3 minutes ago, Crazy Alex said:

Yes, because there was a plethora of people saying Trump didn't do enough when he implemented travel restrictions on China on January 31. Oh wait a minute..

The travel restriction was one of many things that he should have done.

Just because he did one thing ........................ 

1 minute ago, sirineou said:

The travel restriction was one of many things that he should have done.

Just because he did one thing ........................ 

Exactly and even that was ultimately too late, incomplete and ineffective (and there were gaps in following U.S. citizens returning from China as well). 

3 minutes ago, sirineou said:

The travel restriction was one of many things that he should have done.

Just because he did one thing ........................ 

He did more than one thing. I was just pointing out the first major action.

1 minute ago, Jingthing said:

Exactly and even that was ultimately too late, incomplete and ineffective (and there were gaps in following U.S. citizens returning from China as well). 

Who said it was too late at the time?

Just now, Crazy Alex said:

He did more than one thing. I was just pointing out the first major action.

With all the others he was a day late and a dollar short

1 minute ago, sirineou said:

With all the others he was a day late and a dollar short

Who wasn't?

He announced the face mask directive and he added "I am not going to wear one"  Why did he say that? what value to anyone was there in saying that? What positive affect could saying something like that have?

 

9 minutes ago, Crazy Alex said:

Who wasn't?

Just because others might have being just as bad, It does not absolve the moron in the white house. This is America the wealthiest country in the world, we should not be asked to make face masks out of bandanas.  

  I was just talking to my sister in Italy on skype (20 min ago) her doorbell rung , she said it was the municipality, they delivered a N95 facemask to her, she said she already had one to them, they said that those over 65 were allocated Two!!

I am in Florida waiting for my bandana delivery. 

 

Edited April 5, 20206 yr by sirineou

On 4/3/2020 at 9:11 PM, Crazy Alex said:

On 4/2/2020 at 12:36 PM, Jingthing said:

I'm wondering if the families of the hundreds of thousands or even millions of Americans that are going to lose loved ones can sue this president for damages due to his extreme narcissism and incompetence in the first few months of this threat that led to the mess we're in now. Such actions would be especially apt against perhaps one of the most litigious characters in world history. Nobody is saying he is to blame for the virus existing. But he is responsible for the response. He has improved but too late to prevent massive deaths. Even now the obvious thing that should have been done a long time ago is to shut down the entire country in a consistent way from the federal level. Viruses do not respect city county and state borders. 

You should more likely wonder if these families can sue liberal Democrats. Take New York, for example. Bill Di Blasio encouraged New Yorkers to celebrate Chinese New Year NINE DAYS after the Trump administration declared a national health emergency. As late as March 13, Bill Di Blasio told New Yorkers to go to a bar and have drinks.

 

Your problem is, you're limiting where you get your news. And it shows. And believe me, I have the Google to keep hammering this issue. Do you feel lucky, ****? Well, do you?

Jing is a sounding board for the morons that call themselves Democrats. We hear this nonsense every day on CNN and friends.

 

Trump restricted air travel from China, only 3 days after Italy, on Feb 2, 3 days before he was acquitted on Feb 5. 

 

Everyone is an expert in hindsight. Trump is not a scientist. He's gets his information from the top of their fields. If they cannot provide the best information, no one can (other than your resident armchair experts like JT that is).

28 minutes ago, sirineou said:

The travel restriction was one of many things that he should have done.

Just because he did one thing ........................ 

 

I know you are bitter because your portfolio has turned to dust.

My sympathies of course but no reason to keep up the orange man bad

rant.

Edited April 5, 20206 yr by JHolmesJr

Does it take Australians to point out the obvious problems with Biden. He's years past being fit and this is not an insult, but pointing out the obvious. It's a crime that the Democrats are pushing this guy so hard. He wouldn't last 3 months as president.

 

 

3 minutes ago, JHolmesJr said:

 

I know you are bitter because your portfolio has turned to dust.

My sympathies of course but no reason to keep up the orange man bad

rant.

Not everything is about money

Money is one thing, My life and the life of my family and friends is another.  

15 minutes ago, tropo said:

Does it take Australians to point out the obvious problems with Biden. He's years past being fit and this is not an insult, but pointing out the obvious. It's a crime that the Democrats are pushing this guy so hard. He wouldn't last 3 months as president.

 

 

Wow, a junior newscorp hack trying to impress Rupert while he bunkers down in oz. 

 

You must be one of the 20 people who watch that show. 

6 minutes ago, sirineou said:

Not everything is about money

Money is one thing, My life and the life of my family and friends is another.  

Sure, not everything is about money if you have it. I'd like to see your fantastic family life if you're totally broke. No place to live, no money for food... begging for help.

43 minutes ago, Crazy Alex said:

Who wasn't?

When you get pulled over by the BIB and they tell you you were speeding  is that what you tell them? "Who wasn't"

And if you do, how is it working out for you?

Just now, samran said:

Wow, a junior newscorp hack trying to impress Rupert while he bunkers down in oz. 

 

You must be one of the 20 people who watch that show. 

Do you have your head buried deep in sand? The video has been watched over 1/2 million times, but never mind the show, watch the video evidence. I'll take back my previous prediction. He won't last a month in office.

1 hour ago, JHolmesJr said:

 

wow going back to 2013....looks like you have found your passion during the lockdown.

There's nothing wrong with Trump's quote btw....he isn't responsible for the virus coming

to the US....he isn't responsible for it spreading due to dumbass behaviour of people.

 

He is responsible for doing everything possible to fight it and help the economy recover.

And he is doing that tirelessly. There is high approval of the way he is handling this crisis.

