Jump to content

Supreme Court upholds 50-year jail sentence for ex-TAT governor, 40 years for daughter


webfact

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, soi3eddie said:

I never heard of the case before but 1.8 Million USD in bribes just to host a film festival in Thailand? Guess that film festivals must be lucrative.

 

I was thinking the  same thing, there are many countries who would bend over backwards to have this festival take place in their land (without any bribe), why would they choose to pay that huge sum to Thailand? 

 

Something is missing in the story, possibly the Green's wanting to take the money out of the US and hide it in Thailand?

 

Which would also explain the US continuously following up the case to end with a conviction?

Edited by CanadaSam
Added a paragraph
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CanadaSam said:
20 hours ago, soi3eddie said:

I never heard of the case before but 1.8 Million USD in bribes just to host a film festival in Thailand? Guess that film festivals must be lucrative.

 

I was thinking the  same thing, there are many countries who would bend over backwards to have this festival take place in their land (without any bribe), why would they choose to pay that huge sum to Thailand? 

 

Something is missing in the story, possibly the Green's wanting to take the money out of the US and hide it in Thailand?

 

Which would also explain the US continuously following up the case to end with a conviction?

 

They didn't pay bribes because they wanted to hold a film festival, they paid because they wanted to be awarded lucrative contracts related to running a film festival - and the contracts they got were indeed worth far more than the bribes they paid. Here's what the US Department of Justice said:

 

"Gerald Green, 77, and Patricia Green, 52, both of West Hollywood, Calif., were charged on March 11, 2009, in a second superseding indictment with paying kickbacks to the former governor of the Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT) in exchange for receiving contracts to manage and operate Thailand’s yearly "Bangkok International Film Festival," as well as contracts to provide an elite tourism "privilege card" marketed to wealthy foreigners.

 

"Specifically , according to the superseding indictment, the Greens paid approximately $1.8 million in bribes to the former governor through numerous bank accounts in Singapore, the United Kingdom and the Isle of Jersey in the name of the former governor’s daughter and a friend of the former governor. The contracts received by the Greens resulted in more than $13.5 million in revenue to businesses they owned."

 

The DOJ also indicted Juthamas and her daughter, and only dropped the case after Thailand agreed to prosecute them instead.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Damrongsak said:

 

The Greens were given 6 month sentences.

 

 

The 6 months US prison term for essentialy the same crime is starkly different and much less than the Thai jail terms of 50 and 40 years! It really does seem that it's all about the money here yet from reports it appears that Juthamas and her daughter never had the money confiscated.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, soi3eddie said:

 

The 6 months US prison term for essentialy the same crime is starkly different and much less than the Thai jail terms of 50 and 40 years! It really does seem that it's all about the money here yet from reports it appears that Juthamas and her daughter never had the money confiscated.

 

I saw something about the Greens case, about a million or so in fines or whatnot, but chump change all considered. But the old man was about 80 years old when they were appealing the case.  Why bother?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, soi3eddie said:

The 6 months US prison term for essentialy the same crime is starkly different and much less than the Thai jail terms of 50 and 40 years! It really does seem that it's all about the money here yet from reports it appears that Juthamas and her daughter never had the money confiscated.

 

US prosecutors had requested ten year sentences, but the judge ended up imposing much shorter terms, mainly due to Gerald Green's ill health.

 

As for it being "essentially the same crime", it isn't. A person paying a bribe is violating the law, but a public official receiving a bribe is also violating the public trust, and is typically held to a higher standard (with more severe punishment). That being said, 50 years seems over the top considering the usual levels of sentencing in Thailand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, khunjeff said:

 

US prosecutors had requested ten year sentences, but the judge ended up imposing much shorter terms, mainly due to Gerald Green's ill health.

 

As for it being "essentially the same crime", it isn't. A person paying a bribe is violating the law, but a public official receiving a bribe is also violating the public trust, and is typically held to a higher standard (with more severe punishment). That being said, 50 years seems over the top considering the usual levels of sentencing in Thailand.

50 years for taking a bribe, but murder few years and slap on the wrist, death penalty for drug convictions, no consistency 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Juthamas's BIFF's were awesome, extravagant events. Deluxe presentations hosting foreign actors.

 

But I have some personal animosity for Juthamas. She ripped off my tourism research, had it translated into Thai & published, with not even attribution.

 

66 years is a little over the top, esp considering the Greens' six month sentences.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/17/2020 at 2:21 AM, nobodysfriend said:

 

 

 50 years in jail for corruption ? A convicted murderer only gets a few yrs here ...

His crime was not to share the money with his " superiors " .

She's been appointed by Thaksin. It doesn't absolve her of any crime but explains why she got 50 years while others are still running free.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/17/2020 at 2:40 PM, CanadaSam said:

Which would also explain the US continuously following up the case to end with a conviction?


The US is following this case ? They are the root cause of Thai law enforcement getting tough with these two.? :biggrin:    Nothing indicates that at all. Even if it did, the Thai police response is usually ... yawn, who cares. I'm puzzled, but suspect money has been parked offshore, safely offshore, out of reach of authorities in Thailand. Bring it back pay some fines, and sentence reduced.

Then again this indeed may be the factor ... after all vindictive nastiness, with a smile, is a Thai cultural trait.

 

3 hours ago, candide said:

She's been appointed by Thaksin. It doesn't absolve her of any crime but explains why she got 50 years while others are still running free.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...