PIcture: Sophon Cable TV

 

The district chief of Bang Lamung that encompasses Pattaya said that officers from the Department of Provincial Administration and the police were out checking that everyone was wearing a mask outside their homes. 

 

Wuthisak Singhadecha told Sophon Cable TV that he would prefer that people cooperated rather than face fines. 

 

But they would be fined for non-compliance. If they insisted on going to court - and that is a bothersome process, he said - they could be fined up to 20,000 baht.

 

PIcture: Sophon Cable TV

 

Better to pay on the spot he said - 6,000 baht for the first offence, 12,000 for the second and 20K the third. 

 

However, he said it could be lower if there are mitigating circumstances. 

 

This statement was not what a senior policeman said earlier this week in reference to two men who were fined just 500 baht in Ayutthaya, notes Thaivisa. 

 

The fines are in accordance with regulations initiated in Chonburi since January 4th but are only now being seriously enforced as the third wave of Covid 19 affects many provinces. 

 

-- © Copyright Thai Visa News 2021-04-28

 

- Whatever you're going through, the Samaritans are here for you

- Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking COVID-19 updates

Let us hope this is not abused.

How about indoors in public areas? (Malls)

going to need a special mask that allows food to pass through but blocks the virus 

 

 

Stupid nonsense 

5 minutes ago, Eindhoven said:

Just wear a mask....

Obviously.

I was wondering wrt policing. See many not bothering in the Malls.

QED. You can see the mindset of the people who refuse to comply with such a simple request.

2 minutes ago, smedly said:

 

not everyone can be perfect like you 

 

 

pretty sure if I go look at some of your contributions on TVF I will find you are far from perfect 

Eindhoven was only referring to non mask wearing. Nothing to do with previous posts in other forums, where he has helped many others with his PC advice.

It was you who mentioned the word PERFECT. 

A post with an offensive reference to middle aged foreigners and the inflammatory replies have been removed. 

Will this work the same as the motorcycle helmet law?

I've read that once you have your receipt for 'no helmet', you can show it for the rest of the day with impunity if stopped a second time.

Happy to follow rules and more than happy not to contract covid....BUT!

 

Do we really need to wear a mask in the open air and even more ridiculous a mask inside a car traveling around with people you already live with (or even sat in the car alone???).

 

Happy to be corrected by someone who feels they know better.

43 minutes ago, webfact said:

he said it could be lower if there are mitigating circumstances. 

 

Is, do you know who I am, one of those mitigating circumstances?

These guys enforce the ridiculous requirements and fines which are designed to fill their pockets. And will be applied selectively to those who seems payable.

 

But they ignore the fact that faulty designed Pattaya drainage system is deliverying all sort of infections around the streets and finally into the sea. They better go out in a rain in Pattaya, to see flows of sewage filling the streets.

42 minutes ago, Surelynot said:

Happy to follow rules and more than happy not to contract covid....BUT!

 

Do we really need to wear a mask in the open air and even more ridiculous a mask inside a car traveling around with people you already live with (or even sat in the car alone???).

 

Happy to be corrected by someone who feels they know better.

What about "outside the home" is unclear to you?

9 minutes ago, Pattaya Spotter said:

What about "outside the home" is unclear to you?

How is that even border line relevant or a vaguely intelligent response to the questions posed......

 

Do we really need to wear a mask in the open air and even more ridiculous a mask inside a car traveling around with people you already live with (or even sat in the car alone???)

 

It is a question of science, of relevance, of necessity......not a question of whether I can understand a simple statement......

 

imo 6000 thb is a bit of a killer for most of the Thai people

they earn around 10-12000 bahts\month (When they have a job)

and in these hard times a lot of them are just basically trying to survive

 

I understand the idea is to force them to comply with the requirment

but i hope they will not enforce it too severely, that could drive some people in more desperate situations

 

For the farangs i still see a lot of them outside in Pattaya without a mask

in a way i am not really surprised, they drive their motorbike without a helmet they <deleted> working girls without a condom, most of them are heavy drinkers\smokers and overweights, so it makes perfect  sense for them to continue the self destruction process

 

their rebel's motto:

''what's life without risks?''

''i am the only one who is important, who cares about the others?''

and finally ''live today like if there will be no tomorrow''

12 minutes ago, Surelynot said:

How is that even border line relevant or a vaguely intelligent response to the questions posed......

 

Do we really need to wear a mask in the open air and even more ridiculous a mask inside a car traveling around with people you already live with (or even sat in the car alone???)

 

It is a question of science, of relevance, of necessity......not a question of whether I can understand a simple statement......

 

you fink too mut

 

 

 

I mean there is a regulation

what about to comply to it?

Is the regulation makes sense?

Probably not at 100%

is wearing a mask is comfortable?

the answer is not

but if doing that can reduce the virus transmission risk 

even of a small 1 %, i take it !

