Iran to unveil new fighter jet, develop missiles - minister

[rooster59]

Iran to unveil new fighter jet, develop missiles - minister

 

FILE PHOTO: Iran's national flags are seen on a square in Tehran February 10, 2012. REUTERS/Morteza Nikoubazl

 

DUBAI (Reuters) - Iran will unveil a new fighter jet next week and continue developing missile capabilities as a top priority, the defence minister said on Saturday, defying new U.S. sanctions aimed at curbing Tehran's missile programme and regional influence.

 

Iran's navy also announced on Saturday that it has mounted a locally built advanced defensive weapons system on one of its warships for the first time, as tensions mount with the U.S. military in the Gulf.

 

U.S. President Donald Trump withdrew the United States in May from a 2015 accord between Iran and world powers that curbed Tehran’s nuclear activity in exchange for sanctions relief.

 

Trump said the deal was deeply flawed as it had not curbed Iran’s ballistic missile programme or reined in its support for proxies in conflicts in Syria, Iraq and Yemen.

 

Iran has dismissed any direct talks with Washington to resolve the issues raised by Trump.

 

"Our top priority has been development of our missile programme. We are in a good position in this field, but we need to develop it," Brigadier General Amir Hatami was quoted as saying by Fars news agency on Saturday.

 

"We will present a plane on National Defence Industry Day, and people will see it fly, and the equipment designed for it,” Hatami added. Iran celebrates National Defence Industry Day on Aug. 22.

 

"POSIBLE THREATS"

 

Iran unveiled in 2013 what it said was a new, domestically built fighter jet, called Qaher 313, but some experts expressed doubts about the viability of the aircraft at the time.

 

Iran’s functional air force has been limited to perhaps as few as a few dozen strike aircraft, either Russian or ageing U.S. models acquired before the 1979 Iranian revolution.

 

Iranian Navy Commander Rear Admiral Hossein Khanzadi said on Saturday that "coastal and sea testing of the short range defence Kamand system were concluded successfully, and said this system was mounted ... on a warship and will be mounted on a second ship soon," the semi-official Tasnim news agency reported.

 

Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said earlier this month it held war games in the Gulf aimed at "confronting possible threats" by enemies.

 

The U.S. military’s Central Command said it had seen increased Iranian naval activity, extending to the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic waterway for oil shipments the Revolutionary Guards have threatened to block.

 

Iran has developed a large domestic arms industry in the face of international sanctions and embargoes that have barred it from importing many weapons.

 

 

-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-08-19

[rskdev]

Like the ones they have already.

[billd766]

Good for the Iranians.

 

It is great to a country stand up in the face of a world class blustering bully.

[Grouse]

Thanks Trump

 

Great diplomatic move

 

The real idea behind the nuclear deal was to undermine the warlike mad mullahs: economic progress in exchange for backing away from nuclear weapons. Trump has put the militants back in charge with predictable results.

 

It would have been great to have a powerful ally in the area to balance Iraqi, Saudi, Israeli, Afghan and assorted nutters

[Tchooptip]

It is a great misfortune for humanity that the Shah of Iran was not supported in its time.

[Esso49]

1 hour ago, billd766 said:

Good for the Iranians.

 

It is great to a country stand up in the face of a world class blustering bully.

 

It is great to a country stand up in the face of a world class blustering ,  morally dead,  bully

[bristolboy]

2 hours ago, rskdev said:

Like the ones they have already.

Another poster who doesn't understand that Persians are not Arabs.

[Tchooptip]

12 minutes ago, billd766 said:

 

He came to power in 1941 after an Anglo Soviet invasion toppled his father.  During Mohammad Reza's reign, the Iranian oil industry was briefly nationalised, under Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, until a US and UK-backed coup d'état deposed Mosaddegh and brought back foreign oil firms.

 

Mohammad Reza gradually lost support from the Shi'a clergy of Iran as well as the working class, particularly due to his strong policy of modernisation, laïcité, conflict with the traditional class of merchants known as bazaari, relations with Israel, and corruption issues surrounding himself, his family, and the ruling elite.

 

Several other factors contributed to strong opposition to the Shah amongst certain groups within Iran, the most significant of which were US and UK support for his regime, clashes with Islamists and increased communist activity.

 

There is a lot more here on Wikipedia which may not be 100% correct but certainly not 100% wrong either.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Reza_Pahlavi

 But incredibly interesting, thank you 

[Esso49]

14 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

Another poster who doesn't understand that Persians are not Arabs.

Absolutely true and to call a Persian an Arab is highly insulting to them.   Much like calling a Scotsman English,  even if in the latter's case they hoped they had have been.

[Ulic]

10 hours ago, Tchooptip said:

It is a great misfortune for humanity that the Shah of Iran was not supported in its time.

Here lies the problem. The Shah of Iran was installed by the USA and the UK. Nothing but a puppet.  He was a murderous thieving thug who imprisoned and  murdered 10's of thousands of his own people. That is what led to the Iranian revolution of 79. That is why Iranians hate America. If only they had not interfered politically by installing the murderous dictator the wingnut Mullas would not control Iran now.

[canuckamuck]

2 hours ago, billd766 said:

Good for the Iranians.

 

It is great to a country stand up in the face of a world class blustering bully.

Yes the moral authority of Iran is a shining example of compassion and love for all.

/s

[300sd]

3 hours ago, billd766 said:

Good for the Iranians.

 

It is great to a country stand up in the face of a world class blustering bully.

Yes that's nice.

