Jump to content

British lawmakers defy May to reject no-deal Brexit, to vote on three-month delay


webfact

Recommended Posts

British lawmakers defy May to reject no-deal Brexit, to vote on three-month delay

By William James, Kylie MacLellan and Elizabeth Piper

 

2019-03-13T140708Z_1_LYNXMPEF2C1D7_RTROPTP_4_BRITAIN-EU.JPG

British Prime Minister Theresa May speaks in Parliament in London, Britain, March 13, 2019, in this screen grab taken from video. Reuters TV via REUTERS

 

LONDON (Reuters) - British lawmakers on Wednesday rejected leaving the European Union without a deal in any scenario, paving the way for a vote to seek to delay Brexit until at least the end of June.

 

After a day of high drama, lawmakers voted by 321 to 278 in favour of a motion that ruled out a potentially disorderly 'no-deal' Brexit under any circumstances.

 

It went further than the government's own planned motion, which noted that parliament did not want to leave without a deal on March 29, the leaving date set down in law, but stressed that the default legal position was to leave without a deal unless one was ratified by parliament.

 

While the approved motion has no legal force and ultimately may not prevent a no-deal exit, it carries considerable political force, especially as it passed thanks to a substantial rebellion by members of May's own Conservative Party and her cabinet.

 

May, who had insisted that it was not possible to completely rule out a no-deal Brexit, said lawmakers would need to agree a way forward before an extension could be obtained.

 

The government said it would on Thursday propose seeking to delay Brexit until June 30 if parliament can - by March 20, the day before an EU summit - approve a deal to leave the European Union. The government did not say which day it planned to hold another vote.

 

Commentators believe that with a no-deal Brexit voted down, May will now hope to persuade hardline pro-Brexit lawmakers to vote for her deal on the grounds that the alternatives offer a less clean break with the EU.

 

If no deal is agreed by March 20, "then it is highly likely the European Council at its meeting the following day would require a clear purpose for any extension, not least to determine its length, and any extension beyond 30 June 2019 would require the United Kingdom to hold European Parliament elections in May 2019", Thursday's motion says.

 

"DEAL STILL NEEDED"

After Wednesday's vote, the European Commission promptly restated its position that it was not enough for parliament to vote against leaving the European Union without a deal -- it also needed to find a deal that lawmakers could accept.

 

The outcome of the vote angered many pro-Brexit members of the Conservative Party, who had wanted to retain the option of a "no-deal" exit as a bargaining chip, knowing that it would cause disruption in the EU as well as Britain.

 

After two-and-a-half years of negotiations and two failed attempts to pass a Brexit deal proposed by May, the vote against a no-deal exit still leaves undecided how, when and on what terms Britain will leave the club it joined in 1973.

 

After lawmakers crushed her deal for a second time on Tuesday, May said it was still the best option for leaving in an orderly fashion.

 

The pound rose more than 2 percent on the rejection of 'no-deal' and was headed for its biggest daily gain this year. [GBP/]

 

As the United Kingdom's three-year Brexit crisis spins towards its finale, diplomats and investors see four main options: a delay, May's deal passing at the last minute, an accidental no-deal exit or another referendum.

 

DELAY UNTIL WHEN?

If Britain does seek a delay, it will require the agreement of all the bloc's other 27 members.

 

The EU would prefer only a short extension, ending before EU-wide parliamentary elections due May 24-26, although it is not clear that this would be long enough to solve the impasse in London. The new European Parliament convenes on July 2.

 

EU Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier said the bloc would need to know why Britain wanted to extend talks and that it was up to London to find a way out of the deadlock. The EU said there could be no more negotiations on the divorce terms.

 

Britons voted by 52-48 percent in 2016 to leave the bloc, a decision that has split the main political parties and exposed deep rifts in British society.

 

May's deal covers such things as citizens' rights, the status of the Irish border and Britain's divorce bill from the EU. It takes Britain out of the EU single market and customs union, common fisheries and farm policies and the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. It also offers a status-quo transition period in which to negotiate trade arrangements.

