Jump to content

Siege in Phetchaburi: Police shoot out of control man dead after he kills 3, injures four in 15 hour standoff


webfact

Recommended Posts

Quote

was shot dead by police in a judicial killing.

Do you just say words? Do you know what you're even saying? Does this reporter think up clever words and then work them randomly into a story and then show his/her parents for some praise and cookies?

 

Total buffoonery.

Edited by side
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ThailandRyan said:
fools rush in where angels fear to tread
 
phrase of fool
 
  1. PROVERB
    people without good sense or judgment will have no hesitation in tackling a situation that even the wisest would avoid.

I saw something in America a few years ago. Why didn't the cops rush in? It was pointed out that the shooter was using an AR15, whilst the cops on the scene only had handguns. Go figure! ????????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ThailandRyan said:

 

 

 

5 hours ago, ThailandRyan said:

So it would have been OK for the police to rush on in and have more wild gunfire from the gunmen kill them or innocent bystanders outside as the bullets flew outside from inside. It doesn't bother me that he died, however it would have when and if others had because of the negligence created by rushing in and of which you seem to condone with your view of it taking too long.

Did he not say the word 'sniper'? ????????‍♂️

Edited by Speedhump
Speeling and grammer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

But wouldn't that mean that some people had already taken people's eyes?  As in, each case of "an eye for an eye" a guilty party would have taken someone's eye, so steering away from "an eye for an eye" would simply leave a load of people having had their eyes attacked.

 

I wouldn't put too much stock in Gandhi anyway.  He was apparently quite an unpleasant person.

If you keep taking eyes you end up with "the one eyed man is king among the blind."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phetchaburi siege had to end to avoid more people being killed or injured

 

Thai-PBS-World-logo-3-2.png

 

Police had to use force to end the recent armed standoff at a housing estate in Phetchaburi province because more people could have been killed or injured if the situation had been allowed to continue, according to Pol Lt-Gen Thanayut Wuthicharasthamrong, commissioner of the 7th Regional Police Bureau.

 

The 15-hour siege ended with the gunman, identified as “Anuwat”, who was holding out in a property in the housing estate, was shot dead by police. Three innocent people had already been killed by the gunman and three others injured, including an officer of the police special operations unit involved in the storming of the house.

 

Pol Lt-Gen Thanayut said that the gunman appeared to know combat techniques used in a siege situation when he was surrounded by the police.

 

Full Story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/phetchaburi-siege-had-to-end-to-avoid-more-people-being-killed-or-injured/

 

Logo-top-.png

-- © Copyright Thai PBS 2023-03-23
 

- Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here.

 

The most versatile and flexible rental investment and holiday home solution in Thailand - click for more information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ThailandRyan said:

So it would have been OK for the police to rush on in and have more wild gunfire from the gunmen kill them or innocent bystanders outside as the bullets flew outside from inside. It doesn't bother me that he died, however it would have when and if others had because of the negligence created by rushing in and of which you seem to condone with your view of it taking too long.

Sounds logical, then I think about the US School shooting in Uvalde, Tx last year that while a contingent of several highly (and VERY expensively) trained state and local SWAT teams stood around dithering outside, the killer was allowed to wander inside the school, systematically killing 19 children and 2 adults.

All those cops who earned tens of thousands of bonus dollars doing SWAT and other crises training sitting around sayin "Nope, not worth the risk."

 

Bystanders, both in the Thai incident yesterday and in Uvalde had long been cleared away, the perimeter had been secured so the "innocent bystander" excuse holds no water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ThailandRyan said:

So an eye for an eye, well no justice system needed then. You speed we cut off your accelerator foot or your throttle hand. You touch something and it's gets damaged we chop off your hand. You must want to return to living in a feudal society.  God forbid you look at a women walking by you, your eyes will be put out...

Sounds like Saudi Arabia

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/23/2023 at 11:33 AM, ThailandRyan said:

Amicably by surrendering voluntarily without force necessary. You must think that justice would be served by blowing up the house and killing him. You definitely don't like any judicial system, no matter how bad it is. Back we go to the wild west, hangem high, shoot it out, shoot the one who wronged you in the back, lynch mob mentality I see from a few posting.

Actually. I think that each case/situation should be judged on merit and circumstances. What justice do you believe this particular intentional killer should be afforded ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mancub said:

Actually. I think that each case/situation should be judged on merit and circumstances. What justice do you believe this particular intentional killer should be afforded ?

 

if he had given up and surrendered, then arrested, he would have them been prosecuted and either sentenced to death if it met the legal requirements, if not then imprisoned.  Of course he would have probably claimed innocence by mental defect or insanity caused by his use of the drugs he was initially arrested for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, side said:

Do you just say words? Do you know what you're even saying? Does this reporter think up clever words and then work them randomly into a story and then show his/her parents for some praise and cookies?

 

Total buffoonery.

They shot the wrong bloke, should be the reporter.????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, hotchilli said:

A few flash bangs in all the windows, fill the house with smoke and choke the bu##er out.

If he doesn't come out give him a final warning, 5 minutes to surrender or we come in. 

Brilliant idea - give him five minutes to prepare for the attack so undoubtedly more people will be killed or injured.. Genius.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...