Jump to content

Prosecutors press financial fraud case against Trump ex-aide Manafort


webfact

Recommended Posts

Prosecutors press financial fraud case against Trump ex-aide Manafort

By Nathan Layne and Sarah N. Lynch

 

2018-08-02T162338Z_2_LYNXMPEE710RG_RTROPTP_4_USA-TRUMP-RUSSIA-CHARGES.JPG

FILE PHOTO: Former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort is shown in this booking photo in Alexanderia, Virginia, U.S., July 12, 2018. Alexandria Sheriff's Office/Handout via REUTERS

 

ALEXANDRIA, Va. (Reuters) - Prosecutors on Thursday aggressively pressed their bank and tax fraud case against Paul Manafort, presenting testimony and documents to try to prove U.S. President Donald Trump's former campaign chairman deceived his lead bookkeeper and a bank about his finances.

 

On the trial's third day, the prosecution pivoted away from describing Manafort's lavish lifestyle, focusing instead on the nitty-gritty details of actions they believe underpin the charges against him of bank fraud, tax fraud and failing to report foreign bank accounts.

 

Prosecutors have attempted to portray Manafort as a tax cheat and a liar who hid much of the $60 million he earned from political work for pro-Russian politicians in Ukraine by stashing it in undisclosed overseas accounts.

 

Manafort, 69, is facing 18 charges in the first trial stemming from Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation of Russia's role in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Manafort has pleaded not guilty to all the charges in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia, outside Washington.

 

Manafort's lead bookkeeper Heather Washkuhn, who managed the books of his personal and business finances, testified that she thought she had complete knowledge of his financial affairs but that she was unaware of his holdings outside of the United States.

Washkuhn, managing director of the accounting firm Nigro Karlin Segal Feldstein & Bolno, said Manafort was "very detail-oriented" and "approved every penny" the firm paid from his personal account.

 

Prosecutors presented evidence that Manafort emailed a doctored profit-and-loss statement to a Chicago bank from which he was seeking a loan.

 

They showed jurors an email from Washkuhn to the bank showing that, through Nov. 20, 2016, his business had a net loss of $1,116,497. They then displayed another email they said Manafort sent to an executive at the bank with a profit-and-loss statement for September 2016 attached.

 

The document stated that Manafort's consulting firm had a net income of $3,011,952. Washkuhn said she did not produce that document.

 

The email from Manafort could potentially undercut his defense strategy. Since the trial started on Tuesday, his lawyers have sought to lay the blame for any financial irregularities on his business partner Rick Gates and went so far as to accuse him of embezzling money from Manafort's firm.

 

Defense attorney Thomas Zehnle avoided asking about the questionable document when his turn came to cross-examine Washkuhn.

 

Taking long pauses to check his notes in between questions, he pressed Washkuhn on whether Gates was the primary go-to guy for Manafort's financial affairs.

 

"Mr. Gates would deal with DMP items," she replied, referring to Manafort's consulting firm. "But Mr. Manafort was the approval source."

 

Washkuhn also testified that she was in the dark about a laundry list of corporate entities that the government says Manafort used when he wired funds to pay expenses.

 

Vendors who provided goods to the Manafort family testified Wednesday and Thursday that they often received overseas wire transfer payments from companies such as Peranova Holdings Limited, Global Highway Limited and Lucicle Consultants Limited.

 

Washkuhn said she had no idea any of those entities were owned or controlled by Manafort.

 

Mueller has pursued a 14-month investigation of Russia's role in the election and potential coordination between the Trump campaign and Moscow, though none of the charges against Manafort involve that issue.

 

KEY WITNESS TO TESTIFY

Greg Andres, a member of Mueller's team, confirmed on Thursday that the prosecution will call Manafort's former business partner Gates as a witness, a day after prosecutors suggested they might not.

 

"We have every intention of calling him as a witness," Andres said.

 

Gates pleaded guilty to making false statements after being indicted by Mueller, and is cooperating with Mueller's probe.

 

As part of his guilty plea, Gates acknowledged routinely dealing with accountants in the preparation of Manafort's tax returns and misleading them with false information, although he said he did so with Manafort's knowledge.

 

Manafort routed millions of dollars to the United States by putting it in real estate, and spending it on expensive suits, cars and home renovations, according to prosecution witnesses. Prosecutors said Manafort evaded taxes through this scheme. Five of the 18 counts he faces relate to filing false tax returns.

 

On Thursday, the jury heard from Joel Maxwell of a Florida-based company that installs lighting, audio visual equipment and automation systems for homes that did work for Manafort. Maxwell testified that some of the Manafort invoices shown to him from prosecutors appeared to be have been forged.

