Jump to content

Brexit: thousands of Britons expelled from EU since end of transition period


Scott
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, BacchusGPT said:

We should be fine then, because a couple of thousand is a small number compared to the number of British people residing in the EU. They don't even say why these people were ejected. They could have been kicked out for reasons we all agree with.

There again they could have been kicked out for any number of reason we all don’t agree with.

 

A but tough on people who were denied a vote on BREXIT despite BREXIT having such a direct impact on their lives.

 

Nevertheless, welcome brand new member.

 

It’s always nice to, at least have the possibility, of new voices and opinions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

2,250 is a miniscule number. We get far more illegal refugees from EU countries landing in the same period but the Guardian wouldn't mention that.

 

It doesn't even say they were expelled due to Brexit. It could have been due to criminal activity rather than residency rules.

 

The Guardian still appears angry at losing the vote 😄

The Guardian frequently reports on illegal immigration, they don’t however conflate their reports on the matter with a report on Britons being expelled from EU nations.

 

The Guardian didn’t get to vote on Brexit, neither did Britons living in EU nations, despite being the British citizens most effected by the outcome.

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The Guardian didn’t get to vote on Brexit

Well The Guardian is a newspaper so no, it didn't vote. But we are all aware of the left wing Remainer stance of the organization and those that work for it. So it's no surprise they are still bleating about it 7 years after the vote.

 

At least they acknowledged that they didn't know the reason people were being asked to leave (hence it could be totally unrelated to Brexit).

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Well The Guardian is a newspaper so no, it didn't vote. But we are all aware of the left wing Remainer stance of the organization and those that work for it. So it's no surprise they are still bleating about it 7 years after the vote.

 

At least they acknowledged that they didn't know the reason people were being asked to leave (hence it could be totally unrelated to Brexit).

It’s totally unrelated to illegal immigration to the UK (inserted by you), but how you can claim it is not related BREXIT which removed from all British citizens the right to live and work in EU nations is a mystery.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

It doesn't even say they were expelled due to Brexit. It could have been due to criminal activity rather than residency rules.

 

The Guardian still appears angry at losing the vote 😄

The Guardian, most of the MSM and the entire civil service in the UK are extremely angry at losing the vote and doing their best to sabotage Brexit. Three years on and we're still struggling to get masses of unnecessary EU laws off the statute book. Rishi need to get a grip, particularly on illegal immigration.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

It’s totally unrelated to illegal immigration to the UK (inserted by you), but how you can claim it is not related BREXIT which removed from all British citizens the right to live and work in EU nations is a mystery.

 

 

The data does not specify why they were ordered to leave. Could have been any number of reasons e.g. criminal offenses.

 

How do you know it is related to Brexit? It may as well have said x,xxx Britons expelled from the EU since Covid 19 spread.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Tomorrow's headline from The Guardian. "60% more typhoons in Phillipines since 2016 Brexit vote".

 

They really do try and pin everything on Brexit 😄.

 

 

Because I read the article.

 

Refer above and follow the link.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Doctor Tom said:

I imagine that the small figure is almost totally criminals and otherwise undesirables. Maybe a dozen or so who didn't get their residency paperwork in order, in time, who will no doubt return when they have done so.  A none report.  

One can imagine lots of things.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Tomorrow's headline from The Guardian. "60% more typhoons in Phillipines since 2016 Brexit vote".

 

They really do try and pin everything on Brexit 😄.

 

 

You could counter it with some tangible BREXIT benefits.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

There zero EU laws on the UK statute books.

 

 

Nonsense. There's a committee going through 11,000 pieces of legislation imposed on the UK by the EU to decide which are no longer required and can be removed. My guess is it's about 99.5% of them.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The laws were not ‘imposed on the UK’ the UK was actively involved in their drafting, had an absolute right to veto and passed the laws in the UK Parliament.

 

Of course they did.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brexit the gift that keeps taking but not for Boris a million quid for 4 speeches the only tangible benefit so far 🤔 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at what happened in Spain, foreigners were told they should register to get residence but a lot of people didn't and were asked to leave.

Make same same but different. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RayC said:

 

Looks like your estimate of 99.5% is way off the mark according to this government minister

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/01/05/uk-may-scrap-hundreds-not-thousands-eu-laws/

 

So they're only focusing on the top 10% of useless laws to avoid wasting parliamentary time (not because they're not useless laws). Sounds like a sensible approach.

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, roquefort said:

So they're only focusing on the top 10% of useless laws to avoid wasting parliamentary time (not because they're not useless laws). Sounds like a sensible approach.

What Sunak is doing is kicking the can down the road.

 

The ERG want full deregulation of the UK, which like the Lettuce’s ripping up ‘economic orthodoxy’ will result in extreme damage to the UK economy.

 

It certainly will not deliver benefits for ordinary citizens.

 

A battle is due, between the madness of the ERG and Conservative prudence.

 

 

 

 

Edited by Chomper Higgot
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

What Sunak is doing is kicking the can down the road.

 

What all governments do.

 

6 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The ERG want full deregulation of the UK, which like the Lettuce’s ripping up ‘economic orthodoxy’ will result in extreme damage to the UK economy

 

Exactly what damage to the UK economy could be worse than 10% inflation, negative growth, strikes on a scale not seen since the 1970s and total collapse of the NHS?

Edited by roquefort
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The laws were not ‘imposed on the UK’ the UK was actively involved in their drafting, had an absolute right to veto and passed the laws in the UK Parliament.

 

I wish we had tried to veto them - then we would have been kicked out decades ago and a referendum would have not been necessary.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, nauseus said:

I wish we had tried to veto them - then we would have been kicked out decades ago and a referendum would have not been necessary.

Why would the UK veto laws and regulations that the UK had an active role in drafting?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

[
×
×
  • Create New...