Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Senate committee asked to rethink changing mandatory retirement age

Featured Replies

Senate committee asked to rethink changing mandatory retirement age

 

000_1VN4WF.jpg

Workers are transported on a truck to a construction site in Bangkok on July 23, 2020. (Photo by Mladen ANTONOV / AFP)

 

A subcommittee, of Thailand’s Senate Committee on Social Development and Affairs of Children, Youth, Women, Elderly People and Under-privileged people, has proposed a rethink and delay of a plan to increase the mandatory retirement age of government officials from 60 to 63.

 

The panel has cited five reasons that the plan, which was originally to be implemented in 2018, should be revised or further delayed.

 

Firstly, the panel said that the Government is now in the process of restructuring the bloated manpower resource in the public sector, whose salaries account for 1.1 trillion baht each year, or one-third of the annual budget.

 

Full story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/senate-committee-asked-to-rethink-changing-mandatory-retirement-age/

 

thaipbs.jpg
  • Popular Post

Secondly they are skint and can't afford anything other than subs tanks and planes swiss accounts remain unaffected ????  

  • Popular Post

Pretty sure by extending retirement age they would not be reducing expenditure.

 

What's more likely is workers being downclassed to lesser jobs on lesser wage which will reduce future pensions. 

 

 

  • Popular Post

A smart move would be to slim down the number of public employees.  They could start with the police.  I am pretty sure a reduction in total numbers by 25% would not see any appreciable difference in what the police actually do.  That would save many billions.

  • Popular Post
11 minutes ago, Grumpy John said:

A smart move would be to slim down the number of public employees.  They could start with the police.  I am pretty sure a reduction in total numbers by 25% would not see any appreciable difference in what the police actually do.  That would save many billions.

It would also have the effect of increasing the "share out" of the "unoficial supplements" to their salaries".

 

Win, win!

3 hours ago, RichardColeman said:

Pretty sure by extending retirement age they would not be reducing expenditure.

 

What's more likely is workers being downclassed to lesser jobs on lesser wage which will reduce future pensions. 

 

 

I think your wrong, because if you upgrade pension age you will have people working longer and paying pension premiums. Also they don't need to pay pension and salaries (if at 60 retire someone else needs to take their job so an extra salary and a pension for 3 years)

 

All over the world they save money by moving the retirement age. Why would it work differently in Thailand ? 

5 hours ago, Grumpy John said:

A smart move would be to slim down the number of public employees.  They could start with the police.  I am pretty sure a reduction in total numbers by 25% would not see any appreciable difference in what the police actually do.  That would save many billions.

And Irritation, sorry Immigration!! If I ran that they would save billions a year, 30-50% less staff and less rented buildings to stack the unearthly amount of repetitive photocopies!!!????????????????????????????????

Typically Thai make a law and delay it. People are living longer and the pension fund is running out of money. Most countries around the world when they have increased the pension age have increased it by one year every two years or more not three years in one go. The land tax on the rich was reduced by 80% so most rich people only had to pay the massive sum of 3,000 baht rather than 15,000 baht on their expensive homes. They can even pay the 3,000 in instalments. If the civil service is bloated it should have mandatory slimming down which is a separate issue from the retirement issue. 

11 hours ago, webfact said:

Firstly, the panel said that the Government is now in the process of restructuring the bloated manpower resource in the public sector, whose salaries account for 1.1 trillion baht each year, or one-third of the annual budget.

make a nice long list of everybody and how much they are getting paid...

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.