 

Michael Regolizio, of a landscaping firm in the Hamptons on New York's Long Island, also testified that a Manafort invoice was phony, listing an incorrect address and an altered version of his company's name. Regolizio said he was paid about $450,000 between 2010 and 2014 for work for Manafort, and that the money was paid via a money transfer from Cyprus.

 

It was unclear who created the invoices or how they were used.

 

Mueller has indicted or secured guilty pleas from 32 people and three companies. Trump has called Mueller's investigation a witch hunt and on Tuesday called on Attorney General Jeff Sessions to end it.

 

(Reporting by Nathan Layne and Sarah N. Lynch in Alexandria, Virginia; Additional reporting by Susan Heavey and Karen Freifeld; Writing by Warren Strobel; Editing by Will Dunham and Grant McCool)

 
reuters_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-08-03
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Mueller has indicted or secured guilty pleas from 32 people and three companies. Trump has called Mueller's investigation a witch hunt..."

(In Trump voice) "Who'd a thought there were so many witches? Believe me, unbelievable"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pegman said:

Special council Ken Starr was at it for more than 4 years starting with the Whitewater investigation.  Still early days for Mueller. 

 

More like double that.

 

And there were like half a dozen Benghazi probes, with Hilary testifying under oath for 11 hours.

 

But for some reason, Republicans are now clamoring to "wrap it up". It's almost like they have two sets of rules". Compare/contrast Kagan/(Garland)/Kavanaugh SCOTUS nominations. 

 

 

DdV_MjMWsAEOnKf (1).jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, pegman said:

Special council Ken Starr was at it for more than 4 years starting with the Whitewater investigation.  Still early days for Mueller. 

The average is 3 1/2, and this is a complex investigation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think abunch of you should read about the trial,but not on CNN. Try one of those legal oriented web sites.

 

The Government is having a hard time with the Judge. I can tell you right now without having to be there that the lead AUSA is no match for Manaforts attorneys. 

 

The theme of the case for the defense is the "lying rat" Gates. Watch and learn.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Nyezhov said:

I think abunch of you should read about the trial,but not on CNN. Try one of those legal oriented web sites.

 

The Government is having a hard time with the Judge. I can tell you right now without having to be there that the lead AUSA is no match for Manaforts attorneys. 

 

The theme of the case for the defense is the "lying rat" Gates. Watch and learn.

You are talking rubbish, there is loads of evidence without using Gates. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, FritsSikkink said:

You are talking rubbish, there is loads of evidence without using Gates. 

Really. Well that's not what the judge says,but I guess we all need to defer to your expertise,?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nyezhov said:

Really. Well that's not what the judge says,but I guess we all need to defer to your expertise,?

Well, seems better than your expertise which seems more from TRump fansites.

 

We'll have to wait and see, so far I see no signs of what you're saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"If the Python jacket fits, you must convict."

 

And the corollary...

 

"If the ostrich jacket does not fit, you must acquit."

 

Not sure what to make of Mrs. Manafort's hasty retreat from the courtroom during the accountant's mention of the Cyprus Bank Accounts? 

 

It looks like Gates will testify, that's a bit of a surprise I guess?

 

Obviously, with a jury trial, anything can happen.

 

Might he not be convicted on all the charges/counts? Maybe. Might he get a light sentence? Maybe.

 

 

Please feel free to provide a link to these "legal" sites, but not Russian ones, please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Nyezhov said:

Really. Well that's not what the judge says,but I guess we all need to defer to your expertise,?

Better than to listen to you, claiming he is innocent.

Please do give a link where the judge states that.

Edited by FritsSikkink
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is that the judge, in addition to being a bit old, cranky and crotchety, and wanting to head out for a long weekend recess, is making extra efforts to appear pro-defendant/anti-prosecution so as to not make any mistakes which might appear pro-government, and open the path to an appeal?

 

And the pro-tRUmp "legal eagles" seem to be seizing any random statement the judge makes to create the appearance that their side is winning. Divisive as ever.

 

I'm not sure why Gates needs to testify to prove a Conspiracy as the bookkeeper Heather Washkuhn has stated she was in on the fix, and the Bank President will also prove Conspiracy.

 

Most of us are content to let the government rest and let the jury decide.

 

And I do wish the tRUmp supporters would stop calling him "deranged".

 

And will Manafort have a separate third trial for Witness Tampering? Or will that be rolled up into his second trial?

 

Most people expect he will be indicted after the mid-terms with Russians, DJTJm Jared, Stoney, and various other campaign scum.

 

 

 

 

Edited by mtls2005
Link to comment
Share on other sites

TDS is Trump's Derangement Syndrome, I get that one, or should I say he's got that one.

 

What is TFS? Trump Fatigue Syndrome? Does he tire easily? Dr. Rony please pick up the white courtesy telephone, and put down your prescription pad.

 

What do these syndromes that afflict tRUmp have to do with Paully Man's ostrich jacket?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...