Jump to content

Thailand reports 13,821 new COVID-19 cases and 241 more deaths


webfact

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, anchadian said:

(Google translate although the Thai year is 2564)

 

764305183_OperaSnapshot_2021-09-07_085652_translate.google_com.png.53bcc171ae9fbe09156bbdceb5b1edb8.png

 

https://www.facebook.com/phuketinfocenter/posts/381373433517839

May be an image of text that says "กาะหขวงสกลาอะร การตรวจคัดกรองด้วย Antigen Test Kit (ATK) เขตสุขภาพที่ 11 MANSTET PUBLIC ይAT วันที่: ก.ย. 2564 จำนวนการตรวจ รายใหม่ สะสม เวลา 00.00 u 3,125 98,929 6,914 10,691 ข้อมูลแยกรายจังหวัด ผลการตรวจ ATK สะสม (ตั้งแต่ ส.ค. 64) พังงา ระนอง 1,827 10,419 23,614 Positive รายใหม่ 38,907 Positive 40K สุราษฎร์ 6,557 Negative สะสม 136 30K 36,534 6,357 20K ร้อยละ 22,812 รายใหม่ 0.14 10K สะสม 6.43 10,287 6,693 0 8,082 40 กระบี่ ชุมพร 6,377 นครฯ พังงา ภูเก็ต ระนอง สุราษฎร์ สำนักงานเขตสุขภาพที่1"

Positivity rate of 6% then for ATK's in August through to 6th Sept

 

Cumulative ATK results (since Aug 1, 1964)
???? "Phuket Province" made the most proactive inspection
???? 38,907 examined
36,534 negative
Postive 2,373
.
???? Information as of 6 Sept. 20

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, daveAustin said:

Indeed. That’s the nub of it. Those saying Thailand’s numbers are low compared with western nations (that includes myopic government) only go by figures released and not the percentages, oddly failing to take into consideration testing rate etc. Test a million a day instead of sub-50000 (rolls eyes), what will you get?

It is somehow to be expected, that positivity rate is high, if you only test people with symptoms, walk-ins or close contacts.

If you test the general population, yes, you will find many more positives, but positivity rate would be lower as well.

 

I remember, here in Denmark, they went nuts last December when positivity rate was near 5 %...All doom and gloom, total lockdown.

 

 

Edited by drenddy
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, James105 said:

Spreading should be expected though as none of the vaccines can prevent this.   The crucial question is it vaccinated or unvaccinated people dying and/or in hospital there?   Do we know? 

Vaccines cannot prevent transmission. Really?

 

I wait with anticipation for you to provide evidence to support your claim.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

A study from China, confirming no neutralising antibodies against Delta were found six months after second shot.

 

Sinovac booster shot reverses drop in antibody activities against Covid-19 Delta variant: Study

 

BEIJING (REUTERS) - A booster dose of Sinovac Biotech's Covid-19 vaccine reversed a decline in antibody activities against the Delta variant, a study showed, easing some concerns about its longer-term immune response to the highly contagious strain of the virus.

 

Neutralising antibody activities against Delta were not detected in samples taken from vaccine recipients six months after they received the second dose of Sinovac's CoronaVac vaccine, according to the study published on Sunday (Sept 5) before a peer review.

 

https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/sinovac-booster-shot-reverses-drop-in-antibody-activities-against-covid-19-delta

The real test will be , how long does the booster work and do you gradually loose antibodies after the booster Jab? Like you do with the first 2 jabs 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Vaccines cannot prevent transmission. Really?

 

I wait with anticipation for you to provide evidence to support your claim.

Its common knowledge , vaccines do not stop you catching Covid /spreading it, it just makes you get less sick than if you were not vaccinated . 

   You can still catch Covid and die, even after being vaccinated 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, James105 said:

We are 18 months into the pandemic and this still comes as a surprise to you?   Try the CDC brief for size and see if this one works for you, if not there are many, many others.   

 

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/fully-vaccinated-people.html

 

Maybe you can quote the part where it says vaccines cannot prevent transmission?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, James105 said:

We are 18 months into the pandemic and this still comes as a surprise to you?   Try the CDC brief for size and see if this one works for you, if not there are many, many others.   

 

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/fully-vaccinated-people.html

 

 

Try to keep up:

 


Popular Science

 

Breakthrough cases won’t stop vaccines from ending the pandemic

BY KATE BAGGALEY | UPDATED AUG 27, 2021 6:01 AM

 

"...another recent report suggests that vaccinated people who catch COVID-19 are less infectious than the unvaccinated. Researchers found that viruses sampled from vaccinated people replicated less efficiently than viruses from unvaccinated people. The findings, which haven’t yet undergone peer review, could mean that people who develop breakthrough cases don’t “shed” as much virus as unvaccinated people who catch COVID-19..."

 

https://www.popsci.com/health/breakthrough-cases-wont-stop-pandemic/

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Maybe you can quote the part where it says vaccines cannot prevent transmission?

They don't stop transmission, they just reduce the possibility, but it can still happen.

