3 hours ago, Kwasaki said:

Another western one who will not try and understand where his thinking comes from, right or wrong the only way that will lead to peace is dialogue. 

Don't have to understand his thinking or where it comes from.

The road to peace starts with the invaders leaving Ukraine.

 

Slava Ukraine

10 hours ago, Sydebolle said:

History repeats itself. It is not the German average Joe this time, fanned by Nazi slogans but an absolute ignorant government under the guidance of NATO in Brussels. 

Germans were made to understand that their army may only protect Germany's borders; NATO managed to interpret, that there are "German" borders in Afghanistan and Ukraine.

Once the deal goes sour, the entire mishpachah can blame the Arians again and right they are. 

This, of course, would be different, if those tanks would be painted in white with a blue/black UN on it while the crew would wear blue helmets - but that organization is busy with itself, it seems! 

Interesting that Kwasaki and NativeBob endorse the anti-semitic comments of Sydebolle. Comments that clearly are aligned with Nazi ideology.

Edited February 3, 20233 yr by placeholder

3 hours ago, placeholder said:

Interesting that Kwasaki and NativeBob endorse the anti-semitic comments of Sydebolle. Comments that clearly are aligned with Nazi ideology.

I cannot see anything anti-semitic whatsoever in my comments. My input was based on NATO breathing down the German neck to the extend, that the Germans (have to?) follow a protocol which is clearly against their constitution. Whatever else you might read into my lines is and remains your problem! 

10 hours ago, placeholder said:

As this sentence show in its obscurantist way, Sydebolle is an unapologetic anti-Semite.

 

Here's the definition of "Mishpachah":

"The meaning of MISHPACHAH is a Jewish family or social unit including close and distant relatives."

Making this a Jewish-Aryan dispute is, of course, nonsense. But to someone obsessed by Jew-hatred, as Sydebolle is, this makes perfect sense. Clearly, he's in sympathy with at least some of the essence of Nazi ideology.

What might help in your rant is, that I am Jewish - your call! Once you manage Yiddish fluently, then you will understand the terminology! 

5 minutes ago, Sydebolle said:

I cannot see anything anti-semitic whatsoever in my comments. My input was based on NATO breathing down the German neck to the extend, that the Germans (have to?) follow a protocol which is clearly against their constitution. Whatever else you might read into my lines is and remains your problem! 

Coupling a yiddish word with "Arians" in a sentence is a dead giveaway.

"Once the deal goes sour, the entire mishpachah can blame the Arians again and right they are. "

You used the word "Arians" (your spelling) as though Jews have some kind of animus towards people who are members of a scientifically invalid race concept. A concept promoted by Nazis. In fact, a concept that was the core of Nazism. Only someone obsessed by antisemitism would make a blatantly irrelevant reference to "Arians". As for your claim to be Jewish...why should I give any credence to an anonymous member of aseannow.com when his comments make that claim exceedingly unlikely?

 

 

5 hours ago, placeholder said:

Coupling a yiddish word with "Arians" in a sentence is a dead giveaway.

"Once the deal goes sour, the entire mishpachah can blame the Arians again and right they are. "

You used the word "Arians" (your spelling) as though Jews have some kind of animus towards people who are members of a scientifically invalid race concept. A concept promoted by Nazis. In fact, a concept that was the core of Nazism. Only someone obsessed by antisemitism would make a blatantly irrelevant reference to "Arians". As for your claim to be Jewish...why should I give any credence to an anonymous member of aseannow.com when his comments make that claim exceedingly unlikely?

 

 

Having a bad day, do we?
Lean back, have a G&T and cool down ........... as I can write it for you, I can read it for you but I cannot understand it for you.
Placeholder is as anonymous as most other membership handles and what do you know if my comments are exceedingly likely or not. Stop playing the keyboard warrior in arms, go outside and carpe diem ???? The bucket stops here as I shall not take this endless thread any further; it is a hopeless undertaking. 

1 hour ago, Sydebolle said:

Having a bad day, do we?
Lean back, have a G&T and cool down ........... as I can write it for you, I can read it for you but I cannot understand it for you.
Placeholder is as anonymous as most other membership handles and what do you know if my comments are exceedingly likely or not. Stop playing the keyboard warrior in arms, go outside and carpe diem ???? The bucket stops here as I shall not take this endless thread any further; it is a hopeless undertaking. 

In other words, you've got nothing.

What Putin carefully omitted to mention, was at that time Russia was invading the Ukraine using lease lend US Sherman tanks against German Panzer tanks.

13 hours ago, billd766 said:

What Putin carefully omitted to mention, was at that time Russia was invading the Ukraine using lease lend US Sherman tanks against German Panzer tanks.

Why should he mention it even if it's true? What does it change on the crazy fact which side the German tanks are now fighting? 

 

Weren't the Sherman tanks used by Soviets and paid back by Soviets after the war much earlier than the British Land-Lease debt finished only some 15 years ago?

 

Of course, the British had a huge debt to pay back. They got 3 times more military equipment than the USSR. Interestingly, this fact is hardly publicised when discussing why the UK won the war (as always mentioned at the Soviets).

   

BTW, didn't you hear something about famous T-34 tanks? How the biggest tank battle at Kursk was won against the best German tank specialist gen. Guderian who said that even many hundreds tanks more would never help him to win.

6 hours ago, Saanim said:

Why should he mention it even if it's true? What does it change on the crazy fact which side the German tanks are now fighting? 

Because it's not the tanks that are fighting the Russians, it's the Ukrainians who are fighting the Russians. Tanks, like any weapon, are just tools. They enjoy no independent agency.