't and should be shown zero tolerance.

 

The mistake of the liberals is to impose an acceptance and demand change from the host communities.

Indeed. I was giving a simplified view. I don't give a stuff about religions 

 

With Muslims I don't care for their customs and social mores. Crucially, their failure to integrate I shall a major issue for me.

 

However, we don't need pogroms or nastiness generally. Just become less welcoming. Ban burkas and halal meat for starters.

1 hour ago, eng911 said:

Tommy has almost 1 million people who follow his facebook group. His words have the potential to disrupt the proceedings. 

As do the BBC's !

3 hours ago, MichaelJay said:

Tommy Robinson was a citizen journalist reporting on Muslim rape gangs. That was his crime. In the UK you cannot say anything about the crimes being committed so as not to offend the Muslim community.

Silly comment. He risked jeopardising the trial. I want these apes to be subject to the full force of the law. We don't do lynch mobs. Do you?

2 hours ago, eng911 said:

Tommy has almost 1 million people who follow his facebook group. His words have the potential to disrupt the proceedings. 

1.5% scum is not unusual. Just scrape it off with a spatula and discard 

26 minutes ago, 7by7 said:

Analysis by a failed Canadian lawyer who is Yaxley-Lennon's employer. 

 

Neither expert nor unbiased! 

Try getting your facts right. Tommy left Rebel Media and went independent last February.

 

This has been a travesty of justice, persecution that has tones of how political opponents were dealt with in Soviet Russia.  Don`t like the competition, then lock em up. And BTW, I have great admiration for Donald Trump, the more I see and hear of those that try to ridicule the now President of the United States, the more I grow to dislike these people. Same applies in the Tommy Robinson case.

 

 

25 minutes ago, alfieconn said:

As do the BBC's !

The BBC reported on the commital proceedings at the magistrate's court last year; before any reporting restrictions were put in place. An old report on a local, not national, news page.

 

Whether the restrictions were not retrospective or whether the BBC neglected to remove that old report, I don't know.

 

Yaxley-Lennon's offence occured well after the reporting restrictions were put in place.

 

Very interesting that Yaxley-Lennon's defence used this old BBC report in his defence when he continuously brands thenm as liars and did so again yesterday!

2 minutes ago, 7by7 said:

The BBC reported on the commital proceedings at the magistrate's court last year; before any reporting restrictions were put in place. An old report on a local, not national, news page.

 

Whether the restrictions were not retrospective or whether the BBC neglected to remove that old report, I don't know.

 

Yaxley-Lennon's offence occured well after the reporting restrictions were put in place.

 

Very interesting that Yaxley-Lennon's defence used this old BBC report in his defence when he continuously brands thenm as liars and did so again yesterday!

It was on the BBC website, (not sure if that is local or National ?) of which Tommy read the names from, that's it finished no need for you to waffle on anymore !

The arguments put forward by Yaxley-Lennon’s supporters make depressing reading.

 

There’s the gross generalization that the crimes of a minute minority of Muslims are somehow a reflection of all Muslims and all of Islam.

 

This is then followed by the idea that Yaxley-Lennon is defending ‘British culture and British values’ the implication being that the crimes Yaxley-Lennon and his followers have themselves identified as ‘Muslim/Islamic’ are not present in wider British society.

 

They then move on to various conspiracy theories and the ludicrous suggestion that ‘Liberals’ and the ‘Left’ (or worse still ‘Liberal Lefties’) are somehow responsible for the crimes of individuals that Yaxley-Lennon have themselves identified as Muslim/Islamic crimes.

 

Finally they wrap this whole mess of convoluted conspiracy theories a huge big ‘chip on the shoulder’.

 

The government, the police, the Liberals, the Left, the Liberal Lefties, the ‘Mainstream Media’, academia, the courts are all conspiring against the ‘free thinkers’ who support the convicted wife beating mortgage fraudster Yaxley-Lennon.

 

Pointing out that Yaxley-Lennon was arrested and imprisoned for contempt of court and putting an ongoing trial at risk of mistrial or worse still an unsafe verdict goes in one ear and out the other.

 

The trial itself is evidence that every claim they make is hogwash - facing up to the risk Yaxley-Lennon presented to the trial requires accepting the justice system is doing its job and that Yaxley-Lennon is nothing more than a two bit rabble rouser.

 

’Citizen Journalist’ - He’s got more right to claim picking his nose as evidence of him being an ENT Surgeon.

15 minutes ago, alfieconn said:

It was on the BBC website, (not sure if that is local or National ?) of which Tommy read the names from, that's it finished no need for you to waffle on anymore !

Still waiting for the link you claimed to already have yesterday.

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The arguments put forward by Yaxley-Lennon’scsupporters make depressing reading.

 

There’s the gross generalization that the crimes of a minute minority of Muslims are somehow a reflection of all Muslims and all of Islam.

 

This is then followed by the idea that Yaxley-Lennon is defending ‘British culture and British values’ the implication being that the crimes Yaxley-Lennon and his followers have themselves identified as ‘Muslim/Islamic’ are not present in wider British society.

