Jump to content


Affidavit of income


Recommended Posts

Dr Mr,

I have seen that topic on another forum before. What we don't know is 'why' the affidavit has not been accepted. Maybe the figures were so unreal IO refused it as a Belgian affidavit is still accepted in general.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was the Belgian national informing TVF members that my affidavit (the same as described by above Confiscius) was refused for the first time in more than 10 years. The reason given by IO was correct i.e. that the legalisation stamp applied by the Embassy only certifies it is my signature but not that my declaration of income is true (or not true).  

Indeed since more than 30 years I know that on the Belgian legalisation stamp it is mentioned in Dutch, French and German that "This legalisation does not guarantee the authenticity of the document".

Signing a false affidavit would be a criminal offense but I cannot blame the IO that from now on evidence of bank transfers would be required. Luckily I had records of bank transfers covering one year and much more than the amount legally required : the IO accepted this evidence to grant me another extension but asked that in future I would make monthly transfers and not sometimes every 2 or 3 months as I did in the past. However I was surprised when I asked if in future I would then only have to submit the monthly bank records supplied by my bank (SCB) and the answer was that I would need both the above legalised affidavit  + the SCB bank statement. I repeated my question to make sure there was no misunderstanding and I got the same reply about the need for both the legalised affidavit and the proof of bank transfers to my SCB account.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, easydoor said:

What we don't know is 'why' the affidavit has not been accepted.

Because it just certified the applicant's signature, but didn't verify that the claimed income was correct.

 

That's why some embassies stopped doing the affidavit ... they were unable and/or unwilling to verify the amount of income, only the identity of the person who signed the affidavit.

 

5 hours ago, Confuscious said:

The affidavit of income from the Belgian Embassy ONLY checks your own signature.
Not your income.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, easydoor said:

Dr Mr,

I have seen that topic on another forum before. What we don't know is 'why' the affidavit has not been accepted. Maybe the figures were so unreal IO refused it as a Belgian affidavit is still accepted in general.

...because it is "not needed".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, fvw53 said:

I was the Belgian national informing TVF members that my affidavit (the same as described by above Confiscius) was refused for the first time in more than 10 years. The reason given by IO was correct i.e. that the legalisation stamp applied by the Embassy only certifies it is my signature but not that my declaration of income is true (or not true).  

Indeed since more than 30 years I know that on the Belgian legalisation stamp it is mentioned in Dutch, French and German that "This legalisation does not guarantee the authenticity of the document".

Signing a false affidavit would be a criminal offense but I cannot blame the IO that from now on evidence of bank transfers would be required. Luckily I had records of bank transfers covering one year and much more than the amount legally required : the IO accepted this evidence to grant me another extension but asked that in future I would make monthly transfers and not sometimes every 2 or 3 months as I did in the past. However I was surprised when I asked if in future I would then only have to submit the monthly bank records supplied by my bank (SCB) and the answer was that I would need both the above legalised affidavit  + the SCB bank statement. I repeated my question to make sure there was no misunderstanding and I got the same reply about the need for both the legalised affidavit and the proof of bank transfers to my SCB account.

I think that’s pretty much the same with the other embassies who are no longer providing the documentation to support income.

At the Australian Embassy I used to sign what was called a statutory declaration in which I declared my income, the signature was then witnessed and I think stamped by an official.

It is a criminal offense in Australia to provide false information in such a document.

The Embassy will still certify such documents for other purposes so it is not them being difficult as some on the site claim but because they are not able to confirm that the information is correct, which is not their role in any event.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just got my extension last Friday using an income affidavit obtained at the US Embassy in December, just before they stopped giving them (they're good for 6 months). I was told that for my next extension I'll have to show the 12 months of 65K transfers from the US and a statement of what the source of the funds are, in my case a pension. I asked if my original pension award letter, which states that x is the amount I will be receiving for life is sufficient and was told that it would be fine.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nickstav said:

just got my extension last Friday using an income affidavit obtained at the US Embassy in December, just before they stopped giving them (they're good for 6 months). I was told that for my next extension I'll have to show the 12 months of 65K transfers from the US and a statement of what the source of the funds are, in my case a pension. I asked if my original pension award letter, which states that x is the amount I will be receiving for life is sufficient and was told that it would be fine.

Thanks for the report and info.  Could you please say what Immigration office you used?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/24/2019 at 5:46 PM, nickstav said:

I just got my extension last Friday using an income affidavit obtained at the US Embassy in December, just before they stopped giving them (they're good for 6 months). I was told that for my next extension I'll have to show the 12 months of 65K transfers from the US and a statement of what the source of the funds are, in my case a pension. I asked if my original pension award letter, which states that x is the amount I will be receiving for life is sufficient and was told that it would be fine.

So, in the case of us Brits, the supporting evidence which our Embassy used to require us to provide for their income confirmation letters should presumably do the trick here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, OJAS said:

So, in the case of us Brits, the supporting evidence which our Embassy used to require us to provide for their income confirmation letters should presumably do the trick here?

If that includes 12 months of bank transfers from abroad.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In January of next year, i plan on printing off my DFAS and VA letters which are on official govt letterhead and taking them into immigration with the letter from kasikorn showing my 12 deposits.  The only thing i am worried about is some of them arrive on the 30th some on the 2nd, but if they count em all up they are there.  Does anyone see that as a potential problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, marcusarelus said:

If that includes 12 months of bank transfers from abroad.

So do you mean 12 months of outgoing transfers in statements provided by our home country bank (in addition to incoming transfer statements provided by our Thai bank, which I shall be providing in any event)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OJAS said:

So, in the case of us Brits, the supporting evidence which our Embassy used to require us to provide for their income confirmation letters should presumably do the trick here?

Well not solely. You would need to show it coming into Thailand every month at 65,000 baht or more too. Along with bank letter etc etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I used the Statement of my pension instead of the Affidavit of the Belgian embassy again this year.
Only, this year I did not bring an Affidavit with me.
Statement of pension accepted again without further demands.
Translation costs was this year only 300 baht as most of the text was similar as last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Confuscious said:

I used the Statement of my pension instead of the Affidavit of the Belgian embassy again this year.
Only, this year I did not bring an Affidavit with me.
Statement of pension accepted again without further demands.
Translation costs was this year only 300 baht as most of the text was similar as last year.

It saves a lot of time to get an affidavit legalised by the Embassy then translated and legalised at the Foreign Ministry. Two months ago I tried the same like you but Immigration Officer in Pathum Thani insisted that I would get also an affidavit legalised next to my detailed bank letter of my monthly transfers /  it really depends on the Immigration office.

The Belgian legalisation stamp explains clearly that this is only a certification of my signature and not of my (income) declaration but it is written only in our national languages i.e. Dutch, French and German

In which province is your Immigration Office?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.