Jump to content

UK far-right activist Tommy Robinson convicted in contempt-of-court case


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, petemoss said:

You back up your claim that he didn't. Fortunately the majority of his most vile and racist comments have been removed from YouTube some time ago.

I'm not the one gobbing off!

I don't like the bloke but he isn't what they want him to be & that IMO might just explain why so many supporters pop up whenever he's being shafted.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, evadgib said:

Not in the age of social media it isn't; despite the latter de-platforming him. Why would they do that?

Because he posted content that broke with the terms and conditions of the service he was using. 

 

Posted
15 minutes ago, petemoss said:

 

A wider audience than the BBC and almost every national newspaper? All Mr Islam did was cloud the issue by claiming that all Moslems are the same and should be thrown out of the country, or "sent back to where they came from" as he likes to put it, even though the majority were born and bred in the UK.

Mate, 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Because he posted content that broke with the terms and conditions of the service he was using. 

That's a better answer but I suspect there's more to it than that.

Posted
5 minutes ago, evadgib said:

I'm not the one gobbing off!

I don't like the bloke but he isn't what they want him to be & that IMO might just explain why so many supporters pop up whenever he's being shafted.

Either tat or there are quite a few closet racists on the forum.

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, petemoss said:

Either tat or there are quite a few closet racists on the forum.

Married to Thais with dual national kids?

Excellent disguise ????

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, evadgib said:

Married to Thais with dual national kids?

Excellent disguise ????

As I've already pointed out in this thread. Racists and hypocrites.

  • Confused 1
Posted
16 hours ago, armadillo215 said:

I have followed this very closely and actually it is you and others in this conversation who should educate yourselves. 

Right wing narcissist? What's that about. OK globalist, socialist I am of the duck and cover generation and I have seen socialist/communist governments do. I want to keep what i earn...

Actually I have voted Conservative all my life , sorry to burst your narrow minded bubble !

You have not followed this affair closely , you have simply indulged yourself with an exercise in bias confirmation.

Learn some history and reflect on the success ( lack of ) and longevity of popularist Nationalism, as I said educate yourself.

Posted
8 minutes ago, petemoss said:

As I've already pointed out in this thread. Racists and hypocrites.

And as I've already pointed out put up or shut up.

  • Like 2
Posted
8 hours ago, SheungWan said:

As former member of the EDF rather difficult not to.

Sent from my SM-N935F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

I used to get my electricity from the EDF in London till they kept putting their prices up. But I never knew anyone who was a member of it.

Posted
1 minute ago, evadgib said:

And as I've already pointed out put up or shut up.

You can't run from the truth that easily. I've already given my views on Tommy Islam and his supporters and why I hold those views.

Posted
59 minutes ago, petemoss said:

Your argument is completely and utterly flawed (as usual). Tommy Islam hasn't exposed one single rape gang. He lived in Luton, where one of the grooming gangs operated. He didn't expose them, he just jumped on the bandwagon after they'd been exposed, in order to peddle hia racist filth and gain clicks (money) for his YouTube channel. His claim to be a crusading grooming gang buster is a complete sham. He's just an obnoxious little racist football hooligan, who calls all Moslems scum on the actions of a few. A typical, thick as pig dung racist self-pleasurer.

 

So, in answer to your question, yes, anyone supporting an obnoxious little racist football hooligan is likely to be labelled a racist themselves. If the cap fits wear it. It certainly fits several other Brexiteers posting in this thread.

 

BTW. You weren't stating facts about Yaxley Lennons court case, you were commenting on the football hooligans who attacked KhaoYai. You're classic, constantly picking holes in other peoples posts (aka trolling) without contributing anything useful yourself.

It was Nick Griffin and the BNP who were the ones to stand yup and expose the Muslim rape gangs .

Yes, everyone didnt believe them and just called them racists as well .

Tommy may have joined the BNP because they were the only people voicing their concerns about the rape gangs .

I oppose rape gangs , whatever colour they may be  , up to you if you want to call me a racist for supporting other people who oppose the rape of children .

I did also post facts about Tommys mortgage fraud conviction and I have previously posted BBC reports to back this up .

Where is the connection between football hooligans and the people whom Khaoyoi had a fight with ?

That happened in a nightclub , nothing to do with football hooligans  , just people fighting, which happens all across the Uk most week-ends

  • Like 2
Posted
On 7/7/2019 at 11:11 AM, dick dasterdly said:

 

I'm still failing to see how the desperate defense attempt to ask for a retrial could have succeeded, bearing in mind the jurors were already deliberating on their decision?

Because until the jury has delivered its verdict, the trial is not over. The time when the jury is trying to make up their minds on the verdict, is probably the time when they're most susceptible to bring influenced. 

 

As the Independent article points out, not one but five defence lawyers filed an application to have the jury discharged. Any time that happens, then according to the Law Commission's report on Contempt of Court by Publication, the whole trial proceedings are in jeopardy. Here's a quotation from that report.

 

Quote

In Attorney General v Random House Group Ltd it was held that a publication which gives rise to applications by the defence to discharge the jury, causing delays and the risk that the judge would discharge the jury, creates a substantial risk of serious impediment.

 

Posted
9 minutes ago, joecoolfrog said:

Actually I have voted Conservative all my life , sorry to burst your narrow minded bubble !

You have not followed this affair closely , you have simply indulged yourself with an exercise in bias confirmation.

Learn some history and reflect on the success ( lack of ) and longevity of popularist Nationalism, as I said educate yourself.

