4 minutes ago, Rookiescot said:

You are justifying this? 

Unbelievable. 

I am quite sure that it isnt true and that no one was attacked whilst having a picnic in the park 

1 minute ago, Bluespunk said:

That's an idiot setting fire to a flag, it's not BLM attacking London.

 

He was part of a large group that went on the rampage in London , it was on the news last week

2 minutes ago, CorpusChristie said:

I am quite sure that it isnt true and that no one was attacked whilst having a picnic in the park 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-2191260/Video-Picnic-interrupted-Hyde-Park-far-right-demonstrators.html

 

Sure about that are you?

1 hour ago, twocatsmac said:

“A far-right protester” ?

Great use of language by the “ far left media” 

 

and a great photo opportunity by the “far left police” who are famous for not doing their job properly these last few weeks.

Well we are living in an age where being slightly left of Ghengis Khan gets you branded a socialist but the flag wavers and chest thumpers. 

11 minutes ago, CorpusChristie said:

He was part of a large group that went on the rampage in London , it was on the news last week

I watched the news and didn't see any rampage or attack on London.

 

There was some acts of idiocy, but nothing like the violence exhibited by those 'defending rights of statues' yesterday  

Edited June 14, 20206 yr by Bluespunk

1 hour ago, TopDeadSenter said:

In laymans terms, a man that does not want to surrender British culture and history to a revisionist leftist mob. Nice of the police to finally spring into action, although I did not see scenes of mass looting like when the BLM were "protesting". Wonder why the patriotic pro-statue crowd deserved a beat down?

In layman’s terms, a man of colour showing a thug compassion he’d never think to show if the tables were turned. 

8 minutes ago, Rookiescot said:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-2191260/Video-Picnic-interrupted-Hyde-Park-far-right-demonstrators.html

 

Sure about that are you?

Dont think they were having a picnic , most probably Ant theethers 

call in the army, disperse these thug vandals with force if need be. 

1 minute ago, CorpusChristie said:

Dont think they were having a picnic , most probably Ant theethers 

Yeah and the mob attacking them were who then?

Right wing thugs were running riot in London yesterday attacking people at random and also attacking the police.

11 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

I watched the news and didn't see any rampage or attack on London.

 

There was some acts of idiocy, but nothing like the violence exhibited by those 'defending rights of statues' yesterday  

Last weekend, 49 Police officers got injured in London by the BLM group and there was property destruction and they were expected to do the same yesterday 

2 minutes ago, CorpusChristie said:

Last weekend, 49 Police officers got injured in London by the BLM group and there was property destruction and they were expected to do the same yesterday 

Totally unpatriotic.

 

They should be doing their violence and vandalism like true Englishman  - after a football match. 

First it was Brexit , then it was Markle , then it was Covid 19 and now BLM.

 

What tasty morsels will the tabloids be dishing up in a few weeks time. Whatever it is it will be flogged to death just as long as the sheeple find titillation in it.

 

A couple of weeks ago nobody gave a toss about statues and memorials. If some of them are in bad taste they have been in bad taste since they were erected but nobody noticed or was affronted by them.

 

What revolts me is how the sheeple are so easily manipulated by the tabloids ,  social networks , peer pressure and the overweening desire to be famous and garner as many likes and subscribers as possible..

 

Dreadful.

25 minutes ago, CorpusChristie said:

 

Attacking a London war memorial 

The police should track that guy down and charge him to the fullest extent. 

 

Unbelievable that they let these BLM run riot. The police need to restore law & order.

16 minutes ago, CorpusChristie said:

Last weekend, 49 Police officers got injured in London by the BLM group and there was property destruction and they were expected to do the same yesterday 

As I said there were acts of idiocy, nothing compared to yesterdays thuggery mind, but it was not an 'attack' on London.

 

Protests were expected yesterday, not an attack. However the BLM, to prevent violence threatened by those claiming they were coming to 'defend statues', called it off.

 

The right did not and when found could not do as they wished, launched attacks on police

 

Go figure eh...

Edited June 14, 20206 yr by Bluespunk

14 minutes ago, steven100 said:

Unbelievable that they let these BLM run riot. The police need to restore law & order.

You might want to catch up, it was right wing thugs who caused yesterday's violence.

2 hours ago, stevenl said:

In layman's terms, a far right protester. Hence the description in the article.

Comical - yet another one played by the press

2 hours ago, INFIDELandPROUD said:

So let me get this straight, if you protect any statue from damage (most of these people being military veterans) you're automatically classed as ’Far-Right’ absolutely ridiculous journalism trying to dupe people into more hatred.

That's why so many people are cancelling their BBC TV licence and a movement called 'defund the BBC' has begun, people are sick to death of the BBCs propaganda, the news readers are not impartial any more.

