Jump to content

Former MP questions how a defective Thai parliament building was accepted


webfact

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

I wonder if the irony is lost on anyone....  

 

That photo... ????

I noticed that too, a stand for anti corruption collapsing..................just keep passing the brown envelopes.................:clap2:

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somebody paid for the ranch, the private airport in Khao Yai, apart from letting him get away with ministerial government statements like "dirty farang" and "alien". 

Well, here the dirty farang - for once - cannot be blamed; not too sure about the "alien". 

You are hopefully aware that the same enterprise, pure co-incidentially of course, built the Suvannaphoum airport and during the co-owner's reign in the health ministry among the junta executives, got another little order inked for the extension of the airport worth anything between 50 - 60 billion (not million) Baht. 

Mysterious are the ways of the East - wonders never seize! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They should look into why Sino- Thai was chosen.

 

Anutin, the "Health Minister" was once the president.

 

"He  was the President of Sino-Thai Engineering and Construction Public Co., Ltd during March 1995 – June 2004.  He also served as the Director to the Federation of Thai Industries and Thai Contractors Association Under H.M. the King’s Patronage."

 

https://icfp2022.org/team-member/mr-anutin-charnviakul/

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, webfact said:

Former Democrat MP Watchara Petthong is seeking answers from the office of the secretary-general of the House of Representatives about how it can accept the delivery of the 12 billion baht parliament building from its builder, Sino-Thai Engineering and Construction Public Company, despite its many defects.

That's easy.

Under the table.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, webfact said:

Arun Laipongpaew, why the House secretariat had not reported these defects to the public and whether people who visit the exhibition hall will have to wear crash helmets for their safety.

Classic!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...