Well let's hope you've at last seen the Light and will now be voting Brexit or UKIP.

Posted
2 hours ago, SheungWan said:

Trying to whitewash whoever is the latest far-right hero is such hard work. Often ends up breaking the law as their party trick to generate showtime and the supporters line up accordingly. Legal niceties haven't historically been the strongest card for those floating around the neo-fascist fringes.

Sent from my SM-N935F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

 

 Is that why Christina Lagarde the Director General of the IMF was put on trial and found guilty in a case regarding corruption, yet the court decided not to sentence her. Or did they decide to be Very lenient with her, so that she could be nominated by the European council to become the President of the European Central Bank.

Posted
40 minutes ago, OtinPattaya said:

the Muslims aren't the enemies of America. They are not. 

They soon were after 9/11.

Posted
1 hour ago, petemoss said:

 

 

Happy now?

 

If someone staunchly defends a racist it's a fair assumption that they are racists themselves.

 

Interesting that the staunchest Brexit supporters are also Tommy Islam's supporters too.

None of the three TV quotes that you posted back up your claim that some "disgusting " TV posters defended the attack on Khaoyai .

One of the posts that you quoted that you claimed defended the attack on Khaoyoi was actually posted BEFORE  he told about the attack .

How can you realistically claim  that a poster defended the attacks when he posted BEFORE the attacks were written about ?

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, yogi100 said:

Well let's hope you've at last seen the Light and will now be voting Brexit or UKIP.

Voting Brexit....that ship has sailed and UKIP is well and truly sunk.

  • Like 2
Posted
12 minutes ago, sanemax said:

It was Nick Griffin and the BNP who were the ones to stand yup and expose the Muslim rape gangs .

Yes, everyone didnt believe them and just called them racists as well .

Tommy may have joined the BNP because they were the only people voicing their concerns about the rape gangs .<snip>

So it wasn't Tommy exposing the muslim rape gangs as you claimed earlier? " Tommy exposing Muslims pedo rape gangs "

  • Thanks 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, petemoss said:

A wider audience than the BBC and almost every national newspaper? All Mr Islam did was cloud the issue by claiming that all Moslems are the same and should be thrown out of the country, or "sent back to where they came from" as he likes to put it, even though the majority were born and bred in the UK.

 

 I don't beleive,contrary to what you state,that T.R. Has actually said that All Muslims should be thrown out of the Country. So perhaps you can prove yourself correct,by posting such a link.

  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, stevenl said:

So it wasn't Tommy exposing the muslim rape gangs as you claimed earlier? " Tommy exposing Muslims pedo rape gangs "

Lets not get down to the basics  , I dont have the time to keep repeating myself and explaining 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, stevenl said:

555.

 

So thanks, you did say that but are retracting now. Wise, because he has contributed nothing, nothing at all, in getting these gangs of the street.

OK. Lets talk slowly .

It was the BNP who first voiced their concerns about the Muslim rape gangs about 15-20 years ago , as I recall .

Those claims were dismissed as being baseless racist claims .

Tommy joined the BNP and the BNP continued to make the claims .

Comprende vous ?

  • Confused 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, sanemax said:

OK. Lets talk slowly .

It was the BNP who first voiced their concerns about the Muslim rape gangs about 15-20 years ago , as I recall .

Those claims were dismissed as being baseless racist claims .

Tommy joined the BNP and the BNP continued to make the claims .

Comprende vous ?

Yes, very clear. It was not Tommy exposing those gangs.

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:

This thread has been a real eye opener for me. Personally I just can't see how somebody can consider mortgage fraud and football loutism being worse than the orchestrated and racially targeted gang rape of an unknown number(acknowledged to be up to 1 million) of white and sheik kids in Britain. I would liken it to comparing a stubbed toe with stage 4 terminal brain cancer. 

 But the thread has gone a long way to explaining why the gang rapers were not tackled and arrested, and why they were allowed to continue unimpeded for decades. In fact, reading this thread and disgraceful lies told about Mr Robinson in an attempt to smear him and excuse the rapers of responsibility, I consider it very lucky indeed that some gang rapers have been arrested at all.

And also the "mortgage fraud" wasnt really fraud at all  , it was the authorities trying to silence Tommy by jailing him on trumped up charges   .

His offence is no different to a poster here on TV informing another poster about Visa agencies that can get retirement visas without the required documents  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:

This thread has been a real eye opener for me. Personally I just can't see how somebody can consider mortgage fraud and football loutism being worse than the orchestrated and racially targeted gang rape of an unknown number(acknowledged to be up to 1 million) of white and sheik kids in Britain. I would liken it to comparing a stubbed toe with stage 4 terminal brain cancer. 

 But the thread has gone a long way to explaining why the gang rapers were not tackled and arrested, and why they were allowed to continue unimpeded for decades. In fact, reading this thread and disgraceful lies told about Mr Robinson in an attempt to smear him and excuse the rapers of responsibility, I consider it very lucky indeed that some gang rapers have been arrested at all.

Why are you deliberately misrepresenting facts and opinions of other posters?

 

And yes, IMO people defending Yaxley-Lennon are racists.

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, sanemax said:

Not very good racists though , as many of those "racists" have Wifes/Children that are a different race to them .

How can you explain that ?

Give it a go .

"Racist" , people who dislike other races.................................married to someone of a different race hhhhmmmmm 

https://www.theroot.com/the-definitive-list-of-get-out-of-racism-free-cards-1832973113

 

And there are many, many more.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...