 

They then move on to various conspiracy theories and the ludicrous suggestion that ‘Liberals’ and the ‘Left’ (or worse still ‘Liberal Lefties’) are somehow responsible for the crimes of individuals that Yaxley-Lennon have themselves identified as Muslim/Islamic crimes.

 

Finally they wrap this whole mess of convoluted conspiracy theories a huge big ‘chip on the shoulder’.

 

The government, the police, the Liberals, the Left, the Liberal Lefties, the ‘Mainstream Media’, academia, the courts are all conspiring against the ‘free thinkers’ who support the convicted wife beating mortgage fraudster Yaxley-Lennon.

 

Pointing out that Yaxley-Lennon was arrested and imprisoned for contempt of court and putting an ongoing trial at risk of mistrial or worse still an unsafe verdict goes in one ear and out the other.

 

The trial itself is evidence that every claim they make is hogwash - facing up to the risk Yaxley-Lennon presented to the trial requires accepting the justice system is doing its job and that Yaxley-Lennon is nothing more than a two bit rabble rouser.

 

’Citizen Journalist’ - He’s got more right to claim picking his nose as evidence of him being an ENT Surgeon.

In Britain today, people are being jailed for free thinking, especially when it goes against the grain of the establishment, established by those who try to impose on us what we can say, what we can think and what views we are allowed to discuss. Try going on facebook and praising Donald Trump or Tommy Robinson, then see what type of responses you receive. The ploy is working by making not going along with the flow and having opposing views as socially taboo.

 

The summary procedure for Tommy Robinson`s contempt of court presents a number of problems such as inadequate time to properly prepare his case.  It is crucial for the defence that an individual facing committal for contempt is given a proper opportunity to know the detailed allegations and to be able to prepare for the hearing.  The court session in Tommy Robinson's case was held within hours and not given a reasonable time to prepare a defence. This was not a fair trial but more of a legal lynching by the corrupt system.

Just now, cyberfarang said:

In Britain today, people are being jailed for free thinking, especially when it goes against the grain of the establishment, established by those who try to impose on us what we can say, what we can think and what views we are allowed to discuss. Try going on facebook and praising Donald Trump or Tommy Robinson, then see what type of responses you receive. The ploy is working by making not going along with the flow and having opposing views as socially taboo.

 

The summary procedure for Tommy Robinson`s contempt of court presents a number of problems such as inadequate time to properly prepare his case.  It is crucial for the defence that an individual facing committal for contempt is given a proper opportunity to know the detailed allegations and to be able to prepare for the hearing.  The court session in Tommy Robinson's case was held within hours and not given a reasonable time to prepare a defence. This was not a fair trial but more of a legal lynching by the corrupt system.

He didn't have enough time, so he gets a reprieve and new trial there. Anything unfair about that? Seems the justice system is working.

 

And no, people are not jailed for free thinking. Feel free to praise Yaxlee-Lennon or Trump anywhere and nobody will jail you.

Troll post and reply removed

2 minutes ago, stevenl said:

He didn't have enough time, so he gets a reprieve and new trial there. Anything unfair about that? Seems the justice system is working.

 

And no, people are not jailed for free thinking. Feel free to praise Yaxlee-Lennon or Trump anywhere and nobody will jail you.

Wrong again.

 

Tommy Robinson was charged, tried, found guilty and thrown into jail within hours of being arrested. He was not placed in a holding cell or given bail allowing a reasonable time to prepare his case. Nazi war criminals were given fairer trials. This has been an exercise to gag Tommy Robinson and quickly.

21 hours ago, BigBadGeordie said:

Just going to leave this here.

 

 "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"

Evelyn Beatrice Hall 

Then, all you Brits should not complain when the Muslim activists start sprouting their vile BS.

13 minutes ago, cyberfarang said:

In Britain today, people are being jailed for free thinking, especially when it goes against the grain of the establishment, established by those who try to impose on us what we can say, what we can think and what views we are allowed to discuss. Try going on facebook and praising Donald Trump or Tommy Robinson, then see what type of responses you receive. The ploy is working by making not going along with the flow and having opposing views as socially taboo.

 

The summary procedure for Tommy Robinson`s contempt of court presents a number of problems such as inadequate time to properly prepare his case.  It is crucial for the defence that an individual facing committal for contempt is given a proper opportunity to know the detailed allegations and to be able to prepare for the hearing.  The court session in Tommy Robinson's case was held within hours and not given a reasonable time to prepare a defence. This was not a fair trial but more of a legal lynching by the corrupt system.

Like I said, conspiracy theories and a large dose of ‘they’ve got it in for us free thinkers’.

4 minutes ago, cyberfarang said:

Wrong again.

 

Tommy Robinson was charged, tried, found guilty and thrown into jail within hours of being arrested. He was not placed in a holding cell or given bail allowing a reasonable time to prepare his case. Nazi war criminals were given fairer trials. This has been an exercise to gag Tommy Robinson and quickly.

It was a reasonable action to stop Yaxley-Lennon prejudicing an on going trial.

