No legal reason for PM to step down as junta head after stating ‘interest in politics’: Wissanu

By The Nation

 

 

General Prayut Chan-o-cha is not required by law to step down as leader of the ruling junta if he is interested in entering politics ahead of the next general election, Deputy Prime Minister Wissanu Krea-ngam said on Tuesday.

 

Wissanu, who is in charge of the government’s legal affairs, was responding to calls from critics for the prime minister to also leave his position as head of the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO) now that he had hinted at a plan to enter politics ahead of the national election.

 

Prayut said on Monday that he was “interested in political work” and hinted at becoming a prime ministerial candidate for a political party that he had yet to identify.

 

“It’s the prime minister’s personal matter. Nothing is strange for someone to be interested in politics. He does not need to resign as the prime minister. And the law does not require General Prayut to resign as the NCPO leader if he wants to enter politics,” Wissanu said at Government House.

 

The deputy PM declined to answer a question on whether he would join a future administration headed by Prayut if approached to do so.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/politics/30355210

 

-- © Copyright The Nation 2018-09-26

Anyone want to campaign against a guy with article 44 in his pocket? Better talk real nice if you do.

He doesn’t have to step down period if he doesn’t feel like it. 

required by law?  What law?  And what would it matter if there was or was not a law?  The man took over in a coup which was not allowed by law.  Laws are only as good as the system that enforces them and that people abide by.

God, the lies these people constantly tell with a straight face. For years (almost) we've heard that Prayut is not allowed to stand directly as a candidate in the election - and now suddenly, magically, with a wave of the all-powerful junta wand, it is perfectly OK.

 

I don't know about you, but I find these CONSTANT insults to our intelligence and this constant abuse of ill-gotten power beyond annoying ...

Legal? This has been a dictatorship from the very start. Since when did they need legal?

Edited September 26, 20187 yr by Lungstib

Change the name of article 44 to suit an unelected new/old pm and back to the same old.

 

3 hours ago, webfact said:

Prayut said on Monday that he was “interested in political work” and hinted at becoming a prime ministerial candidate for a political party that he had yet to identify.

 

I thought the three friends were the best bet to be crawling after him?

 

I've updated a decades-old synopsis:

The Three Stooges Friends were a vaudeville and comedy team. Their hallmark was physical farce intimidation and slapstick.

 

Well of course there's no legal reason for him to step down, after all, there's no legal reason for him being there in the first place.

Edited September 26, 20187 yr by JAG

51 minutes ago, Eligius said:

God, the lies these people constantly tell with a straight face. For years (almost) we've heard that Prayut is not allowed to stand directly as a candidate in the election - and now suddenly, magically, with a wave of the all-powerful junta wand, it is perfectly OK.

 

I don't know about you, but I find these CONSTANT insults to our intelligence and this constant abuse of ill-gotten power beyond annoying ...

But..but..every morning he wakens to a constant chorus of "Stay,oh please stay" and has manfully resisted this siren call for four years.

 

You can see that his honest efforts to stay a democratic soldier in the face of all importunity has worn him down.

 

Have some empathy for the poor man.

How can there be a legal way to remove him when he wasn't legally installed? Junta reasoning?

Since when  has a legality ever influenced him ?

There was no legal reason for a military coup, the law does not come into it

11 hours ago, gk10002000 said:

required by law?  What law?  And what would it matter if there was or was not a law?  The man took over in a coup which was not allowed by law.  Laws are only as good as the system that enforces them and that people abide by.

It must be nice to pick what the laws of the day will be and who will have to follow them! 

 

Are the Thai voters paying attention and understanding all of these smoke and mirror moves? 

https://www.thaipbsworld.com/pm-prayut-loses-his-cool-and-hits-back-at-sanoh-thienthong/

 

An infuriated Prime Minister Gen Prayut Chan-o-cha today hit back at veteran politician Sanoh Thienthong who had earlier cast doubts on the possibility of his return to power after the election.

2 minutes ago, anchadian said:

https://www.thaipbsworld.com/pm-prayut-loses-his-cool-and-hits-back-at-sanoh-thienthong/

 

An infuriated Prime Minister Gen Prayut Chan-o-cha today hit back at veteran politician Sanoh Thienthong who had earlier cast doubts on the possibility of his return to power after the election.

Oops!

Looks like Sanoh is the winner of today's "punch in the face award" as offered by the PM recently.

 

3 hours ago, chama said:

It must be nice to pick what the laws of the day will be and who will have to follow them! 

 

Are the Thai voters paying attention and understanding all of these smoke and mirror moves? 

I think the majority of Thai voters are aware of things, but are almost powerless to change things.  At least I hope they are aware.

13 hours ago, inThailand said:

How can there be a legal way to remove him when he wasn't legally installed? Junta reasoning?

 

Or a hypothetical inquiry might ponder to ask: 

If he loses any such dreamy election, would he still retain title and power of JUNTA BOSS?

 

????????

18 hours ago, webfact said:

Wissanu, who is in charge of the government’s legal affairs,

Legal affairs which in Thailand are not debated just approved by a rubber stamp committee.  His job is just one big charade. 

 

If he did step down, the evil little troll would take over.  Evil troll or Elmer Fudd is not much of a choice.  Both usurpers allow for government to run wild without oversight. 

 

A sense someone crying foul when they loose the fixed election and therefore says they are entitled to stay put until the next election in 2030.