 

That is true but it isn't saying much. We all know people would rally behind a chimp when they are scared. In fact, I think that has already actually happened. 

25 minutes ago, tropo said:

Sure, not everything is about money if you have it. I'd like to see your fantastic family life if you're totally broke. No place to live, no money for food... begging for help.

Why would you like that?

9 minutes ago, sirineou said:

Why would you like that?

Lost for words?  

Edited April 5, 20206 yr by tropo

16 minutes ago, tropo said:

Stop side tracking by trying to attack the messengers. Watch the video evidence, which is freely available online from multiple sources. He's just not (physically) fit to be president. Take your head out of the sand.

 

 

When the messenger is a self professed right wing talk show hosted by the fringe of Australian journalism, then yeah I do question whatever the serve up. 

1 minute ago, samran said:

When the messenger is a self professed right wing talk show hosted by the fringe of Australian journalism, then yeah I do question whatever the serve up. 

You're showing clearly that you want to deny the video evidence by continuing to attack the source. The source, all of it, is from the US media. Sky News Australia just packaged it. As I said, don't watch it if you don't want to, but the evidence is clear... and it won't be getting any better in the next 7 months. Would you like me to find some videos of Democrats talking about it?

5 minutes ago, tropo said:

You're showing clearly that you want to deny the video evidence by continuing to attack the source. The source, all of it, is from the US media. Sky News Australia just packaged it. As I said, don't watch it if you don't want to, but the evidence is clear... and it won't be getting any better in the next 7 months. Would you like me to find some videos of Democrats talking about it?

Knock yourself out...

11 minutes ago, samran said:

Knock yourself out...

Yes, trying to convince you of the obvious is like bashing my head against a brick wall, or the computer. LOL. I'm done. 

If democrats can't beat the worst president in American history they may as disband the party. 

 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/04/05/worst-president-ever/

 

 

Assuming there is such a control of course.

Who is deciding, in the U.S.A., if  someone is fit ( mentally, physically) to be able to be candidate for the highest position in the country? 

Is that experts in the field from the party of the candidate? 

Or are there independent experts? 

 

 

 

47 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

If democrats can't beat the worst president in American history they may as disband the party. 

 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/04/05/worst-president-ever/

 

 

Regardless of whether the Democrats can beat Trump, they should disband. The Democrat party has become a complete joke. If I told rational Americans Nancy Pelosi would be the voice of reason in the party five years ago, I would have been laughed out of any room. No, Nancy hasn't changed. The party has moved so far left, it's pathetic.

 

Now the SS (Socialist squad), consisting of the most vile anti-American filth, who come across as caricatures of loser anti-American, anti-Christian, anti-capitalist leftists, now pushing the party further left. But not as cartoon characters, as elected officials! Imagine a socialist bartender proposing a $90-something trillion dollar take down of the US as a country, to include getting rid of cows and airplanes, being taken seriously in the US House of Representatives.

 

And look at this year's crop of losers. Every single one of them raised their hands to support giving free health care to any worthless sack of flesh who can manage to drag their carcass onto American soil. Democrats have literally evolved to where they now prefer illegal aliens and special rights for said illegal aliens over US citizens!

 

And leading the pack? Two old white men. One, a buffoon who's never had a real job in his life, honeymooned in the Soviet Union, thinks people lining up for food is good. Then the other- a lifetime political hack, never been right about anything in his life, couldn't register a blip the multiple times he ran for president before, in the pocket of banksters, getting more senile every day- as the top guy! Yes, seriously!

 

Worst president ever? Ha! Try worst PARTY ever. And there's no relief in sight. We are literally dealing with a party whose base responds most to free stuff, shops around for a place to live based on where they can get the biggest welfare subsidies, and has has been spoiled more than any other generation in US history.

46 minutes ago, luckyluke said:

Assuming there is such a control of course.

Who is deciding, in the U.S.A., if  someone is fit ( mentally, physically) to be able to be candidate for the highest position in the country? 

Is that experts in the field from the party of the candidate? 

Or are there independent experts? 

 

 

 

There is no formal process for that. Basically the voters decide based on limited information. There is Article 25 for a sitting and tweeting president but that doesn't work if the unfit president is surrounded by yes men toadies.

1 hour ago, Jingthing said:

If democrats can't beat the worst president in American history they may as disband the party. 

 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/04/05/worst-president-ever/

 

 

 

What does it say about the Democrats that with a least half a dozen better candidates who ran for the nomination that they are force feeding us a candidate that is (perhaps) only marginally less worse than the worst president in history? Both parties ought to be disbanded, franky. I don't think it matters which one goes first.

3 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

There is no formal process for that. Basically the voters decide based on limited information. There is Article 25 for a sitting and tweeting president but that doesn't work if the unfit president is surrounded by yes men toadies.

Really? Tell me more about this "article 25". Hint: there's no such thing. Therein lies part of the problem. You are clinging at some straw man that doesn't even exist! And what is this additional nonsense about "for a sitting and tweeting president"? Is this also covered by this mysterious "article 25"?

 

Wow. Just WOW.

1 minute ago, lannarebirth said:

 

What does it say about the Democrats that with a least half a dozen better candidates who ran for the nomination that they are force feeding us a candidate that is (perhaps) only marginally less worse than the worst president in history? Both parties ought to be disbanded, franky. I don't think it matters which one goes first.

You know.... imagine what the political hacks of both parties would do to an industry if that industry was controlled by two corporations as pathetic as our two parties. I say they'd be screaming from every roof top to dismantle such a duopoly and would have those two corporations blasted into bits in short order.