Jump to content

Transferred Pattaya police chief is back at Pattaya police station


webfact

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, sambum said:
On 10/1/2022 at 12:57 PM, Liverpool Lou said:

"no shame at all...."

What exactly was confirmed by the enquiry about the police chief's actions that he should have been ashamed about?

Thought you'd be along sooner than later! Fighting for the "underdog" as per usual!

It's a forum, don't forget, one consensus of Thai-bashing opinion is not demanded by the rules.  Neither are accurate observations outlawed here.   

Perhaps you're aware of something that the enquiry condemned him for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

It's a forum, don't forget, one consensus of Thai-bashing opinion is not demanded by the rules.  Neither are accurate observations outlawed here.   

Perhaps you're aware of something that the enquiry condemned him for?

I was merely making an observation about your usual reactions to certain observations!

Regarding your question, one poster put it rather succinctly - "Inaction". In other words not what he did, but rather what he didn't do!

Edited by sambum
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I understand being transferred to an inaction post just means he is kept away from whatever investigation is underway.

Not that he is guilty of anything they just don't want him to influence the result.

If nothing is found he can be brought back with no loss of service or rank. In England they would state that he is suspended while the facts are investigated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, roger101 said:

From what I understand being transferred to an inaction post just means he is kept away from whatever investigation is underway.

Not that he is guilty of anything they just don't want him to influence the result.

If nothing is found he can be brought back with no loss of service or rank. In England they would state that he is suspended while the facts are investigated.

The difference being that in England there is a decent chance of a thorough and impartial investigation.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, roger101 said:

From what I understand being transferred to an inaction post just means he is kept away from whatever investigation is underway.

Not that he is guilty of anything they just don't want him to influence the result.

If nothing is found he can be brought back with no loss of service or rank. In England they would state that he is suspended while the facts are investigated.

I agree with this, but would include also the words scandal or blame. And that the result cannot impact on him....It is like saying there are suspicions he is embroiled, that would reflect badly on the force,  we will move him away until the fuss dies down. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Yet the investigation into the now reinstated officer said nothing about "inaction" on his part, did it?

Did it also say why he had been suspended/inactive posted in the first place?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/1/2022 at 2:57 AM, Liverpool Lou said:

"Yet another travesty o0f justice".

Why?  What was it decided that he had done wrong?   

 

For someone who was cleared by the enquiry wouldn't it have been a travesty of justice if he was punished?

You really don't have any understanding of how things work there do you? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...