Jump to content

Trump presses U.S. companies to close China operations


rooster59

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Berkshire said:

What if other countries didn't want to do business with the USA because of our dictator?

So true. Luckily, this or any dictator can only last 4, or in the worst case 8 years. That is, unless that dictator can successfully warp the democratic process so that it takes many years to repair it. At this point, he has done significant damage, but it is repairable. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, candide said:

Very interesting article. Thank you for linking it. It has to be balanced by the respective ideological ability of US and Chinese governments to mobilise public opinion. The Chinese public opinion is very well conditioned to endure economic hardship in the name of nationalism, as a 'victim' of the imperialism of the 'bad' USA.

 

I tend to agree with you.

 

We hear all the anti-Trump rhetoric about how stupid he is, but we don't hear the same about the Chinese. What do people think about the Chinese stance? With the Chinese exporting 3 times more goods to the US that the US does to China, and China needing a lot of food products...do the US really need more iPhones?

 

But I also believe the Chinese older generation have endured, and can endure a lot more than your spoiled and whiny American and they have the free speech means to voice it...not so much the Chinese.

 

This is the trade war that needed to happen a long time ago.

 

Personally, I am enjoying the political battle. I really don't know how it will play out and who will surrender first.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, keemapoot said:

So true. Luckily, this or any dictator can only last 4, or in the worst case 8 years. That is, unless that dictator can successfully warp the democratic process so that it takes many years to repair it. At this point, he has done significant damage, but it is repairable. 

What "significant damage" has Trump done?

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/24/2019 at 7:49 AM, Berkshire said:

Trump is losing what's left of his mind.  Yet, his brainwashed supporters will still try to defend the indefensible.  Does Trump understand the free market and capitalism? 

Is his supporters "brainwash" any different from his critics and opponents "brainwash"? Such terms are meaningless and is "indefensible" as well. Can you see how senseless all this rhetoric is?

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Guitarzan said:

It's about time Trump started acting like a dictator! Democracy is over rated!  

Democracy is not perfect. When a vote by a uni professor equals to a vote by a plumber you get things like Trump and Brexit. The voting system needs retrofitting.

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, zydeco said:

That picture looks like America, Japan, and Asia on one side and Eurosclerosis on the other.

Looks to me from body language that Merkel is giving Trump an earful and he doesn't like it. Reminds me of the scene in the film Downfall where one general is telling Hitler that Steiner couldn't attack the Russians due to a lack of manpower, all the other generals agreed but didn't dare say anything.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, gearbox said:

Democracy is not perfect. When a vote by a uni professor equals to a vote by a plumber you get things like Trump and Brexit. The voting system needs retrofitting.

Are you able to give us an outline of how you would change things?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/24/2019 at 10:22 AM, pegman said:

The Americans obviously can't compete with China, which just proves they have an inferior economic system. 

Not at all. You need to read up on something called Comparative Advantage. This is why manufacturers fled the USA and why they won't be coming back.

It's also why the USA has high technology and innovative companies.

Edited by Joe Mcseismic
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DLock said:

Why should a Uni professor vote be any more important that a Plumbers vote?

The nations always depended on people with high education level to give them upper hand in trade and weaponry. The backbone of every successful nation are people with high level of education, and if these are of good character, they would definitely have a better look about how a nation should move forward. Think about it as a shareholding company - if the company is more dependent on a person to produce better result, the person either gets bigger pay or stock options (voting rights).

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DLock said:

What "significant damage" has Trump done?

 

The last "significant damage" - among hundreds - is the trade war.

 

 

@Berkshire, here it's confirmed what you have said:

Trump is losing what's left of his mind.  Yet, his brainwashed supporters will still try to defend the indefensible.  Does Trump understand the free market and capitalism?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, gearbox said:

The nations always depended on people with high education level to give them upper hand in trade and weaponry. The backbone of every successful nation are people with high level of education, and if these are of good character, they would definitely have a better look about how a nation should move forward. Think about it as a shareholding company - if the company is more dependent on a person to produce better result, the person either gets bigger pay or stock options (voting rights).

You argument of course has merit.

 

Political decisions are important, and allowing incompetent, uneducated and ignorant people to vote based on someone's appearance or because they are a woman or because they hate the other candidate or because of "herd mentality" is a poor vote.

 

The challenge of setting up an epistocracy and allowing more knowledgeable people to define political direction is the challenge of defining that political "competence" or political knowledge, as well as ensuring no demographic has more representation (i.e. white males).

 

This is a big topic, and happy to debate it out.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Guitarzan said:

So you are equating the Chinese authoritarian communist party with the USA? Nice!

