1 minute ago, englishoak said:

 

I did read, it says "citing scientists" but actually gives no citation detail, which usually means made up then goes onto claim every adult could have it in 6 mths which is probably the citation reference if any, but no mention of 3 at all, thats all headline bs ... regardless its utter drivel seeing as only 50% are even willing to take it.. its just the times making up headlines just like the rest of fleet street does... 

Reuters reports on a The Times report. No, not headline <deleted>, citations from report. 3 is, according to Reuters, in report.

 

Plus your earlier post was incorrect, and points raised you don't address. So you didn't read it didn't understand.

1 minute ago, stevenl said:

Reuters reports on a The Times report. No, not headline <deleted>, citations from report. 3 is, according to Reuters, in report.

 

Plus your earlier post was incorrect, and points raised you don't address. So you didn't read it didn't understand.

Well shoot me for misreading a badly laid out report on a report, there is nothing to understand, its just made up drivel

On 10/4/2020 at 6:45 AM, Chomper Higgot said:

Unless that happens leave the vaccine trial experts, statisticians and regulators to do their work.

 

You mean like the FAA did with the 737 Max?