REPORT: Organic products face new challenges as market moves online

[rooster59]

REPORT: Organic products face new challenges as market moves online

By PIYAPORN WONGRUANG 
THE NATION WEEKEND

 

Courtesy of Greennet.

 

Every one’s going organic, but few really care about the essence of “being organic”

 

The Growing demand for “clean and green” food is having an immediate effect in both the real and virtual worlds, but there is still doubt as to whether people are grasping the essence of being fully organic, with sustainable agriculture and fair trade. 

 

This doubt was aired at a recent Food Security Assembly forum spearheaded by BioThai – Thailand’s top campaigner for food security and biodiversity – and its 30-plus allies in networks dedicated to sustainable and alternative agriculture. 

 

The concept of organic products arose more than 20 years ago as a symbol in the fight against a so-called green revolution by farming communities. Markets were created as platforms to offer these goods as alternatives.

 

With lifestyles now shifting, the demand for clean food is growing and conventional markets, modern trade outlets and even the new online-retail option created by Jack Ma are adding green goods to their line-up of products. 

 

However, food-security advocates and economists believe the growing call for clean, green food can present challenges. 

 

Independent researcher Premkamol Phukaew, who presented her findings at the forum, said more fresh markets in Bangkok and neighbouring provinces were selling organic products, and some traders were opting for technology such as QR codes to boost sales. 

 

But hygiene remains an issue because these markets are not well regulated. In her study using data from the Bangkok Food Sanitation Office, Premkamol found that only 350 of the 1,120 markets in the city were regulated. In the rest there are no official checks on standards or hygiene. 

 

“The state is only controlling 30 per cent of the markets, so the question is whether the authorities will ever notice this and take action to improve the standards,” Premkamol said. 

 

BioThai network Thai-Pan recently conducted random checks on vegetables sold at such markets and found that more than half the samples were contaminated by chemicals, she said. 

 

Sellers’ understanding and the attitude of market owners, she said, play a key role in lifting standards in markets where state measures are obviously absent. 

 

The markets have managed to survive despite the shift in retail trends because they play a major role in connecting buyers with producers. 

 

A study by Oxfam Thailand found that modern trade outlets, such as large supermarkets and hypermarts, have also started carrying organic products in response to demand, said Theerawit Chainarongsophon, who works in private-sector engagement at Oxfam. 

 

He pointed out that the market value of the modern-trade sector stood at Bt2.3 trillion last year, despite there being few outlets. BioThai noted that such outlets hold a 50-per-cent share in the food market, while convenience stores command a share of up to 75 per cent among ready-to-eat products. 

 

However, these outlets do not quite pay heed to fair trade. A study by Oxfam International found that at least 30 per cent of their earnings go to the operators and barely 14 per cent to farmers. 

 

“This is an unfair and unbalanced distribution of the benefits,” Theerawit said. 

 

Oxfam Thailand found similar data when studying the distribution of income in Thailand’s shrimp industry. It discovered that up to 30 per cent of earnings went to modern-trade operators, while producers were given so little that they suffered food insecurity themselves. 

 

Theerawit said fair trade and food security were clearly the challenges faced by producers when they engage with modern trade, which has played more role in a food chain and bcome in more direct contact with producers.

 

Then there’s the new retail toy created by Ma, which is posing fresh challenges since modern technology moves high volumes of goods across borders at cheaper costs, but leaves farmers empty-handed. 

 

“There is a big change in relationships in the food chain. Monopolies and manipulation of production and distribution are posing new concerns,” said Kingkorn Narintarakul Na Ayutthaya, BioThai’s deputy director.

 

Virtual or application-based e-markets are also changing the way food is bought and produced. In South Korea, for instance, photos of food items are posted on public trains and buses and people can order these items using their phones. This trend appears to be coming to Thailand as well. 

 

Kingkorn said the trend is growing in the Asia region mainly because so many people live in cramped cities. “This type of trade could even kill fresh markets,” she said. 

 

Food-security advocates and economists say that, although markets and modern outlets have decided to put clean food on their shelves, they still ignore the mainstay of organic food – sustainable agriculture and fair trade – which is leaving farmers at the source of the food chain hungry. 

 

They blame the trend on consumers’ drive to be healthier. In their hunger for clean food, few people think about the producers who are critical to the food chain and its sustainability. 