  • A growing body of evidence indicates that people fully vaccinated with an mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna) are less likely than unvaccinated persons to acquire SARS-CoV-2 or to transmit it to others. However, the risk for SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection in fully vaccinated people cannot be completely eliminated as long as there is continued community transmission of the virus.
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Maybe you can quote the part where it says vaccines cannot prevent transmission?

Seriously?   

  • A growing body of evidence indicates that people fully vaccinated with an mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna) are less likely than unvaccinated persons to acquire SARS-CoV-2 or to transmit it to others. However, the risk for SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection in fully vaccinated people cannot be completely eliminated as long as there is continued community transmission of the virus

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

They don't stop transmission, they just reduce the possibility, but it can still happen.

  • A growing body of evidence indicates that people fully vaccinated with an mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna) are less likely than unvaccinated persons to acquire SARS-CoV-2 or to transmit it to others. However, the risk for SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection in fully vaccinated people cannot be completely eliminated as long as there is continued community transmission of the virus.

So vaccines can prevent the possibility of transmission. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Macrohistory said:

 

Try to keep up:

 


Popular Science

 

Breakthrough cases won’t stop vaccines from ending the pandemic

BY KATE BAGGALEY | UPDATED AUG 27, 2021 6:01 AM

 

"...another recent report suggests that vaccinated people who catch COVID-19 are less infectious than the unvaccinated. Researchers found that viruses sampled from vaccinated people replicated less efficiently than viruses from unvaccinated people. The findings, which haven’t yet undergone peer review, could mean that people who develop breakthrough cases don’t “shed” as much virus as unvaccinated people who catch COVID-19..."

 

https://www.popsci.com/health/breakthrough-cases-wont-stop-pandemic/

 

Your article agrees that the vaccine does not prevent transmission.    I think you are confused about what "less infectious" means.   

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

So vaccines can prevent the possibility of transmission. 

No, it means this:

A growing body of evidence indicates that people fully vaccinated are less likely than unvaccinated persons to acquire SARS-CoV-2 or to transmit it to others

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Maybe you can quote the part where it says vaccines cannot prevent transmission?

"Substantial reductions in SARS-CoV-2 infections (both symptomatic and asymptomatic) will reduce overall levels of disease, and therefore, viral transmission in the United States. However, investigations are ongoing to assess further the risk of transmission from fully vaccinated persons with breakthrough infections."

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, James105 said:

Spreading should be expected though as none of the vaccines can prevent this.   The crucial question is it vaccinated or unvaccinated people dying and/or in hospital there?   Do we know? 

I think your statement "Spreading should be expected though as none of the vaccines can prevent this"  is somewhat misleading.

 

No vaccine for any disease stops infection, transmission, symptoms, hospitalization and sometimes death, 100% of the time and has never been a vaccine's raison d'être.

 

Vaccines have always protected against disease in varying degrees at various stages.

 

And that applies to COVID vaccines.

 

The bottom line is that the COVID vaccine can stop people catching COVID, even the Delta variant.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, James105 said:

No, it means this:

A growing body of evidence indicates that people fully vaccinated are less likely than unvaccinated persons to acquire SARS-CoV-2 or to transmit it to others

So you now agree vaccines can prevent transmission!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bkk Brian said:

Just when I thought we would have a gap of a few days another death brings it to 8 dead in just 3 days in Phuket, where the health authorities there said yesterday that Sinovac is not able to stop the spread there.

"the health authorities there said yesterday that Sinovac is not able to stop the spread" - That will make the CCP unhappy, but finally the truth!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LosLobo said:

So you now agree vaccines can prevent transmission!

Only in the same way that a lock can "prevent" a determined burglar from entering your home, which in normal English means that a lock cannot "prevent" a burglar from entering your home.      

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Actually, they do. Deaths lag new infections by some days.

In fact they can lag by two weeks or more.

 

According to the article below from the Telegraph:

 

Quote

Study of patients in China shows median time to discharge was 22 days while average time to death was 18.5 days.

Coronavirus kills in an average of 18 days

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Scrotobike said:

"the health authorities there said yesterday that Sinovac is not able to stop the spread" - That will make the CCP unhappy, but finally the truth!

Yet the CCP in another OP was very upset and insisted that the stories being spread were false....hmmm, oh who to believe, less efficacy or greater efficacy, sounds wishy washy at best to me.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Macrohistory said:

 

You're being nice to him when you write "somewhat misleading."  As usual with the covid-denying brigade, he offered an oversimplified, distorted interpretation of reality.  You responded with a nuanced correction and he still doesn't realize he was wrong.

 

That’s strange. He replied with the exact same extract as Thailand Ryan.
 

Is he now also part of the ‘COVID-denying brigade offering oversimplified, distorted interpretation of reality’ ?

Edited by Kadilo
  • Confused 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, GroveHillWanderer said:

Yes, so the statement that was being challenged, and which said that vaccines cannot prevent transmission, is incorrect. They can prevent transmission, they're just not 100% guaranteed to do so in all cases.

As with a mask, a distance, an amulet - look a vaccine does not prevent transmission - just helps to prevent it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...