ivor bigun Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, stevenl said: Seems the law disagrees with you. then the law is an ass. if he actually raped the girls ,then he deserves all he got ,but lets face it ,most just went along to get a part ,didnt want to maybe ,but nobody forced them ."its life Jim,but not as we know it" how many of you have been with a bar girl and asked for it for free and she said no,so you gave her money,she didnt fancy you ,but did it for the money ,they did it for the part .think about it . Edited February 25, 2020 by ivor bigun 2 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post newatthis Posted February 25, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 25, 2020 7 minutes ago, ivor bigun said: then the law is an ass. if he actually raped the girls ,then he deserves all he got ,but lets face it ,most just went along to get a part ,didnt want to maybe ,but nobody forced them ."its life Jim,but not as we know it" "You'll get the job, if you sleep with me" or 'Don't you want the job" or any such / like phrases are coercian. And coercian is rape. The woman must truly want to have sex without any type of manipulation, even within marriage. No one has the right to someone else's body. 4 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 29 minutes ago, JustAnotherHun said: Did anyone of the Harvey-bashers follow the statements of the "raped" women? Dating Weinstein after the "rape" repeatedly? Sending him love-messages? Asking for help or a job? Yeah, sure, it was a kind of Stockholm syndrom and the earth is flat. The evidence presented to the court and how the jury consider that evidence is what matters. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JustAnotherHun Posted February 25, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 25, 2020 6 minutes ago, newatthis said: "You'll get the job, if you sleep with me" or 'Don't you want the job" or any such / like phrases are coercian. And coercian is rape. No coercion. Just say "No, thanks". "Rape" is something violent. Use Google. 3 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BritManToo Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 40 minutes ago, worgeordie said: You think I don't know that ,just saying there are a lot of coloured people in jail who also protest innocent.quite a few who are.he's far from it. He must be your hero ,judging by the other post you made. "Another travesty of justice in the land of the free." quote BritManToo regards Worgeordie So because I believe in Justice and rules of evidence, I'm a bad person? The western world hates men & worships women, which is why I don't live there. 1 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 Here’s the best bit: Rikers Island. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustAnotherHun Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 6 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: The evidence presented to the court and how the jury consider that evidence is what matters. You're right. Miscarriage of justice never ever happens - as you can see daily in Thailand. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evadgib Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 @Chomper Higgot What did you find funny about #28? In similar trials elsewhere proceedings are gagged until all outstanding charges have been dealt with, so lets hear it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 9 minutes ago, JustAnotherHun said: You're right. Miscarriage of justice never ever happens - as you can see daily in Thailand. Nothing at all to do with Thailand, where in any case rich men don’t get sent to prison. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 9 minutes ago, evadgib said: @Chomper Higgot What did you find funny about #28? In similar trials elsewhere proceedings are gagged until all outstanding charges have been dealt with, so lets hear it... This isn’t ‘elsewhere’. It’s NY, I find it funny you din’t seem to understand that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JustAnotherHun Posted February 25, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 25, 2020 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: Nothing at all to do with Thailand, where in any case rich men don’t get sent to prison. But with US, where "raped" women date the rapist continously for years, sending him love-mails and asking for free flights, help and jobs. Edited February 25, 2020 by JustAnotherHun 3 1 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evadgib Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: This isn’t ‘elsewhere’. It’s NY, I find it funny you din’t seem to understand that. So his defence team can't/won't claim that his LA trial has been prejudiced & the jury pool poisoned by media coverage? Fancy that! I'm so glad you were on hand to clear that up Edited February 25, 2020 by evadgib Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustAnotherHun Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 4 minutes ago, Victornoir said: to show others that these crimes can be punished. What crime exactly in this case? Beíng a male? Offering goodies for sex? 1 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 2 minutes ago, evadgib said: So his defence team can't/won't claim that his LA trial has been prejudiced & the jury pool poisoned by media coverage? Fancy that! They can claim whatever they wish. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Chomper Higgot Posted February 25, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 25, 2020 1 minute ago, JustAnotherHun said: What crime exactly in this case? Beíng a male? Offering goodies for sex? Is something worrying you? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InsertNameHere Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 Now what about: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustAnotherHun Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 7 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: Is something worrying you? If lacking arguments turn to ad hominem. Nice try. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evadgib Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 (edited) 21 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: They can claim whatever they wish. The people that matter will eat that if the case collapses. Edited February 25, 2020 by evadgib Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newatthis Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 38 minutes ago, JustAnotherHun said: No coercion. Just say "No, thanks". "Rape" is something violent. Use Google. This is the 21st century. Rape does not have to be violent. There doesn't have to be physical force; let alone physical injuries. Women (and men) can be raped through coercian in a manipulative, controlling relationship or by abuse of authority. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 7 minutes ago, evadgib said: You'll eat that if the case collapses. No I won’t. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 8 minutes ago, JustAnotherHun said: If lacking arguments turn to ad hominem. Nice try. I asked you a question, I did not make a personal attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post sanuk711 Posted February 25, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 25, 2020 Harvey Weinstein - Guilty of rape. . For Sale: 1 Walking Frame ......................................... 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welovesundaysatspace Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 1 hour ago, JustAnotherHun said: Did anyone of the Harvey-bashers follow the statements of the "raped" women? Dating Weinstein after the "rape" repeatedly? Sending him love-messages? Asking for help or a job? Which of the cases he was convicted for was that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evadgib Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 (edited) 22 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: No I won’t. Given the frequency by which you are wrong I prefer to wait.. + Edited February 25, 2020 by evadgib 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluespunk Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 (edited) 7 hours ago, webfact said: Weinstein never testified in his defence. Even this rapist scumbag knew you can't defend the indefensible... Edited February 25, 2020 by Bluespunk punctuation 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Orton Rd Posted February 25, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 25, 2020 59 minutes ago, JustAnotherHun said: But with US, where "raped" women date the rapist continously for years, sending him love-mails and asking for free flights, help and jobs. Blokes will have to get consent forms off women now to prevent them regretting it afterwards and crying to the cops, after they cashed the cheque of course 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4737 Carlin Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 7 hours ago, webfact said: He had denied the accusations and said any sexual encounters were consensual. This defence might have been more believable if he wasn't a fat ugly toad. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post ivor bigun Posted February 25, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 25, 2020 1 hour ago, newatthis said: "You'll get the job, if you sleep with me" or 'Don't you want the job" or any such / like phrases are coercian. And coercian is rape. The woman must truly want to have sex without any type of manipulation, even within marriage. No one has the right to someone else's body. so bar girls who think your a fat ugly barsteward and dont want to sleep with you but want the money so have to are being raped? 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post BritManToo Posted February 25, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 25, 2020 1 minute ago, ivor bigun said: so bar girls who think your a fat ugly barsteward and dont want to sleep with you but want the money so have to are being raped? I think there's a 10-20 year waiting period before they can claim rape. 2 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BritManToo Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 17 minutes ago, Orton Rd said: Blokes will have to get consent forms off women now to prevent them regretting it afterwards and crying to the cops, after they cashed the cheque of course I once attended a lecture (1974) given by a lawyer about avoiding the risk of false rape accusations in the UK. His conclusion was to be entirely safe, you would need a signed consent form witnessed by two impartial people who could attest not only to her willing consent but her mental state and sobriety at the time. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now