Footage of Australian pedophile raping Thai child so horrific judge delays case

[unamazedloso]

can i get a work permit to take these morons out? Id be happy to do it free of charge but just dont want to be locked up myself. Fact is i seriously would. a few more condo jumps and weird suicides would go unoticed. The world doesnt need these idiots. Brain damage is one thing but surely something could have been done.

[webfact]

Child sex videos so awful judge who jailed paedophile rapist for 19 years says she is battling get them out of her head

 

Queensland child rapist Jason Daron Mizner will spend at least the next 15 years behind bars for sexually abusing a two-year-old girl, as well as filming the assaults.

 

Mizner pleaded guilty to 65 child sex offences including more than 30 counts of rape and videotaping the assaults.

 

The 44-year-old formed a relationship with the girl's mother, before committing the offences over a number of months.

 

Full story: https://www.9news.com.au/2018/10/26/11/32/jason-mizner-jailed-for-19-years

 

-- 9NEWS 2018-10-26

 

 

[zzidenn]

i believe cutting his genitals off should be added to his sentence. and i believe that putting him back in a thai jail is also what he deserves, just for a bit more „torture“. 

[off road pat]

My kind of Judge !!! I have the most RESPECT for !!!!!

Every judge should be like this !!!

Edited October 26, 2018 by off road pat

[Manny]

He should be given the choice of death penalty or castration. If he can't decide then death penalty automatic.

[NanLaew]

7 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

One bullet should do the job. That will also assure that he will never every do it again.

 

I think Queensland ditched firing squads when they ditched Joh Bjelke-Peterson... or maybe even before that.

[OneMoreFarang]

39 minutes ago, TomTao said:

Yes, after a couple of placed cuts to allow the agates to drop out and be exposed, then it's a choice between blow flies or ants.

Personally I think it's enough if he is dead because that will make sure he will never do it again. Would torturing him "help" in any way? I don't think so.

[NanLaew]

6 hours ago, Old Croc said:

...but that the judge is unable to separate emotion from her job.

Didn't you see that Cavanaugh guy? And he was just applying for a judges job!

[OneMoreFarang]

19 minutes ago, Manny said:

He should be given the choice of death penalty or castration. If he can't decide then death penalty automatic.

And would castration make sure he will never torture any kids again? No.

[NanLaew]

2 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

And would castration make sure he will never torture any kids again? No.

It does if you keep the nuts and bin the rest.

[ThaidDown]

5 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

And would castration make sure he will never torture any kids again? No.

Depends upon which bit you kept and which bit you incinerated.

Edit ..  NanLaew...seems we think the same way.

Edited October 26, 2018 by ThaidDown

[changmaichillin]

Lets face it there are many of these types in Thailand and south east Asia, the sex industry really does not help so if you partake in it you might want to question your own behavior. Also write to the politicians in your own country and get convicted paedo's banned from travel for life. Don't complain unless you sre prepared to do something about it.

[TomTao]

Personally I think it's enough if he is dead because that will make sure he will never do it again. Would torturing him "help" in any way? I don't think so.

It would be entertainingly satisfying for people who have victims of twisted animals like this.

Sent from my SM-G960F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

[car720]

7 hours ago, darksidedog said:

Let me make it easy. Give the dirty pedo life and be done with it, to make sure he never gets a chance to do it again.

No.

One of those hot wires that they used to insert in the head of it for people with the clap, 3 times a day for the rest of his life.

[SammyT]

14 minutes ago, changmaichillin said:

Lets face it there are many of these types in Thailand and south east Asia, the sex industry really does not help so if you partake in it you might want to question your own behavior.

 

I don't "partake" in the sex industry but I think you're drawing a long and illogical bow by equating the adult sex industry to the rape of a toddler. There are paedophiles all over the world, what generally draws them to developing countries is perceived lax law enforcement and the fact that they generally wield financial influence which allows them to befriend and groom kids. 

 

Great moral high horse you're riding around on, though

[sead]

7 hours ago, ezzra said:

Like what emotions? its like you woke this morning all new to this horrid case right? in anyway, judges has that penalty scale according to the committed crimes and offences and emotions has no place in the bench..

Must be one of the stupidest comments you made. I have seen videos like that and I can guarantee you that I wanted to throw up myself, and the more you look the more the dizziness and vomit feeling goes away and you just feel that you need to find that guy and rip his heart out....

[SammyT]

3 minutes ago, sead said:

Must be one of the stupidest comments you made. I have seen videos like that and I can guarantee you that I wanted to throw up myself, and the more you look the more the dizziness and vomit feeling goes away and you just feel that you need to find that guy and rip his heart out....

Agreed, and you could guarantee his lawyer (whatever sort of scum chooses to represent someone like that) would have used any emotion shown by the judge to argue for a lighter sentence on appeal. I can't see how it matters that the sentencing was delayed. What's a few days compared to the next 19 years. 

 

Aussie crims have a pretty good record of doing things like throwing scalding water on paedos, here's hoping they stay true to form

[NanLaew]

3 hours ago, HAKAPALITA said:

Defence Lawyers are a weird lot. Would you as a normal person not reach the point where you cant defend the Bastard anymore. They never do. Even take pride in getting the Guilty off.

