21 minutes ago, Logosone said:

Of course, the virtue signalling will be in overdrive. 

 

You can bet your last Baht that in private they'll be worse than any of us ever will be.

 

Despite the vigorous moral grunting.

 

Scurrilous and baseless accusation.

I remember the days when  I used to get excited by a glimpse of stocking ….. well I used to remember !

3 hours ago, Logosone said:

The last thing we need is to spend valuable lawmaker time during a pandemic and millions of dollars, pounds and euro on trying to outlaw boom-boom pictures from women who decided to be photographed during fornication.

 

To say a photo like that is just as serious as actual sexual assault is the most stupid statement I've seen on here for quite some time.

It's the publishing of the photo that is serious.  The photos are almost invariably taken on the understanding that it's between two consenting adults.   Consent of one of the adults is not generally present when it's published.   

 

As as for millions of dollars and the timing, it's just a matter of enacting a law.  It would involve a working party but seems a no brainer.    Hope you don't have daughters who unwittingly end up on the net for the sexual gratification of strangers.

Victim blaming is strong in this thread.

1 hour ago, car720 said:

Damn.  It is hard enough for me to remember the million discretions I commited yesterday.  

LOL! Made me laugh. Thanks for that Squire.

1 hour ago, Mick501 said:

It's the publishing of the photo that is serious.  The photos are almost invariably taken on the understanding that it's between two consenting adults.   Consent of one of the adults is not generally present when it's published.   

 

As as for millions of dollars and the timing, it's just a matter of enacting a law.  It would involve a working party but seems a no brainer.    Hope you don't have daughters who unwittingly end up on the net for the sexual gratification of strangers.

 

No, actually it's not serious. It's a photo. It's not sexual assault. It's not murder. It's not a virus. How is a photo of a naked woman ever serious? This is 2020, not 1812.

 

Just a matter of enacting a law? Lawmakers have considerably more important matters to attend to that actual matter to society at large, as opposed to a small number of ladies who've had pictures of themselves taken during sexual activity. It would divert much taxpayer money away on some wholly unimportant nonsense.

 

This is a non-issue.

 

I have daughters, and if ever pics went up I wouldn't consider it serious in the slightest, except of course that my daugthers would never be so stupid to let some bloke take sex pictures of themselves and then complain when it goes on the internet.

Edited May 6, 20206 yr by Logosone

1 hour ago, Logosone said:

 

No, actually it's not serious. It's a photo. It's not sexual assault. It's not murder. It's not a virus. How is a photo of a naked woman ever serious? This is 2020, not 1812.

 

Just a matter of enacting a law? Lawmakers have considerably more important matters to attend to that actual matter to society at large, as opposed to a small number of ladies who've had pictures of themselves taken during sexual activity. It would divert much taxpayer money away on some wholly unimportant nonsense.

 

This is a non-issue.

 

I have daughters, and if ever pics went up I wouldn't consider it serious in the slightest, except of course that my daugthers would never be so stupid to let some bloke take sex pictures of themselves and then complain when it goes on the internet.

Clearly significantly smarter than their dad.

3 hours ago, Mick501 said:

Clearly significantly smarter than their dad.

True my sex pictures are all over pornhub to my eternal shame.

 

I was young and stupid.

1 hour ago, Logosone said:

True my sex pictures are all over pornhub to my eternal shame.

 

I was young and stupid.

Good to know at least one of those things appears to have changed with time.

On 5/6/2020 at 10:02 AM, Crazy Alex said:

Look people, it's horrible if someone takes photos and/or video and makes it public. But if in this day and age, you let someone take photos and/or video of you in compromising positions, you are quite simply a fool unless you yourself have complete control of the digital files in question.

One has to question the sanity of anyone that allows intimate photos of themselves to be accessible to another these days, and in many cases it's the person being embarrassed that sent the photos over the internet, though they thought they were not public. Once something is on the net it's just a matter of time before someone posts them in public.

We are constantly being told how tech savvy young people are, but I have to doubt that.