An American man arrested in Spain after allegedly providing material support for Hamas is being held without bail in Madrid as the US government seeks his extradition, prompting fresh concerns among leftwing supporters of Palestinian causes about “chilling effects” on humanitarian and political activity. Get today's headlines by email Spanish authorities detained James “Fergie” Chambers on Friday in Ibiza. He is now in custody in the Spanish capital, where a hearing has been set for Thursday to decide whether he can be released on bail. The indictment against him has been sealed. Spanish extradition processThe Spanish high court has 40 days to rule on the US extradition request submitted by the Trump administration. If the court rejects the bid, the proceedings end at that stage. If it approves the request, the Council of Ministers makes the final decision, according to a spokesperson for the court. Stanley Cohen, an attorney with decades of experience in terrorism cases, said the case is the first known instance of the US pursuing extradition of a citizen who has been arrested and charged in connection with support for Hamas. In comments reported by supporters, Cohen said the decision to seek extradition would “look good” politically, adding that he believed the move was made for “political purposes”. Chambers’s case, he suggested, could influence how other people and groups view the risks of involvement in pro-Palestinian work. Donations and alleged linksChambers, who describes himself as anti-imperialist, is the heir to a wealthy US family that owns Cox Communications. His legal team says he has funded progressive and humanitarian projects, including initiatives supporting children and other community efforts in the Middle East, and that he has donated more than $1m to humanitarian projects in Gaza. His attorney, Llorenç Salvà, said in a statement that Chambers has long been known to US authorities and that the Trump administration, which has prioritised disrupting alleged terrorist-related funding, is now seeking his extradition. In statements about the arrest, Chambers’s partner, Stella Schnabel, said he was being jailed for using his wealth to support Palestine, characterising it as political persecution. Chambers also said he had been on the US federal government’s radar for more than a decade. According to the account of his activities, he sold stock in mid-2023 worth around $250m as part of transactions within his family’s holdings, and later directed money towards causes he supported. The case drew attention in the United States after Chambers was profiled in US media. In late 2023, he gave an interview on local television in New Hampshire about a direct action against Elbit Systems, described as an Israel defence contractor, which he said was carried out by a group that he had backed financially. He later moved to Tunisia, where he bought the football club Club Africain. Leftwing concerns and legal precedentsSpanish politicians and lawmakers from left-of-centre parties have questioned whether the state is treating humanitarian or solidarity work as criminal support for terrorism. Irene Montero, a member of Podemos and a Spanish representative in the European Parliament, posted on X on Monday that Spain should not collaborate with the Trump administration in what she described as the persecution of Palestinian solidarity, arguing the government should protect Chambers. Separately, six members of Spain’s Congress from Sumar wrote that Chambers’s arrest occurred in the context of “growing repression” from the Trump administration against the Palestinian solidarity movement. They also pointed to Spain’s wider public critiques of Israel’s actions in Gaza and said that heightened tensions with the Trump administration form part of the background to the US request. Trevor Aaronson, author of books on the FBI and terrorism, linked the Chambers case to arguments made within Trump-era counter-terrorism thinking that leftwing groups can be treated as part of a broader network connected to violence. He said the approach echoes legal reasoning developed in the post-9/11 “War on Terrorism”, including the mid-2000s Holy Land Foundation case, where prosecutors argued that money can be “fungible” and that support for governed areas could indirectly aid groups such as Hamas. Aaronson said that such reasoning can create a “chilling effect”, discouraging people from donating to Palestinian groups or other leftwing organisations for fear their actions could be interpreted as terrorism-related support. He also criticised the timing, saying that humanitarian needs in Gaza are greater than ever and that linking aid to terrorism is significant. Join the discussion? 15 July 2026
View full article
Create an account or sign in to comment