 

As hs been explained to you, his actions could have very easily resulted in a mistrial or worse still an unsafe verdict.

 

An unsafe verdict would have freed the child rapists - That’s what Yaxley-Lennon was risking.

14 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

It was a reasonable action to stop Yaxley-Lennon prejudicing an on going trial.

 

As hs been explained to you, his actions could have very easily resulted in a mistrial or worse still an unsafe verdict.

 

An unsafe verdict would have freed the child rapists - That’s what Yaxley-Lennon was risking.

Out of interest, have any of the Muslim child grooming gangs and rapists pertaining to this case, been sentenced and officially named yet?

 

If so, does anyone have a link for the details?

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The arguments put forward by Yaxley-Lennon’scsupporters make depressing reading.

 

There’s the gross generalization that the crimes of a minute minority of Muslims are somehow a reflection of all Muslims and all of Islam.

 

This is then followed by the idea that Yaxley-Lennon is defending ‘British culture and British values’ the implication being that the crimes Yaxley-Lennon and his followers have themselves identified as ‘Muslim/Islamic’ are not present in wider British society.

 

They then move on to various conspiracy theories and the ludicrous suggestion that ‘Liberals’ and the ‘Left’ (or worse still ‘Liberal Lefties’) are somehow responsible for the crimes of individuals that Yaxley-Lennon have themselves identified as Muslim/Islamic crimes.

 

Finally they wrap this whole mess of convoluted conspiracy theories a huge big ‘chip on the shoulder’.

 

The government, the police, the Liberals, the Left, the Liberal Lefties, the ‘Mainstream Media’, academia, the courts are all conspiring against the ‘free thinkers’ who support the convicted wife beating mortgage fraudster Yaxley-Lennon.

 

Pointing out that Yaxley-Lennon was arrested and imprisoned for contempt of court and putting an ongoing trial at risk of mistrial or worse still an unsafe verdict goes in one ear and out the other.

 

The trial itself is evidence that every claim they make is hogwash - facing up to the risk Yaxley-Lennon presented to the trial requires accepting the justice system is doing its job and that Yaxley-Lennon is nothing more than a two bit rabble rouser.

 

’Citizen Journalist’ - He’s got more right to claim picking his nose as evidence of him being an ENT Surgeon.

People like you don't get it, it's not so much the problem now it's the future that is the worry, how many problems did we have with Muslims in the UK 20 years ago ? negligible, now there are a lot more and they are starting to impose themselves on the country thus we are seeing more problem's,  that's how they work, be it on a street corner (just have a look at Speakers corner how they intimidate people when outnumbering them) or having large number's in a country, slowly they take over, implement Sharia, block out other religion's, have a look at problems around the world, whether it be bomb's going off, country's at war, terrorism, large scale kidnapping's, even problems close to home in Thailand and Myanmar and you can bet that 90% of these incident's there are Muslims involved, coincidence i don't think so !

As for your above post, ok it might be a minority that commit crimes but the problem is that the majority are sympathetic to the minority and believe in the same thing's.

If you think that Islam is a religion of peace then may i suggest that you do some research on the subject.

I dread to think what the UK will be like in 30 years time but lucky for me i don't have any children and gran children in the UK and i hope for your sake that you don't either.

 

  

38 minutes ago, stevenl said:

He didn't have enough time, so he gets a reprieve and new trial there. Anything unfair about that? Seems the justice system is working.

 

And no, people are not jailed for free thinking. Feel free to praise Yaxlee-Lennon or Trump anywhere and nobody will jail you.

No no nothing unfair about that when he has just done 2 month's, what world are some of you people living in ?

38 minutes ago, cyberfarang said:

Wrong again.

 

Tommy Robinson was charged, tried, found guilty and thrown into jail within hours of being arrested. He was not placed in a holding cell or given bail allowing a reasonable time to prepare his case. Nazi war criminals were given fairer trials. This has been an exercise to gag Tommy Robinson and quickly.

Please stop, you're totally incorrect. Unless he didn't appeal and got a retrial?

51 minutes ago, cyberfarang said:

In Britain today, people are being jailed for free thinking

Be interested to read your definition of a "free thinker" as these days it has been often corrupted to be  code for right wing conspiracy theorists / alt right etc. A few links to people in the UK who have been jailed for 'free thinking'' would be helpful

7 minutes ago, alfieconn said:

No no nothing unfair about that when he has just done 2 month's, what world are some of you people living in ?

Ge was convicted of more than one crime, and gets a retrial on one.

 

I believe he will be found guilty, so back to jail.

Just now, stevenl said:

Ge was convicted of more than one crime, and gets a retrial on one.

 

I believe he will be found guilty, so back to jail.

So what crime was he convicted of ?

3 minutes ago, alfieconn said:

So what crime was he convicted of ?

Go look it up. I found it. It was easy.

Why are the details of the court case Robinson is following being kept from us by the authorities ?

7 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

Why are the details of the court case Robinson is following being kept from us by the authorities ?

It may cause discrimination to Muslims, if the story is publisised