29 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

As I said there were acts of idiocy, nothing compared to yesterdays thuggery mind, but it was not an 'attack' on London.

 

Protests were expected yesterday, not an attack. However the BLM, to prevent violence threatened by those claiming they were coming to 'defend statues', called it off.

 

The right did not and when found could not do as they wished, launched attacks on police

 

Go figure eh...

Men defending Churchill's statue from literally nobody while giving nazi salutes and attacking police officers - you couldn't make it up. 

7 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

Men defending Churchill's statue from literally nobody while giving nazi salutes and attacking police officers - you couldn't make it up. 

This guy was as bad.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jun/13/man-urinates-next-to-pc-keith-palmer-memorial-during-far-right-protest?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Edited June 14, 20206 yr by Bluespunk

10 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

Men defending Churchill's statue from literally nobody while giving nazi salutes and attacking police officers - you couldn't make it up. 

Somebody probably did make that up

2 hours ago, robblok said:

Of course not they are allowed to protest too, but they should be sensible about it and make sure the protests are not in close proximity. Its only stupid to do such and will lead to violence. By doing so they clearly show me they are out for violence. I have seen the same thing in my country when there is a protest for something. Then you got a group who is against those protests showing up causing trouble and making sure violence is started.

 

If you don't agree have your own protests but not at the same site. How hard is that.

 

We had the same with soccer fans, some would celebrate a victory and then the other side started to come to disturb it and cause violence. Just shows that they are out for violence and dont care about protests.

The YouTube live feed from Central London yesterday showed antagonism and active provocation by both sides. There were several co-ordinated surges against the two dozen or so "far right" (and deceptively rather ordinary looking) agitators who had the barefaced cheek to stand around the plinth of Nelson's column. One of the BLM demonstrators distinguished herself by repeatedly shrieking "f#ck#ng Judas" at them, presumably annoyed at having invested in some fluorescent spray paint, (to match her hair) and then being prevented by these fascists from using it to enhance the plinth of the column. 

 

There were some very unsavoury characters amongst the "far right", but by no means all (or most) of them were the stereotypical drunken thugs we are led to believe comprised their ranks. 

 

As people who did not wish for the monuments of their capital city to be defaced (or worse) they had every right to be present at those monuments, certainly as much right as those who showed (by their actions last weekend) an intent to damage them.

 

Returning to the photograph, it is unfortunate that the police were unable to prevent that chap from  being beaten. I wonder if they were able to apprehend those who beat him? Somehow I doubt it; still, the police cameraman will no doubt have got it on video, so they will be able to show it when they release their Facebook appeal for the perpetrators to surrender themselves.

Edited June 14, 20206 yr by herfiehandbag

11 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

Men defending Churchill's statue from literally nobody while giving nazi salutes and attacking police officers - you couldn't make it up. 

"You’re either against the violence at last weeks protest AND today’s protest, or you support both. 

You can’t pick and choose."

:Emily Hewertson

1 minute ago, vogie said:

"You’re either against the violence at last weeks protest AND today’s protest, or you support both. 

You can’t pick and choose."

:Emily Hewertson

Personally, I am against it all - every last bit of it. 

Just now, RuamRudy said:

Personally, I am against it all - every last bit of it. 

With all due respects your posts do seem a tad one sided, can't remember you criticising last weeks screaming banshees..

2 hours ago, stevenl said:

In layman's terms, a far right protester. Hence the description in the article.

Must be - after all he was identified - by the "crowd"! 

1 hour ago, Denim said:

First it was Brexit , then it was Markle , then it was Covid 19 and now BLM.

 

What tasty morsels will the tabloids be dishing up in a few weeks time. Whatever it is it will be flogged to death just as long as the sheeple find titillation in it.

 

A couple of weeks ago nobody gave a toss about statues and memorials. If some of them are in bad taste they have been in bad taste since they were erected but nobody noticed or was affronted by them.

 

What revolts me is how the sheeple are so easily manipulated by the tabloids ,  social networks , peer pressure and the overweening desire to be famous and garner as many likes and subscribers as possible..

 

Dreadful.

The 6.00 am BBC lead news story today was Atlanta USA related.

UK media insist on keeping the latest riots as a runner, focusing on American issues at a time when they have an appalling pandemic record and indeed rioting issues at home. 

 

We need an asteroid to hit earth for them to change the narrative for a couple days. 

 

 

 

Edited June 14, 20206 yr by twocatsmac

52 minutes ago, steven100 said:

The police should track that guy down and charge him to the fullest extent. 

 

That isn't a bloke.

1 hour ago, Bluespunk said:

No they didn't. When did BLM "attack" London?

Last week.

11 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

Men defending Churchill's statue from literally nobody while giving nazi salutes and attacking police officers - you couldn't make it up. 

There were no nazi salutes. They are football chants , people raise both hands for certain songs