7 minutes ago, Surelynot said:

How is that even border line relevant or a vaguely intelligent response to the questions posed......

 

Do we really need to wear a mask in the open air and even more ridiculous a mask inside a car traveling around with people you already live with (or even sat in the car alone???)

 

It is a question of science, of relevance, of necessity......not a question of whether I can understand a simple statement......

 

You may quote all your science and relevance to the police or city inspector when they stop you...maybe even print out and hand them some studies but I doubt it will do you any good. "Outside the home" in public (where the BIB and city inspectors have jurisdiction) seems pretty clear to me. And driving solo in a vehicle on a publicly maintained road is outside the home. Shopping malls, office buildings, and restaurants/small businesses have their own rules. But certainly do as you think best. 

The guy on tilte photo looks like he a 'holy papa' and lives in shrine. A district cheif??

Fit for the job, without doubt ????

1 minute ago, Pattaya Spotter said:

You may quote all your science and relevance to the police or city inspector when they stop you...maybe even print out and hand them some studies but I doubt it will do you any good. "Outside the home" in public (where the BIB and city inspectors have jurisdiction) seems pretty clear to me. And driving solo in a vehicle on a publicly maintained road is outside the home. Shopping malls, office buildings, and restaurants/small businesses have their own rules. But certainly do as you think best. 

Okay....you win......I give up.

So is this law and was it gazetted ?

6 minutes ago, Ralf001 said:

So is this law and was it gazetted ?

I believe local provincial governors and mayors of self governing local bodies like Pattaya, were given the authority to take these and other measures under earlier gazetted Covid-19 control measures. But if cited, maybe raise the "Royal Gazette" defense in court and see how far it gets you.

15 minutes ago, Pattaya Spotter said:

You may quote all your science and relevance to the police or city inspector when they stop you...maybe even print out and hand them some studies but I doubt it will do you any good. "Outside the home" in public (where the BIB and city inspectors have jurisdiction) seems pretty clear to me. And driving solo in a vehicle on a publicly maintained road is outside the home. Shopping malls, office buildings, and restaurants/small businesses have their own rules. But certainly do as you think best. 

No fines applicable for driving in a car without a mask if you are alone; only if carrying passengers. This from yesterday's CCSA English presentation.

A baiting post and a reply removed

Everyone I see on a motorbike have a mask. Covid have killed about 100 people in one year here in Thailand. If no mask there is a possible 20,000Baht fine

 

Less than 30% of people on a motorbike have a helmet. Motorbike traffic deaths, mostly due to not wearing a helmet, are around 20,000 per year. If no helmet there is a 200Baht fine!!!!!

 

1 hour ago, Surelynot said:

Happy to follow rules and more than happy not to contract covid....BUT!

 

Do we really need to wear a mask in the open air and even more ridiculous a mask inside a car traveling around with people you already live with (or even sat in the car alone???).

 

Happy to be corrected by someone who feels they know better.

Outside if it's crowded yes you should mask. I agree this rule is an overdo.

55 minutes ago, Surelynot said:

How is that even border line relevant or a vaguely intelligent response to the questions posed......

 

Do we really need to wear a mask in the open air and even more ridiculous a mask inside a car traveling around with people you already live with (or even sat in the car alone???)

 

It is a question of science, of relevance, of necessity......not a question of whether I can understand a simple statement......

 

Obviously the car thing is done to make sure that the police won't get in endless discussions. But its my gf.. but your not registered on the same adress ect ect. So they made it that its enforceable. Otherwise it would be not enforceable.

 

Of course it makes no sense to wear a mask in a car with someone you live with. But there is no way of really knowing and then enforcing this rule by the police. Otherwise everyone is suddenly living togetgher. 

 

Would it be smart to wear a mask in the car when your with friends ? Id say yes car is a small enclosed room and a danger. So to make sure they could enforce the law they just cast the net wider. Its either that or not being able to enforce the rule.

They are meant to give a fine invoice thing, if they don't don't pay.

 

Also....we shouldn't pay until the Prime Minister pays the 6k

34 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

Also....we shouldn't pay until the Prime Minister pays the 6k

Yeahh up to you lol

but i doubt The Great Leader will send you

an email with the copy of his payment receipt in attached file

So they expect you to wear a mask in your car huh?

 

First of all, that's just plain stupid.

 

Second, I'll put it on if I see a cop.

 

Third, unless I'm indoors I don't need to wear one. At the beach it's very dumb if nobody is around.

 

Go ahead and fine me guys.

Oh and I'm sure the 6K will find its way to the government. Yeah, sure it will, lol

Here's a fun hypothetical: imagine you live in a motorhome (not a trailer, or "caravan"). Is it a home? Is it a car? "Officer I AM at home... my home has wheels and an engine..." What would cop do? Probably not consider the issue: when in doubt, put the squeeze on....