Jump to content

Under pressure, U.S. Justice Department defends handling of Mueller report


webfact

Recommended Posts

Under pressure, U.S. Justice Department defends handling of Mueller report

By Andy Sullivan

 

2019-04-04T161543Z_1_LYNXNPEF331ID_RTROPTP_3_USA-TRUMP-RUSSIA.JPG

FILE PHOTO: U.S. Attorney General William Barr delivers remarks at a Justice Department African American History Month event in Washington, U.S., February 26, 2019. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas/File Photo

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department on Thursday defended its handling of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report examining contacts between President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign and Russia as it faced increased pressure to make the document public.

 

The department said Attorney General William Barr must strike confidential information from the nearly 400-page document as reports surfaced in the news media that members of Mueller's team were unhappy with the way Barr had characterized its main conclusions.

 

House of Representatives Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, already pressing Barr to release the entire unredacted report to Congress, expanded his demands. Nadler, a Democrat, called on Barr to immediately release summaries of the document prepared by Mueller's team. He also asked Barr to hand over communications between the special counsel's team and the department about the report.

 

The department said those summaries include secret grand jury information that cannot under law be made public.

 

Barr, appointed by the Republican president, has pledged to release a redacted version of the report by mid-April.

 

Barr said last week that Mueller's 22-month inquiry did not establish that Trump's campaign conspired with Russia in the election. Barr also said Mueller also did not reach a conclusion on whether Trump had illegally interfered with the Russia investigation, which has cast a shadow over his presidency.

 

While Mueller did not exonerate Trump, Barr said he then concluded there was not enough evidence to show that Trump committed the crime of obstruction of justice.

 

The New York Times and the Washington Post reported that some investigators were unhappy with the way Barr had described their findings, in a sign of tensions between some members of Mueller's team and administration officials overseeing the report's release.

 

Every page of Mueller's report contains a warning that it might contain confidential material, so Barr decided first to release the report's main findings as quickly as possible, Justice Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said.

 

"The Department continues to work with the Special Counsel on appropriate redactions to the report so that it can be released to Congress and the public," Kupec said in a statement.

 

The Judiciary Committee authorized Nadler on Wednesday to subpoena the department to obtain Mueller's full report, moving closer to a legal clash with the Trump administration.

 

Congress, not Barr, should determine what gets made public, Nadler said. He has yet to issue a subpoena.

 

"We are entitled to that information and we need that information," Nadler told reporters on Thursday.

 

FBI Director Christopher Wray told Congress he had not seen Mueller's report.

 

(Additional reporting by David Morgan and Sarah N. Lynch; Editing by Will Dunham and Ross Colvin)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-04-05
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Funny how Barr got sucked into the 45 web of corruption and lies.

Noticed how nearly everyone who gets near DT eventually gets ruined? 

Sort of like he's radiating misfortune. 

Not just to the people who betray him, he takes pleasure in bashing those who kiss his backside.  Remember Sean Spicer? 

 

 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Funny how Barr got sucked into the 45 web of corruption and lies. He had a solid reputation but felt he had to emerge from retirement to be an obvious lackey. This is how he'll be remembered now. Only this. Why?

 

Maybe there's something to that "Deep State" business. A cadre of benchwarmers that can be called upon at any time to keep the train on the tracks.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jingthing said:

Sounds more like that you don't believe the sources. Let's split it half way. Release the full unredacted report to congress! Release the full unredacted summaries by Mueller ASAP to the public. Then we can talk about what's real and what is not real.

There are no named sources.

My thoughts on the release have been well stated already.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DoctorG said:

There are no named sources.

My thoughts on the release have been well stated already.

I don't know your thoughts.

I do know that unnamed sources are used by the press all the time and just being unnamed is not conclusive that they are false sources.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Barr writes letter providing misleading summary to Congress, then writes two more letters trying to claim the first is not a summary.

Now we learn those who wrote the report are saying Barr is misrepresenting it’s findings.

 

It’s so often the attempted cover up

that reveals the crimes.

 

What a difference a House Majority makes.

 

 

 

 

so you know without any doubt, based on facts of course, the summary is misleading. amazing

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

I don't know your thoughts.

I do know that unnamed sources are used by the press all the time and just being unnamed is not conclusive that they are false sources.

or that they are real, or in any way factual

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Funny how Barr got sucked into the 45 web of corruption and lies. He had a solid reputation but felt he had to emerge from retirement to be an obvious lackey. This is how he'll be remembered now. Only this. Why?

nice assumptions without a shred of factual reality, bolstered by the biased opinion of you

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jingthing said:

Let the report be released to congress in full ASAP.

The only reason to oppose that is if you think that Barr is covering up for 45.

 

so when the grand jury portions are redacted, will you cry cover up, still?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, elmrfudd said:

so when the grand jury portions are redacted, will you cry cover up, still?

Stop the games.

The complete report including the grand jury portions must be released to congress.

Releasing to congress is not the same as releasing everything to the public.

It's not the AG's job to redact. Period. This is for congress to deal with. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jingthing said:

Yeah, you're not biased.

Of course I'm biased against 45. It's incompressible to me how anyone that has digested what we already know about him isn't. He's a total disgrace and dark stain on American history. 

fortunately, millions of people do not share your self righteous opinions, even if you continue to berate those who

disagree with you with your biased opinion. get over it

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jingthing said:

Stop the games.

The complete report including the grand jury portions must be released to congress.

Releasing to congress is not the same as releasing everything to the public.

It's not the AG's job to redact. Period. This is for congress to deal with. 

blather. the rules say what has to be redacted. throwing a tantrum won't get around it

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, elmrfudd said:

fortunately, millions of people do not share your self righteous opinions, even if you continue to berate those who

disagree with you with your biased opinion. get over it

Yes, I understand. About 35 percent of Americans are in the hard core 45 base. The portion of Americans that would still be with him, as he openly said, if he went out on the street and murdered someone. That's a crying shame but that's the dark reality Americans are dealing with.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, elmrfudd said:

blather. the rules say what has to be redacted. throwing a tantrum won't get around it

Actually, no they don't.

The AG is NOT legally bound to redact grand jury material.

That's a fake excuse.

Deal with the facts.

You're not fooling anyone here really.

It's obvious that you also realize that there is dark damaging to 45 stuff in that report. You want it suppressed. I consider that un-American. Are we an open democracy or a dictatorship by an unhinged authoritarian demagogue. Release it all to congress!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, elmrfudd said:

fortunately, millions of people do not share your self righteous opinions, even if you continue to berate those who

disagree with you with your biased opinion. get over it

I guess we have to take your word  your opinions on TV are unbiased.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...