 

Under a no-deal exit, there would be no transition period to soften the disruption to trade and regulations. Britain would quit the EU's 500 million-strong single market and customs union and fall back on World Trade Organisation rules, which could mean tariffs on many imports and exports.

 

(Additional reporting by Elisabeth O'Leary and Alastair Macdonald in Brussels; Writing by Michael Holden, Guy Faulconbridge and Giles Elgood; Editing by Janet Lawrence and Kevin Liffey)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-03-14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Grouse said:

 

Just rejoice!

 

Following an excellent Spring statement from the chancellor, No deal Brexit is now off the table!

 

Despite the CONs three line whip, they have been handed their head on a plate by parliament.

 

Saint Yvette Cooper led rebels to take control.

 

Parliament can now do what it should have done BEFORE triggering A50 and explore which options could carry a majority.

 

The icing on the cake is that LAB now look unelectable. McDonnells miserable response to Spreadsheet and the look on the faces of Aqualung and the Shadow Chancellor, said it all. 

 

I would go with N+ being the Nash Equilbrium solution. However, there is a good chance of Brexit being stopped if the EU refuse an extension because A50 would have to be pulled.

 

So! "Oh Happy Day" when so many CONs walked and mininsters abstained!

The Yorkshireman explains what went off....

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Laughing Gravy said:

As these politicians won't respect the referendum result and two party manifestos, a GE should be called. 

 

I can't see this happening, as so many would be shown the door and the EU won't want that, as a brexiteer could lead the house. As reported yesterday on Sky news a dozen Farages (very conservative IMO) could be elected too. No these gutless MP's will continue to thwart democracy and save their own bacon, for as long as they can.

Blinkered opinion. We now get to look at other Brexit options including ones proposed by Brexiters up to, during and after the referendum. Hard Brexit is a lost cause. So is May's deal. However, there will be no referendum until parliament has looked into various softer Brexit options.

 

BTW, the tariffs proposed are a dogs breakfast. 10% plus on European and other none U.K. Cars. No tariffs on cereal crops which will hurt agriculture. High tariffs on meat which will keep out ANZ and US. Oranges and lemons might be cheaper. CBI is incandescent.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, steve187 said:

you seem to have a blinkered opinion and critise everyone that differs from you, please show what all these 'many other possibles deals' and ' Several options were suggested by the EU.'  are, as i keep seeing quoted by the EU front men that there will be no changes to the deal.

 

 

No, I criticising you

 

Canada

Norway

Switzerland

EEC2

N+

 

and many other bespoke options

 

No deal

Hard Brexit deal

May's red deal

 

Are all dead now

 

OK? You want more?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, vogie said:

Why is no deal dead now, last nights vote was only advisory. When Parliament triggered art 50 it became law that we leave with a deal or leave without a deal. The only way to get no deal off the table is to vote for a deal or revoke art 50.

Brexiteer trots out ‘only advisory’ without an ounce of irony, let alone introspection.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Laughing Gravy said:

Oh dear another original response and a bus. Ingenious.

 

There was a democratic referendum, There was also a GE. Regardless of peoples opinions or facts. Anyone who can say that it is a fact that this will happen after leaving the EU is quite frankly a fool, as we have not left yet. Suggestions and forecasts yes but facts, no they can't. Many MPs are going against their constituents wishes, as many are openly saying. How superior they are.

 

Here is just one example.

 

http://www.ukpol.co.uk/margaret-beckett-2017-speech-on-withdrawing-from-the-eu/

May I say at once that although I deeply regret the decision made by the British people, including in my constituency, to leave the EU, I do not seek to challenge it?

 

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/8548383/brexit-mps-ignoring-leave-voting-constituents/

 

 

And yesterday there was a vote in Parliament.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Laughing Gravy said:

I will agree with you ion this.

 

And on this.

 

This not at all. So peoples believes are nonsense. What shall it be then Communism. Dictatorship. Military rule. 2 votes for those with a university degree. 1 for the lesser people.

 

Two out of three ain’t bad.

 

In some cultures we’d be married off on the basis of this...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...