 Other countries have a choice, and so do we. The truth is most other countries can't afford NOT to do business with the USA. China has no oil, the USA is the largest exporter of oil in the world, just to put it into perspective.

 

Wake me up when "our dictator" starts lining up his opposition and holds public executions, raids CNN, MSNBC, and throws Wolf Blitzer and Rachal Madcow in the gulag. Your hallucinations of Trump being a dictator don't quite gel with reality, and is insulting to people who actually have lived, and presently live under true tyrants, and communist dictators. 

"China has no oil, the USA is the largest exporter of oil in the world, just to put it into perspective."

Your perspective is wrong, USA ranks 8th, see http://www.worldstopexports.com/worlds-top-oil-exports-country/.

 

"So you are equating the Chinese authoritarian communist party with the USA?"

No, that is not what was said.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, gearbox said:

As a crude attempt, 1 vote by a voter with lower than batchelor degree = 0.75 votes of batchelor degree or higher. Deduct extra from welfare recipients, otherwise they vote to redistribute someone else's money. Perversely the China's social credit system is somewhat a good tool to do vote weighting, however it is irrelevant there. 

 

Populism is a threat to democracy, as uneducated voters can be manipulated. Promise to the voters that they can get away with theft, or get something for nothing, and see yourself elected.

 

Then Trump never would have been chosen - following your theory.

It's proven that the REPs have a lower IQ than the DEMs, on average. Even Trump himself would have been below the level of "educated" candidates for this job, therefore not electable. :cheesy:

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The USA, China, and Russia all have very large military. There are some educated

people in these organizations, however there are also a lot of general members

who are just order followers, or the blue collar types. This is the same in the

civilian part of the countries as well. Some educated, and lots of blue collar

people. I do not have much trust in the educated and rich people in any country

including Canada, so I do not have much hope for the future. The best I can hope for

is for a better PM for Canada, and for better relations for the US, China and Russia, but

I think the recession is coming soon to both the USA, Canada, as well as other

countries. Hey Greece, do you still have free medical coverage, and rich doctors, and

are you ever going to get out of debt?  I just hope some positive things come out

of this latest G7 party.

Geezer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, puck2 said:

Then Trump never would have been chosen - following your theory.

It's proven that the REPs have a lower IQ than the DEMs, on average. Even Trump himself would have been below the level of "educated" candidates for this job, therefore not electable. :cheesy:

 

I estimate his IQ to be around 90-95. Remember what his college professors said about him? And though he managed to pass the bachelors program, he could not get into the MBA program, as he just did not have the brain power to do so. So he quit after the bachelors degree. If you think about it, this puts him at a disadvantage with nearly any European or Asian leader he negotiates with. In the case of guys like XI, the disadvantage is probably in the neighborhood of 80 IQ points. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, stevenl said:

"China has no oil, the USA is the largest exporter of oil in the world, just to put it into perspective."

Your perspective is wrong, USA ranks 8th, see http://www.worldstopexports.com/worlds-top-oil-exports-country/.

 

"So you are equating the Chinese authoritarian communist party with the USA?"

No, that is not what was said.

I stand corrected, the US is the largest producer of oil in the world.

In the context of this thread and since we are talking of China, and reference to dictators, safe to assume other countries = China. At least that's my take on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

I estimate his IQ to be around 90-95. Remember what his college professors said about him? And though he managed to pass the bachelors program, he could not get into the MBA program, as he just did not have the brain power to do so. So he quit after the bachelors degree. If you think about it, this puts him at a disadvantage with nearly any European or Asian leader he negotiates with. In the case of guys like XI, the disadvantage is probably in the neighborhood of 80 IQ points. 

 

One doesn't need to be super smart to lead a nation. It is also important to be of a good character, and not just to try to play the masses only to get elected. 

 

Think about this. What makes the West blue collar workers so special, what kind of skills they have to demand salaries which are times higher in China or Thailand or Vietnam? Absolutely nothing. A car can be manufactured in any of these countries with roughly the same outcome.

What makes it possible for their pay to be much higher is the education and strength of people like the Intel chip designers, which gives much better trade outcome and new product development. 

People like Trump divided their nations and created resentment within. Instead of improving the levels of education and competitiveness, they promise to bring back the low level manufacturing.  Instead of making the next generation chip designers, they are trying to make them thong makers.

 

Long term this policy is going to create even more damage. There are many more non-US multinationals with China manufacturing facilities. Why would Toyota leave China, the biggest car market? Currently a Ford manufactured anywhere cannot compete with a Toyota in terms of quality, what would happen if it costs even more when manufactured in US?   

 

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...