Jump to content

Afghan peace talks to open in Doha, 19 years after 9/11 triggered war


Recommended Posts

Posted

Afghan peace talks to open in Doha, 19 years after 9/11 triggered war

By Hamid Shalizi and Abdul Qadir Sediqi

 

2020-09-11T231337Z_1_LYNXMPEG8A1W7_RTROPTP_4_AFGHANISTAN-TALIBAN-TALKS.JPG

FILE PHOTO: Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, the leader of the Taliban delegation, and Zalmay Khalilzad, U.S. envoy for peace in Afghanistan, shake hands after signing an agreement at a ceremony between members of Afghanistan's Taliban and the U.S. in Doha, Qatar February 29, 2020. REUTERS/Ibraheem al Omari

 

KABUL (Reuters) - Talks between the Afghan government and Taliban insurgents start in Qatar's capital Doha on Saturday with the goal of bringing an end to nearly two decades of a conflict that has laid waste to the country and killed tens of thousands of combatants and civilians.

 

It is also the United States' longest overseas military action, vexing three successive U.S. presidents.

 

Officials, diplomats and analysts say that although getting both sides to the negotiating table was an achievement in itself, it does not mean the path to peace will be easy.

 

"The negotiations will have to tackle a range of profound questions about the kind of country Afghans want," Deborah Lyons, the United Nations Special Representative for Afghanistan, told the U.N Security Council this month.

 

The talks open with an inauguration ceremony which will be attended by U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. It takes place a day after the 19th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks on the United States that triggered its military involvement in Afghanistan.

 

U.S. forces intervened in Afghanistan on the orders of President George W. Bush a month after the attacks to hunt down their mastermind, Osama bin Laden, a Saudi who had been given sanctuary by the country's radical Islamist Taliban rulers. They initially offered mainly air support to the Taliban's local enemies.

 

Although the Taliban regime was quickly toppled, they regrouped and have since waged an insurgency that has sucked in Afghanistan's neighbours and troops from dozens of countries, including NATO forces.

 

Negotiations to broker a comprehensive peace deal were envisaged in a troop withdrawal pact signed between the United States and the Taliban in February in an attempt to find a political settlement to end the war.

 

After months of delay, a dispute over the Taliban's demand for the release of 5,000 prisoners was resolved this week.

 

Ahead of the U.S. presidential election in November, President Donald Trump is also looking to show progress in his pledge to end the U.S. involvement and pull out most of the foreign forces stationed in Afghanistan.

 

The United States has reduced its troop levels and by November is expected to have less than 5,000 soldiers in Afghanistan, down from about 13,000 when the U.S.-Taliban deal was signed. More than 2,300 U.S. troops have been killed in Afghanistan since 2001, and about 450 British soldiers.

 

A European diplomat in Kabul said that a ceasefire - which the Taliban have so far rejected - should top the talk's agenda.

 

"The Taliban leaders will have to stop fighters from attacking Afghan forces and civilians, violence continues to degrade the atmosphere and potentially derail negotiations," the diplomat said.

 

How to include the Taliban, who reject the legitimacy of the Western-backed Afghan government, in any governing arrangement and how to safeguard the rights of women and minorities who suffered under Taliban rule are big challenges, experts said.

 

Nevertheless many diplomats, victims of violence and members of civil society say negotiations are the only realistic way to bring an end to a conflict that has killed more than 100,000 civilians and hampered Afghanistan's development, leaving millions in poverty.

 

"Solutions will not be found on the battlefield, we know this," Lyons said.

 

(Writing by Rupam Jain and Charlotte Greenfield; Editing by Angus MacSwan)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2020-09-12
 

 

 

  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Boon Mee said:

Well, obviously, peace wouldn't be springing out all over if it was not for Donald J Trump, eh? 

MAGA 

Sure - no problem - Taliban will keep the peace.

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Bender Rodriguez said:

and still... they had nothing to do with 9/11, same as the iraq war... saudi sponsored terrorists...

The brains behind the 9/11 was living in Afghanistan and being protected by the Taliban. There will be no peace with the Taliban because they are religious fanatics that live by the sword and convert by the sword.  

Edited by IAMHERE
spelling
Posted
2 hours ago, Boon Mee said:

Well, obviously, peace wouldn't be springing out all over if it was not for Donald J Trump, eh? 

MAGA 

Huh gotta get me some trump glasses your boy is fermenting violence everywhere here scoffing science creating super spreader events during a pandemic contributing to killing Americans in the tens of thousands gas lighting much?trump is pandering for votes no more no less doesent even react to bounty’s on dead American GIs common man

Posted
34 minutes ago, IAMHERE said:

The brains behind the 9/11 was living in Afghanistan and being protected by the Taliban. There will be no peace with the Taliban because they are religious fanatics that live by the sword and convert by the sword.  

19 years, billions of dollars in treasure, blood from numerous nations and it will be left same as when it started. 

 

Could have left after 3 months with same result saving 1000's of lives and billions of tax payer cash.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...