A good defence lawyer isn't about getting people off at all. They are primarily there to make sure a prosecution follows the letter of the law and not just the spirit. They are necessary to balance the scales of justice. They are there to make sure nothing is missed out, grudges and hunches and personal bias and beliefs aren't involved, that legal procedures are adhered to regardless of what a person is being prosecuted for.

 

Granted that in this particular case, the guilty party has nothing meaningful in his defence; a head injury causing him to become "uninhibited" is as pathetic as it gets. However, both defence and prosecution lawyers are bound by the same code of ethics and to serve the courts and their client. If this defence lawyer had not mounted any defence or any mitigating circumstances, his client could have appealed that he had an improper or inappropriate defence and thus prolong the whole affair at taxpayers expense. 

 

My buddy is a defence lawyer in the US. When he get's a client off, he takes pride in his work as a lawyer. Twice he has represented total evil incarnate and got them off due to prosecutorial misconduct or flawed legal oversight. In those instances, he takes no pride in the fact that the evil is still free. But he takes enormous pride in showing the prosecution how to do their job properly the next time.

[Jonmarleesco]

7 hours ago, Thaiwrath said:

Mizner's lawyers argued his sentence should be reduced 

 

 

Sometimes, I think defence lawyer's ideas should also be questioned.

For what he has pleaded guilty to, there should be nothing other than the absolute maximum sentence given.

To request a reduction, for whatever reason, is beyond belief.

They're his defence lawyers. What would you expect them to do? 

Edited October 26, 2018 by Jonmarleesco

[SammyT]

1 minute ago, NanLaew said:

A good defence lawyer isn't about getting people off at all. They are primarily there to make sure a prosecution follows the letter of the law and not just the spirit. They are necessary to balance the scales of justice. They are there to make sure nothing is missed out, grudges and hunches and personal bias and beliefs aren't involved, that legal procedures are adhered to regardless of what a person is being prosecuted for.

 

Granted that in this particular case, the guilty party has nothing meaningful in his defence; a head injury causing him to become "uninhibited" is as pathetic as it gets. However, both defence and prosecution lawyers are bound by the same code of ethics and to serve the courts and their client. If this defence lawyer had not mounted any defence or any mitigating circumstances, his client could have appealed that he had an improper or inappropriate defence and thus prolong the whole affair at taxpayers expense. 

 

My buddy is a defence lawyer in the US. When he get's a client off, he takes pride in his work as a lawyer. Twice he has represented total evil incarnate and got them off due to prosecutorial misconduct or flawed legal oversight. In those instances, he takes no pride in the fact that the evil is still free. But he takes enormous pride in showing the prosecution how to do their job properly the next time.

Agree in principle that the world needs defence lawyers, but arguing that he should get a lesser sentence because of his treatment in Thai prison for doing the same is a bit of a stretch to say that's good legal work. Picking up flaws in the prosecution case, absolutely though. 

[Jonmarleesco]

6 hours ago, worgeordie said:

Fair sentence!! !, he does not justify a fair sentence,

just lock him up and forget about him.

regards worgeordie

A fair sentence. That could be more, not less. 

[Bluespunk]

1 hour ago, hansnl said:

Of course I don't defend the perp.

But if the perp did already spend 11 years in prison for this, how is it possible he is on trial for the same thing for the second time?

Because he’s filth. 

 

He’s committed many such offences and should never be allowed outside a prison until he expires and makes the world a better place. 

Edited October 26, 2018 by Bluespunk

[SammyT]

1 hour ago, hansnl said:

Of course I don't defend the perp.

But if the perp did already spend 11 years in prison for this, how is it possible he is on trial for the same thing for the second time?

Didn't read the article, huh? 

 

He raped a toddler in Australia. Fled to Thailand, and also raped a child in Thailand. Got caught for raping the child in Thailand, got put in jail. 

 

Got deported to Aussie, got arrested and charged with the one he's currently being sentenced for. 

[observer90210]

Sometimes the death penalty in a Criminal Justice System does make sense....

[connda]

Show the video to voters before a referendum on castrating pedophiles. 

[mrfill]

6 hours ago, toenail said:

He is such a mentally deranged person-  I often wonder why castration isn’t the penalty for any first timer rapist to children ? For the pedophile will only do it again and again. 

A frequent call in these cases, usually by the uninformed. Castrated men CAN get erections so would still be able to repeat offend.

[Happy Grumpy]

9 hours ago, webfact said:

"I think it would be best to put some distance between the viewing of that tape and the delivery of the judgment so that it does not overwhelm the sentence," she

No, no.

 

Let what he did 'overwhelm the sentence'

[xtrnuno41]

8 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

One bullet should do the job. That will also assure that he will never every do it again.

 

Well rather use a rope and hang him. you can use the rope over and over again. 

Bullet will give air pollution and you have to take care of the lead.

According this Chinese advertising, this rope should do well.

[Number 6]

Good old fashioned stoning sounds about right to me.

[NanLaew]

1 hour ago, SammyT said:

Agree in principle that the world needs defence lawyers, but arguing that he should get a lesser sentence because of his treatment in Thai prison for doing the same is a bit of a stretch to say that's good legal work. Picking up flaws in the prosecution case, absolutely though. 

As I said, in this instance there was nothing significant in the way of redeeming or mitigating factors and the alleged 'rough time in a Thai jail' ultimately had the same net worth as the alleged head injury; bugger all. The lawyer has to do his job and if a lawyer hasn't got much to go on, he still has to offer something or risk that challenge that he didn't do anything.