mberbae Posted July 28, 2020 Share Posted July 28, 2020 Why did Vorayuth Yoovidhya fail to answer EIGHT court summons and go on the run if he was innocent ? Why did he leave the country SO FAST ? Was it because he may have had drugs in his system ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatOngo Posted July 28, 2020 Share Posted July 28, 2020 4 hours ago, Kadilo said: Not just any old witness, but an “Air Marshall” Surely someone in that position wouldn’t tell porkies ???? The higher up the tree, the bigger the porkies, it's in the DNA! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTSIssues Posted July 28, 2020 Share Posted July 28, 2020 Unless that particular Ferrari had a paper front bumper there is no way that much damage was caused at 60kmh. hopeless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post hobz Posted July 28, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted July 28, 2020 What are the odds that TWO witnesses both saw a hit and run on a cop and decided to not say anything for 7 years 555 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wombat Posted July 28, 2020 Share Posted July 28, 2020 goodness me, isn't that bike solid to do that damage at 80kph Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Mega Posted July 28, 2020 Share Posted July 28, 2020 Bam, there it is, have always said Khun boss was innocent and the events that followed was a stitch up in the hopes of a cake box given who he is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klauskunkel Posted July 28, 2020 Share Posted July 28, 2020 I stopped reading at "(hot)air marshal" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Mega Posted July 28, 2020 Share Posted July 28, 2020 3 hours ago, Mr Meeseeks said: As I posted in another thread, the forensic investigation gave clear evidence of a rear-ended impact to the Policeman's motorcycle at 177km/h. Ive not seen pics of the bike after the incident but whats been shown of the fezza sure do not support that speed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mak25 Posted July 28, 2020 Share Posted July 28, 2020 (edited) 39 minutes ago, Jimbo53 said: And why did these 2 "Phantom Witnesses" not stay at the scene to render assistance and give statements at the time? I understand, those witnesses failed to stop to assist the accident victim. Could they now be charged instead? (By victim I mean the policeman, not the poor boy who is blamed for everything but apparently not at fault) Edited July 28, 2020 by Mak25 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bezdomny Posted July 28, 2020 Share Posted July 28, 2020 "Cop was reversing at full speed" witnesses said. Case closed. ???? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post GinBoy2 Posted July 28, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted July 28, 2020 (edited) I actually hate myself for even bothering to reply to this thread. We all knew the outcome of this years ago, it was a forgone conclusion. But to make it even more ridiculous they somehow mange to find 'witnesses' almost 8 years later, Oh Puhleeze! The country is a corrupt basket case, lying, corruption and wealth just go hand in hand. To the newbies, try not to stress too much about it, because you'll see this nonsense over and over again Edited July 28, 2020 by GinBoy2 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy one Posted July 28, 2020 Share Posted July 28, 2020 Saying the car was only doing 60 KPH is a load in itself Has anyone here ever seen a hi so obey the speed limit 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djayz Posted July 28, 2020 Share Posted July 28, 2020 19 minutes ago, Bezdomny said: "Cop was reversing at full speed" witnesses said. Case closed. ???? That's about the only thing missing in this farce. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grumpy 4680 Posted July 28, 2020 Share Posted July 28, 2020 If these alleged witnesses, saw what happened, then failed to stop, surely they should be prosecuted for failure to do so. Or are there not any Laws in Thailand to that effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post ronaldo0 Posted July 28, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted July 28, 2020 (edited) So professional accident investigators are out by over a 100kph ?? Yet two people in a pick up can tell the speed of a moving car just like that and if the Ferrari was only doing around 60/70kph and they were behind it and it passed them are you telling me they are driving down the central lane doing 40/50kph ?? If so they would have been able to brake if the cop pulled in front of them and no need to swerve to left lane ! If this fairytale was true then why did boss not respond to all the police summonses to explain and why suddenly run off on a private plane ? Hans Christian Anderson would struggle to make this up ! Edited July 28, 2020 by ronaldo0 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GroveHillWanderer Posted July 28, 2020 Share Posted July 28, 2020 4 hours ago, ThailandRyan said: It has gone Viral and now worldwide on the stage of infamy. I just got a call from a buddy in Nevada who said he was going to make a bet at one of the casinos that the case would be re-started as the Thai prosecutors failed to have the time frozen for all the charges as he had fled the country. When someone flees, the time until a charge falls off of the books is generally stopped while the warrant is active. Only then is the time restarted after either the warrant period runs out or the individual is apprehended. You generally can not outrun a case as they will refile the charge and reactivate the warrant, but then this is Thailand.... That's only the case if the legal system in question has what's known as a tolling provision allowing for the elapsed time to be 'frozen.' Thai law does not have a tolling provision, so the clock keeps on ticking no matter what the circumstances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post spidermike007 Posted July 28, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted July 28, 2020 Ever wonder why it is so much easier for super wealthy people to come up with helpful witnesses, a d expert testimony? Do they honestly think anyone, and I mean anyone, is buying this load of nonsense? This is Thailand's version of "hi-so justice". 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangkok Barry Posted July 28, 2020 Share Posted July 28, 2020 5 hours ago, thequietman said: Even if it were true, leaving the scene of an accident and not rendering assistance is a criminal offence. If he had remained, it's very likely that he would have failed a soberiety test - a crime. Driving in the far right lane at 60 kph while not overtaking- a crime. Stating that he wasn't driving the vehicle, when he was - a crime. Lying to the police - a crime. Even if totally not his fault, driving with a person trapped beneath your car causing their death - definitely a f@@k&*g crime. You tink too mutt! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post vangrop Posted July 28, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted July 28, 2020 After SEVEN years these crucial witnesses appear from nowhere. Well If I would be in the shoes of "Boss" I would sue them for the last 7 miserable years I had to spend due to their lack of civism. Really this banana state is the clowns part of Barnum & Bailey Circus. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanaplaza666 Posted July 28, 2020 Share Posted July 28, 2020 I geuss if he has started to hand out millions to "witnesses" that have been there and "saw" the accident , that street was unusualy busy that day in time . And i am not an expert but if a car hits a motorcycle in the back with 60km/h or even mph while the motorbike is also moving not standing still , i geus the damage wouldn't be like what i see in the picture . Damage like that you get when the motorbike is standing still and gets hit with 60km/h or mph or when the motorbike is driving and gets hit at 177km/h anywho, i am not an expert but what i do know is that this is not B.S but ???? coming out of a much bigger animal because B.S is not even beginning to say how made up this story is . D(inosaure).S 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post rkidlad Posted July 28, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted July 28, 2020 42 minutes ago, grumpy 4680 said: If these alleged witnesses, saw what happened, then failed to stop, surely they should be prosecuted for failure to do so. Or are there not any Laws in Thailand to that effect. Well, they did say there are no double standards here. If you can get away with speeding, drink driving, driving under the influence of a class A drug, hitting someone with your car, dragging their body along the floor, running from then scene of an incident, lying to the police, coercing your staff to take the blame and then absconding overseas *gasps for breath, then surely they can get away with failing to report any of this. After all, no crime was committed apparently.......... 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cardinalblue Posted July 28, 2020 Share Posted July 28, 2020 They did not dream it up - they were told exactly what to say....Follow the money hope all parties are found guilty and legally punished...Thai image is at stake 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post kiwikeith Posted July 28, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted July 28, 2020 5 hours ago, Kadilo said: Not just any old witness, but an “Air Marshall” Surely someone in that position wouldn’t tell porkies ???? Can anyone clear this up for me. If the pickup swerved to the left footpath, how could they observe what was happening in the third outside lane, how could they judge the speed of Brats car while they were taking evasive actions to avoid a motorcycle cop, how could their testimony be accepted regarding the speed Brat was doing , asI don’t know anyone who can be sure of another vehicles speed unless it was said as going faster than me and I was doing 60 km or otherwise you could only say the vehicle appeared to be going very fast or seemed to be at normal speed but you could not say you were certain of the speed. Also your attention was on taking evasive action. It is also impossible for car to take a bike that far at 60/80 kms for a start a experienced sober driver would’ve braked. My and most others conclusion would be that this is an orchestrated litany of pathetic lies 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiwikeith Posted July 28, 2020 Share Posted July 28, 2020 45 minutes ago, spidermike007 said: Ever wonder why it is so much easier for super wealthy people to come up with helpful witnesses, a d expert testimony? Do they honestly think anyone, and I mean anyone, is buying this load of nonsense? This is Thailand's version of "hi-so justice". If they want to save face now the justice department will have to pardon the B2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post hlj Posted July 28, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted July 28, 2020 The air marshal's plane was probably grounded because of the covad 19 he was out of work and could not continue his life style without work and income. The other witness just a joe off the streets to back up the air marshal's story. They have now have their scape goats, the brown envelopes must have been a big one. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
connda Posted July 28, 2020 Share Posted July 28, 2020 5 hours ago, thequietman said: Even if it were true, leaving the scene of an accident and not rendering assistance is a criminal offence. If he had remained, it's very likely that he would have failed a soberiety test - a crime. Driving in the far right lane at 60 kph while not overtaking- a crime. Stating that he wasn't driving the vehicle, when he was - a crime. Lying to the police - a crime. Even if totally not his fault, driving with a person trapped beneath your car causing their death - definitely a f@@k&*g crime. You missed fleeing the country to avoid prosecution. But for the "Boss" it's probably Ok! He's not a commoner. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nausea Posted July 28, 2020 Share Posted July 28, 2020 Read 1984, the past is alterable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Redline Posted July 28, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted July 28, 2020 (edited) It took them that long to come up with that story ???????????????????? I’m sure there are other witnesses and camera footage that somehow disappeared ???? worse than the watches I borrowed from my dead friend Edited July 28, 2020 by Redline 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangerP703 Posted July 28, 2020 Share Posted July 28, 2020 44 minutes ago, Nanaplaza666 said: I geuss if he has started to hand out millions to "witnesses" that have been there and "saw" the accident , that street was unusualy busy that day in time . And i am not an expert but if a car hits a motorcycle in the back with 60km/h or even mph while the motorbike is also moving not standing still , i geus the damage wouldn't be like what i see in the picture . Damage like that you get when the motorbike is standing still and gets hit with 60km/h or mph or when the motorbike is driving and gets hit at 177km/h anywho, i am not an expert but what i do know is that this is not B.S but ???? coming out of a much bigger animal because B.S is not even beginning to say how made up this story is . D(inosaure).S The windscreen was badly damaged, did the policeman bounce of it and then get tangled with the car to be dragged the 50 odd metres he was ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomazbodner Posted July 28, 2020 Share Posted July 28, 2020 6 hours ago, webfact said: They were sure that the Ferrari was doing 60 - 80 kmph only. 6 hours ago, webfact said: They said that their testimony contradicted previous assessments by accident investigators that the Ferrari was doing 177 kmph. How much would it cost to get 2 of the same model cars and reproduce the accident? Heck, Ferrari might have computer simulations for that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.4fd22303fa94eb0a6ebf5a9cf7194eb4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now