Jump to content

Democrats make legal bid for all Russia probe evidence, Trump poll numbers drop


rooster59

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, lannarebirth said:

 

But they knew he was a criminal when they voted for him. Respect the democratic process. Find someone better to vote for and move on.  If they hang him up in one of the other investigations, that's fine. No less than what he's had coming to him for decades; but don't throw him out of office for being the guy everyone knew he was already. Less than 19 months till elections. 

"But they knew he was a criminal when they voted for him."

Pretty lame reasoning. Fair to say, most people probably thought he would act a little more presidential once he became POTUS.

But on the contrary, he never reined it in at all. He continued to act like a real estate developer/contractor hustling cement contracts. (make him an offer he can't refuse)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, neeray said:

"But they knew he was a criminal when they voted for him."

Pretty lame reasoning. Fair to say, most people probably thought he would act a little more presidential once he became POTUS.

But on the contrary, he never reined it in at all. He continued to act like a real estate developer/contractor hustling cement contracts. (make him an offer he can't refuse)

People knew the Clintons were criminals (Tyson futures / contamination bailout) scandal and at least one a philanderer (with reports of rapist) when they voted for them in their first presidential election. They continued in the same manner through two terms. Fortunately they had the power of the press behind them and they installed 4,000 people in varying agencies who would come to their defence when called upon. Some of these people later became "talking heads" , without disclosure during the HRC presidential campaign.

 

Is Trump a POS? Without question. Here's my suggestion. Stop electing P's OS of whichever party.

 

 

 

 

Edited by lannarebirth
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the reuter report is a partisan political issue filled with verbal antitrump language. reuters is omitting vital details such as that congress member have the legal right to see the unredacted report for example adam schiff has access and can make it public on the congress floor.

 

clown nadler's supenoe is a mere dem propaganda.

 

impeachment for no collusion, no obstruction dems as usual in political limbo.

 

wbr

roobaa01

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, rooster59 said:

Watch out for people that take so-called “notes,” when the notes never existed until needed." Trump wrote,

Unless those folk support trump, like ass chugging Brett kav with his thirty year old calendar notes ????

 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Nyezhov said:

Get what? Nobody objects to him having it, except GJ testimony/infrmation which is controlled by statute.

 

More posturing to try to avoid the day of reckoning.

What planet are you living on?

 

they (congress) made it clear they wanted it all, but got a redacted version with an offer of a less redacted version, in need. They made it clear they needed, but trumps pet bullfrog did not provide, in consultation with White House lawyers, which is indeed more posturing to try and avoid the day of reckoning.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, farcanell said:

What planet are you living on?

 

they (congress) made it clear they wanted it all, but got a redacted version with an offer of a less redacted version, in need. They made it clear they needed, but trumps pet bullfrog did not provide, in consultation with White House lawyers, which is indeed more posturing to try and avoid the day of reckoning.

 

Do you really think that any salient missing pieces would not have been leaked by now, or are about to be leaked? If a smoking gun exists you'll hear about it. Patience is a vtrtue.

Edited by lannarebirth
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Boon Mee said:

The 2 year long Witch Hunt is over and now time for some well-deserved payback. The investigators are now going to be investigated. 

Mueller must be quaking in his boots..... but somehow I doubt “Barr is coming” will ever be as funny as “muellertime” etc etc 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, lannarebirth said:

 

Sure he has, but if you want to convict him of that you need to produce the evidence.  Personally, I passed judgement on Trump 35 years ago and my opinion hasn't changed since.

Ergo congressional committee demands for the evidence

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, lannarebirth said:

 

About 10% of the 448 page report was redacted. Most of the redactions come in the first half of the report, concerning Russian interference and possible collusion. Trump was cleared on these charges. A smaller amount was in the second half of the report which concern obstruction of justice, most of which we all witnessed first hand. There's not going to be a big "smoking gun". What you're going to find is Trump being Trump, which of course everyone knows is his MO.

So..... about 45 to 50 pages of the report where redacted?

 

thats a lot of redaction, a lot of words, even if it’s only 10% of the total.... but I agree, there is no big smoking gun.... maybe a lot of little ones, establishing a pattern of criminality, but no big ones.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, farcanell said:

So..... about 45 to 50 pages of the report where redacted?

 

thats a lot of redaction, a lot of words, even if it’s only 10% of the total.... but I agree, there is no big smoking gun.... maybe a lot of little ones, establishing a pattern of criminality, but no big ones.

 

Trump has engaged in a pattern of criminalty all his adult life, and maybe before that. As far as I'm concerned it's like petting a snake and then blaming it for biting you. You knew it was a snake, right?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, lannarebirth said:

 

Trump has engaged in a pattern of criminalty all his adult life, and maybe before that. As far as I'm concerned it's like petting a snake and then blaming it for biting you. You knew it was a snake, right?

Great comment.... hard to argue with that logic... 

 

https://darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2004-15.html

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, riclag said:

The

 

Yup, He wasn't suppose to win! The billionaire outsider that even minorities,celebrities liked, while at the same time  many in MSM called arrogant each time he floated his opinions of his political aspirations during the years. A populist  who dared to take on Dodge City(The swamp)!  Something tells me the left's boogeyman is  not  quite finished blowin Dodge,he just wasted  almost 3 years fighting it,almost  to the point of obstructing the hoax!  No collusion,No conspiracy and no obstruction! There is much much more of the swamp to expose now that the Mueller hoax has finished ! Stay tuned  

 Image result for wile e coyote time clock

 

The only evidence we have of Trump being a billionaire is his own statements or statements made by others that are traceable back to Trump's own statements. 

 

As we know Trump is a habitual liar, but don't fret, his tax returns will settle the matter. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Thainesss said:

 

Well, considering the margin of error for the poll itself is +/- 3.5 percentage points, and they oversampled Democrats in this poll VS oversampling Republicans in the previous one, I wouldnt get my hopes up if I was you. 

 

https://graphics.reuters.com/USA-TRUMP-RUSSIA-POLL/010091JB28J/Mueller Investigation Report 04 19 2019 TRENDED PID.pdf

 

With his current numbers, he couldn’t win an election right now.  Russia gave him his last win, and he didn’t even win the popular vote, and most people didn’t like Hillary.  When Americans find out he and his family have not payed taxes for decades, the party is over anyway-in addition to the evidence pertaining to at least a dozen more investigations 

Edited by Redline
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...