 

Independent economist Sarinee Achavanuntakul, founder of Sal Forest – a company that promotes sustainable business growth – said her research shows there are different terms used to define organic products and “health food”, and the market values of these two categories are vastly different. 

 

For instance, she said, organic products generated around Bt1 billion last year, while health food earned Bt170 billion – a clear reflection on consumption trends and perception. 

 

She said the biggest challenge for clean products and markets was maintaining their value at competitive levels. 

 

While some green markets serve their local communities, the operators should think more about their unique value and how they can contribute to new trends and changing lifestyles. 

 

“Maybe it’s not about green or alternative markets, but more about marketing, about how we can lift our producers and connect them in the correct way with consumers. This will help us focus and reposition the organic-food chain in line with new market trends,” Sarinee said.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30371127

 

-- © Copyright The Nation 2019-06-15

Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking Thailand news and visa info

[trainman34014]

I don't trust Thai so called organic produce unless it comes from the Royal Project shops.    In a country that cheats and lies at every turn and everyone on the take, who can believe in anything that is so unregulated, not to mention where it is regulated the 'regulators' accept brown envelopes !

[legend49]

21 hours ago, trainman34014 said:

I don't trust Thai so called organic produce unless it comes from the Royal Project shops.    In a country that cheats and lies at every turn and everyone on the take, who can believe in anything that is so unregulated, not to mention where it is regulated the 'regulators' accept brown envelopes !

I bought Organic paint last week from Home Pro that mean its no good?

[Antonymous]

This article jumbles several key issues together as one and I find it confusing.

 

Fair compensation to farmers – whether they grow organic or otherwise – is one issue that I agree should be addressed and a study of land use and ownership and the supply chain are key parts of that.

 

Organic food growing and regulation to ensure that food that is labelled ‘organic’ really does meet the necessary criteria is another quite separate issue that surely should be addressed.

 

Proper monitoring of fresh markets (and supermarkets) to ensure that the places are hygienic and that the food they sell is safe for consumption is yet another important issue. Again this applies to organic and non-organic produce.

 

And then we have ‘modern trade operators’ and ‘modern technology’ mentioned in this article in a way that seems to suggest that these are damaging trends. They certainly don’t need to be and the better able these are in bringing consumers what they demand the better it is for all concerned, including the producers.

 

As for: “They blame the trend on consumers’ drive to be healthier. In their hunger for clean food, few people think about the producers who are critical to the food chain and its sustainability” what exactly is the author suggesting? Are consumers wrong to demand healthy food?

 

Despite the confusion within the body of this article, I can wholeheartedly agree at least with the closing statement:

 

“Maybe it’s not about green or alternative markets, but more about marketing, about how we can lift our producers and connect them in the correct way with consumers.”

 

Personally I grow as many vegetables and fruits as I can, organically, in my garden plot. What I can’t grow myself I buy wherever I can.

Edited June 16, 2019 by Antonymous
Spacing

[TallGuyJohninBKK]

23 hours ago, trainman34014 said:

I don't trust Thai so called organic produce unless it comes from the Royal Project shops.    In a country that cheats and lies at every turn and everyone on the take, who can believe in anything that is so unregulated, not to mention where it is regulated the 'regulators' accept brown envelopes !

 

Royal Project produce is not necessarily organic. They've specifically said in the past that they don't blanket prohibit the use of pesticides in their fields, AFAIK.

 

Although, the notion that they are organic seems to be a common misperception here.

 

 

Edited June 16, 2019 by TallGuyJohninBKK

[TallGuyJohninBKK]

9 minutes ago, Antonymous said:

This article jumbles several key issues together as one and I find it confusing.

I agree. It's a jumbled mess of an article that tosses all kinds of odds and ends into one pot.

 

The bottom line for me is, meaningful, reliable regulation of organic quality doesn't exist in Thailand, and lots of food products here that are labeled as organic end up having pesticide content and residues, for one reason or another. It's a whole lot of fake/false advertising.

 

And I say that as a supporter of organic foods and someone who believes in the value and health of eating them.... but only if they're truly organic!

 

 

Edited June 16, 2019 by TallGuyJohninBKK

[ncc1701d]

I have been told by more than one nutritionalist that “organic” is not necessarily better in that they contain a lot of free radicals. Personally I have no idea what a free radical is or does, but they weren’t very happy about them. Not to mention the cost of the same thing but with “organic” written on it can be as high as 4 times the price. An organic celery stick is certainly not 4 times better for me than a normal one.