6 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Way off topic . 

I was answering the question you asked.

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I was answering the question you asked.

I wasn't asking you though .

I was speaking to the person who posted the link 

As he went way off topic, you should just have ignored it , like I did 

2 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

I wasn't asking you though .

I was speaking to the person who posted the link 

As he went way off topic, you should just have ignored it , like I did 

I didn’t ignore it, I asked the question you asked.

 

If you don’t like the answer don’t ask the question.

 

 

 

8 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

I don't know what is a worse idea: Spending many billions on Twitter or on Mars.

Maybe he's trying to find intelligent life on either of them.  He's wasting his time if he is.

3 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Trump did suggest ‘bringing light inside of peoples bodies’.

 

 

There are only so many available orifices.

Just for clarification  , the suggestion was that it may be possible for scientists to invent some way of getting U.V light shone through peoples skin, like an X-ray or something , completely untrue about shining lights up peoples bums , as a poster claimed 

8 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Just for clarification  , the suggestion was that it may be possible for scientists to invent some way of getting U.V light shone through peoples skin, like an X-ray or something , completely untrue about shining lights up peoples bums , as a poster claimed 

half true

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52399464

1 minute ago, placeholder said:

half true

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52399464

Yes,  the  claim about shining U.V lights up peoples bums was the thing that wasn't true 

11 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Yes,  the  claim about shining U.V lights up peoples bums was the thing that wasn't true 

Yes sometimes people miss the satire intended

16 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

You really need to write something, rather than just posting a link . Links are for backing up an opinion , rather than being your opinion itself 

I'm not posting an opinion, I'm answering your question. 

You're welcome.

14 hours ago, ballpoint said:

Maybe he's trying to find intelligent life on either of them.  He's wasting his time if he is.

Looking at trending daily tweets I would say the chances are much greater on finding intelligent life on Mars, even after they kicked trump off the platform.

Elon Musk: Twitter won't 'take yes for an answer' https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-63166568
 

"There is no need for an expedited trial to order defendants to do what they are already doing," Mr Musk's attorneys wrote in a filing.

"Yet, Twitter will not take yes for an answer. Astonishingly they have insisted on proceeding with this litigation, recklessly putting the deal at risk and gambling with their stockholders interests."
 

Sensible and 100% understandable stance taken by twitter. Musk is as untrustworthy as they come. 
 

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/oct/06/elon-musk-twitter-takeover-delaware-court?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Edited October 6, 20223 yr by Bluespunk
Second link added

On 10/5/2022 at 11:31 AM, Mac Mickmanus said:

Just for clarification  , the suggestion was that it may be possible for scientists to invent some way of getting U.V light shone through peoples skin, like an X-ray or something , completely untrue about shining lights up peoples bums , as a poster claimed 

UV is not X-ray, they are very different parts of the electromagnetic spectrum.  UV does not penetrate far into skin, and what little penetration that does occur causes sunburn and skin cancer.

 

You'd think a person who bragged about his really good brain and that he was smart because he had an uncle who taught at MIT would understand this basic, high school level physics.