Always been a lame question. Chalk and Cheese. Beatles a unique and fantastic phenomena. No significant influence subsequent pop music. Stones were the original punks, many genre took off from there. Always been a lame question. Beatles a unique and fantastic phenomena. No significant influence subsequent pop music. Both derivative of OUR African American music tradition. Who ended up gettin’ paid? I’d say Stones. They were the original punks, many genre took off from there. Stones still have SOME kind of relevance. McCartney has not released a decent song since 1973. Lennon and Harrison gone, Ringo a crap drummer who got lucky.

 

 

 

 

On 8/8/2019 at 5:07 PM, possum1931 said:

Hendrix was all gadgets while Clapton really could play. Back in the nineties I used to go out with Claptons bass player Jack Bruces niece, she was 20 years younger than me.

Nowt like a bit of name dropping. Oh, what was her name?

On 8/8/2019 at 6:01 PM, possum1931 said:

Haven't you ever listened to Peltin Elton?

I take it you have not watched Rocketman then!

4 hours ago, wgdanson said:

Nowt like a bit of name dropping. Oh, what was her name?

Judi Bruce.

4 hours ago, wgdanson said:

I take it you have not watched Rocketman then!

Who?

Queen. Oh, that was not to choose. Then The Beatles.

Useless thread without a poll.

I could probably put on a Beatles tune for every mood I am in - Can't do the same with old gobby Jagger 

I asked an old chap in our Local if he liked The Beatles . Bloody Love em Lad , and then started making a Hunting Horn sound. He thought i said Beagles . Never heard of The Beatles.!.[emoji86][emoji252]


Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect

Beatles (that Jagger bloke is an alien for sure) though the pair of them are overrated, overly nostalgic baby-boomer bands at the end of the day. Bring rich sound like Pink Floyd (a non-overrated baby boomer band) into the equation and we'll talk. 

Stones all day long.

9 hours ago, possum1931 said:

Who?

The movie/biopic of Elton John. Really good, better than Bo Rhap in my opinion, for what that's worth.

2 minutes ago, wgdanson said:

The movie/biopic of Elton John. Really good, better than Bo Rhap in my opinion, for what that's worth.

Give me Elvis, Roy Orbison, George Jones, Vince Gill. Unlike Peltin Elton, these people have or had great singing voices.

What is Bo Rhap? I thought you used to be a professional musician.

record  sales  tell  you  the  answer  we  already know,  Stones............were crap!

Just now, gunderhill said:

record  sales  tell  you  the  answer  we  already know,  Stones............were crap!

Why do you say that...?

2 minutes ago, transam said:

Why do you say that...?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_music_artists

2 minutes ago, gunderhill said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_music_artists

I asked why you thought the Stones were crap, you know, the group that after over 50 years can still fill a stadium anywhere..

10 minutes ago, transam said:

I asked why you thought the Stones were crap, you know, the group that after over 50 years can still fill a stadium anywhere..

Theres  no accounting for "lack of taste"

https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/features/the-10-most-covered-songs-1052165.html

Edited August 10, 20196 yr by gunderhill

1 minute ago, gunderhill said:

Theres  no accounting for "lack of taste"

Daft reply....????

34 minutes ago, possum1931 said:

Give me Elvis, Roy Orbison, George Jones, Vince Gill. Unlike Peltin Elton, these people have or had great singing voices.

What is Bo Rhap? I thought you used to be a professional musician.

Yes Possum, you thought quite rightly.

 

Sorry but Bo Rap is the modern kids talk for Bohemian Rhapsody, the bio-pic of Queen.

 

 

4 minutes ago, wgdanson said:

Yes Possum, you thought quite rightly.

 

Sorry but Bo Rap is the modern kids talk for Bohemian Rhapsody, the bio-pic of Queen.

 

 

Queen? I am not saying they were not good musicians, but just not for me.

4 minutes ago, possum1931 said:

Queen? I am not saying they were not good musicians, but just not for me.

As obviously Elton John isn't either. Do you like any gay artists?

But the fact that some people like The Beatles and others The Stones, or Blur vs Oasis, or Beethoven vs Mozart or The Shadows vs The Ventures ( lol )  is what make this world a wonderful place.

Remember, one man's meat is another man's poison.

Edited August 10, 20196 yr by wgdanson

5 minutes ago, wgdanson said:

As obviously Elton John isn't either. Do you like any gay artists?

But the fact that some people like The Beatles and others The Stones, or Blur vs Oasis, or Beethoven vs Mozart or The Shadows vs The Ventures ( lol )  is what make this world a wonderful place.

Remember, one man's meat is another man's poison.

Yes. I do not like jazz, but I do appreciate the musical ability of jazz musicians, most of my time as a professional musician was playing American country music.

What often has amazed me over the years is how you can listen to a song and dislike it instantly, then, hear the same song, re-arranged, or performed by another artist/style and it's good.

The beauty of music is it's diversity, and we all have different tastes. Just because we don't like a style or musician or group performance doesn't make them "crap" it's just just not to your taste, it doesn't detract from their ability to sell millions of records and attract a huge following and audience.

Just remember your opinion is just that "yours"! ????

Rolling Stones. No question.

 

The Beatles are the most overrated bubblegum band of all time.

 

(For the record, Bruce Springsteen is the most overrated rock soloist of all time).

On 8/8/2019 at 5:18 PM, possum1931 said:

At least Mull of Kintyre had a very good melody. How many Stones songs had a good melody?

Walking Orders, you obviously do not have an ear for music. ????

1 hour ago, CharlieH said:

What often has amazed me over the years is how you can listen to a song and dislike it instantly, then, hear the same song, re-arranged, or performed by another artist/style and it's good.

The beauty of music is it's diversity, and we all have different tastes. Just because we don't like a style or musician or group performance doesn't make them "crap" it's just just not to your taste, it doesn't detract from their ability to sell millions of records and attract a huge following and audience.

Just remember your opinion is just that "yours"! ????

Record sales dont  lie..........the question is who was  better, its  been answered by record  sales, on top of that  the "covers" of both bands, Beatles way ahead in both respects.

5 hours ago, possum1931 said:

Give me Elvis, Roy Orbison, George Jones, Vince Gill. Unlike Peltin Elton, these people have or had great singing voices.

What is Bo Rhap? I thought you used to be a professional musician.

Ronald Wycherley was pretty good too! As was Noel Engel.

Edited August 10, 20196 yr by wgdanson

Only 2 that makes me want to put a brick through the screen is Geldof and Bono.!.[emoji233][emoji233]


Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect

the stones were easier to play when in a garage band in 1963...and so it came to pass that the stones were cool and the beatles were puss...