Would you also want Iran for a neighbor, if you had the choice? I'd choose the US thanks.

[connda]

10 hours ago, rooster59 said:

Iran's navy also announced on Saturday that it has mounted a locally built advanced defensive weapons system on one of its warships for the first time, as tensions mount with the U.S. military in the Gulf.

Hummm, mounting modified S-300 systems on ships?  A2/AD in the Straight of Hormuz.  Should be mildly interesting.  No more civilian airliners getting shot down perhaps.

Edited August 19, 2018 by connda

[BuaBS]

45 minutes ago, 300sd said:

Yes that's nice.

Would you also want Iran for a neighbor, if you had the choice? I'd choose the US thanks.

The US is already everybody's neighbour , listening and watching you through all your electronics , influencing your government and media.

Iran doesn't.

[billd766]

1 hour ago, canuckamuck said:

Yes the moral authority of Iran is a shining example of compassion and love for all.

/s

 

Compared to the moral authority of the USA, then yes it is.

[BestB]

3 hours ago, Grouse said:

Thanks Trump

 

Great diplomatic move

 

The real idea behind the nuclear deal was to undermine the warlike mad mullahs: economic progress in exchange for backing away from nuclear weapons. Trump has put the militants back in charge with predictable results.

 

It would have been great to have a powerful ally in the area to balance Iraqi, Saudi, Israeli, Afghan and assorted nutters

I thought Iraqi , Saudi and Israeli were already allies, turns out you also want Afghan , which half way around the world on the other side 

[billd766]

59 minutes ago, 300sd said:

Yes that's nice.

Would you also want Iran for a neighbor, if you had the choice? I'd choose the US thanks.

 

With the USA under Trump and they way they are heading now, I would choose Iran.

[AsiaHand]

4 hours ago, billd766 said:

Good for the Iranians.

 

It is great to a country stand up in the face of a world class blustering bully.

Your lack of knowledge is overwhelminf. The tv wont let me say ignxxxxce.

[AsiaHand]

4 hours ago, Tchooptip said:

It is a great misfortune for humanity that the Shah of Iran was not supported in its time.

He was supported by his people until the Islam Mullahs took over in his absentee when he was getting chemo for his cancer..I got to shake his hand in 1976.

[AsiaHand]

The last time the Iranians claimed to introduced a new fighter  it was found out to be a non flying mock up.

[BestB]

1 hour ago, billd766 said:

 

With the USA under Trump and they way they are heading now, I would choose Iran.

Have you made travel arrangements yet to make a move over?

[Harveyg]

1 hour ago, BuaBS said:

The US is already everybody's neighbour , listening and watching you through all your electronics , influencing your government and media.

Iran doesn't.

What a country doesn’t do is insufficient to hold it up for admiration.  Thank god it doesn’t have the means.  

So....   look at what it has done and what it threatens to do and let’s just throw in their claim that Israel has no right to exist.  Quite admirable. 

[metisdead]

An inflammatory post and a reply has been removed. 

[Grouse]

1 hour ago, BestB said:

I thought Iraqi , Saudi and Israeli were already allies, turns out you also want Afghan , which half way around the world on the other side 

Iran borders all these countries or effectively 

 

You Americans may wish to snuggle up with Saudi and Israel. I am rather more fussy.

 

Iraq will NEVER be an ally of America.

 

Afganistan will never be allies with anyone unless you count Pakistan. What do you mean by  "half way around the world on the other side"? Are you American?

 

I suggest you buy some atlases, history books and also read up on the "great game"

[Tchooptip]

5 hours ago, canuckamuck said:

Yes the moral authority of Iran is a shining example of compassion and love for all.

/s

1

...compassion and love...

First of all for its own people ?

Edited August 19, 2018 by Tchooptip

[billd766]

2 hours ago, BestB said:

Have you made travel arrangements yet to make a move over?

 

Why?

 

I was merely answering a question given the choice of the USA under Trump or Iran.

 

I live in Thailand with my Thai family.

 

Neither the USA nor Iran is my neighbour.

Edited August 19, 2018 by billd766
added extra text

[ChiangMaiLightning2143]

The US is already everybody's neighbour , listening and watching you through all your electronics , influencing your government and media.
Iran doesn't.

I think Iran just blocks
Your internet completely.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[maximillian]

7 hours ago, Grouse said:

Thanks Trump

 

Great diplomatic move

 

The real idea behind the nuclear deal was to undermine the warlike mad mullahs: economic progress in exchange for backing away from nuclear weapons. Trump has put the militants back in charge with predictable results.

 

It would have been great to have a powerful ally in the area to balance Iraqi, Saudi, Israeli, Afghan and assorted nutters

 

Wow, Mr. Grouse, today I can fully agree with you calling Saudi and Israeli nutters.

[maximillian]

7 hours ago, Tchooptip said:

It is a great misfortune for humanity that the Shah of Iran was not supported in its time.

 

Hah ?  The Shah was very much supported by the West. Most of all by the US and GB.

To mention the Shah and humanity in one sentence is so wrong. You never heard of his unfamous secret police force, the SAVAK ?

He replaced the democratically elected President Mossadegh. (Google: Operation Ajax, CIA, MI6)

Without that coup the mullahs wouldn't be the rulers of Iran today. Bad luck for Iran to be in the possession of oil.

[maximillian]

4 hours ago, AsiaHand said:

Your lack of knowledge is overwhelminf. The tv wont let me say ignxxxxce.

 

Please enlighten us ignorant deplorables with your overwhelming knowledge. Please...